M T Caton1, K H Narsinh2, A Baker2, C F Dowd2, R T Higashida2, D L Cooke2, S W Hetts2, V V Halbach2, M R Amans2. 1. From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Interventional Neuroradiology Section, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California michael.caton2@ucsf.edu. 2. From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Interventional Neuroradiology Section, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: AVFs of the foramen magnum region, including fistulas of the marginal sinus and condylar veins, have complex arterial supply, venous drainage, symptoms, and risk features that are not well-defined. The purpose of this study was to present the angioarchitectural and clinical phenotypes of a foramen magnum region AVF from a large, single-center experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed cases from a 10-year neurointerventional data base. Arterial and venous angioarchitectural features and clinical presentation were extracted from the medical record. Venous drainage patterns were stratified into 4 groups as follows: type 1 = unrestricted sinus drainage, type 2 = sinus reflux (including the inferior petrosal sinus), type 3 = reflux involving sinuses and cortical veins, and type 4 = restricted cortical vein outflow or perimedullary congestion. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (mean age, 57.9 years; 57.1% men) had 29 foramen magnum region AVFs. There were 11 (37.9%) type 1, nine (31.0%) type 2, six (20.7%) type 3, and 3 (10.3%) type 4 fistulas. Pulsatile tinnitus was the most frequent symptom (82.1%), followed by orbital symptoms (31.0%), subarachnoid hemorrhage (13.8%), cranial nerve XII palsy (10.3%), and other cranial nerve palsy (6.9%). The most frequent arterial supply was the ipsilateral ascending pharyngeal artery (93.1% ipsilateral, 55.5% contralateral), vertebral artery (89.7%), occipital artery (65.5%), and internal carotid artery branches (48.3%). CONCLUSIONS: We present the largest case series of foramen magnum region AVFs to date and show that clinical features relate to angioarchitecture. Orbital symptoms are frequent when sinus reflux is present. Hemorrhage was only observed in type 3 and 4 fistulas.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: AVFs of the foramen magnum region, including fistulas of the marginal sinus and condylar veins, have complex arterial supply, venous drainage, symptoms, and risk features that are not well-defined. The purpose of this study was to present the angioarchitectural and clinical phenotypes of a foramen magnum region AVF from a large, single-center experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed cases from a 10-year neurointerventional data base. Arterial and venous angioarchitectural features and clinical presentation were extracted from the medical record. Venous drainage patterns were stratified into 4 groups as follows: type 1 = unrestricted sinus drainage, type 2 = sinus reflux (including the inferior petrosal sinus), type 3 = reflux involving sinuses and cortical veins, and type 4 = restricted cortical vein outflow or perimedullary congestion. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (mean age, 57.9 years; 57.1% men) had 29 foramen magnum region AVFs. There were 11 (37.9%) type 1, nine (31.0%) type 2, six (20.7%) type 3, and 3 (10.3%) type 4 fistulas. Pulsatile tinnitus was the most frequent symptom (82.1%), followed by orbital symptoms (31.0%), subarachnoid hemorrhage (13.8%), cranial nerve XII palsy (10.3%), and other cranial nerve palsy (6.9%). The most frequent arterial supply was the ipsilateral ascending pharyngeal artery (93.1% ipsilateral, 55.5% contralateral), vertebral artery (89.7%), occipital artery (65.5%), and internal carotid artery branches (48.3%). CONCLUSIONS: We present the largest case series of foramen magnum region AVFs to date and show that clinical features relate to angioarchitecture. Orbital symptoms are frequent when sinus reflux is present. Hemorrhage was only observed in type 3 and 4 fistulas.
Authors: Diego San Millán Ruíz; Philippe Gailloud; Daniel A Rüfenacht; Jacqueline Delavelle; Frank Henry; Jean H D Fasel Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Björn Spittau; Diego San Millán; Saad El-Sherifi; Claudia Hader; Tejinder Pal Singh; Edith Motschall; Werner Vach; Horst Urbach; Stephan Meckel Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2014-11-21 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Jong Won Choi; Byung Moon Kim; Dong Joon Kim; Dong Ik Kim; Sang Hyun Suh; Na-Young Shin; Jin Goo Lee Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2013-05-31 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: M Travis Caton; Andrew L Callen; Alexander Z Copelan; Kazim H Narsinh; Eric R Smith; Matthew R Amans Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2020-09-02 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Mohammed A Azab; Emma R Dioso; Matthew C Findlay; Jayson Nelson; Cameron A Rawanduzy; Philip Johansen; Brandon Lucke-Wold Journal: J Rare Dis Orphan Drugs Date: 2022-06-07