Adam Hurlow1, Lucy Wyld2, Andrew Breen2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To review advance care planning (ACP) practice during the COVID-19 pandemic, evaluating the number of plans created, patient participation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation recommendations and variation between different population groups.
DESIGN: A retrospective analysis and comparison of routinely collected data from electronic recommended summary plan for emergency care and treatment (ReSPECT) records documented in April 2020 and January to December 2019. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Electronic ReSPECT documents completed for adult patients at a large, acute hospital trust in the UK.
RESULTS: The number of plans created per 1,000 admissions in April 2020 was 333.0% higher than in 2019. A greater proportion of plans created during April 2020 were discussed with the patient and the proportion containing a 'for cardiopulmonary resuscitation' recommendation was higher across all population groups. A greater proportion of plans were created for younger adults and Black and minority ethnic groups during the pandemic.
CONCLUSION: Increased ACP during a crisis can be achieved alongside increased patient participation in decision making. A tool such as ReSPECT that supports recommendations for, as well as limitations on, treatment may have enabled the expansion of ACP observed. © Royal College of Physicians 2021. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVE: To review advance care planning (ACP) practice during the COVID-19 pandemic, evaluating the number of plans created, patient participation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation recommendations and variation between different population groups.
DESIGN: A retrospective analysis and comparison of routinely collected data from electronic recommended summary plan for emergency care and treatment (ReSPECT) records documented in April 2020 and January to December 2019. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Electronic ReSPECT documents completed for adult patients at a large, acute hospital trust in the UK.
RESULTS: The number of plans created per 1,000 admissions in April 2020 was 333.0% higher than in 2019. A greater proportion of plans created during April 2020 were discussed with the patient and the proportion containing a 'for cardiopulmonary resuscitation' recommendation was higher across all population groups. A greater proportion of plans were created for younger adults and Black and minority ethnic groups during the pandemic.
CONCLUSION: Increased ACP during a crisis can be achieved alongside increased patient participation in decision making. A tool such as ReSPECT that supports recommendations for, as well as limitations on, treatment may have enabled the expansion of ACP observed. © Royal College of Physicians 2021. All rights reserved.
Entities:
Keywords:
COVID-19; advance care planning; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; decision making; patient participation
Mesh:
Year: 2021
PMID: 33958345 PMCID: PMC8313194 DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.2020-1036
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Med (Lond) ISSN: 1470-2118 Impact factor: 2.659