| Literature DB >> 33957879 |
Lili Li1, Jingjing Wang2, Shaoying Guo2, Yangqi Xing2, Xiongwen Ke2, Yinghao Chen2, Yuan He1, Shun Wang3, Jiayu Wang4, Xinwu Cui5, Zhihua Wang6,7, Lixu Tang8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tai Chi exercise has been reported to enhance physical and mental health in the older adults; however, the mechanism remains elusive. TRIALEntities:
Keywords: Ageing; Cerebrovascular function; Healthy ageing; Tai Chi
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33957879 PMCID: PMC8101197 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02196-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Geriatr ISSN: 1471-2318 Impact factor: 3.921
Fig. 1Flow chart of the study. Flow chart demonstrating the included subjects in each step of analysis during the entire procedure
Physical activities and exercise frequency of Young, Older and Tai Chi subjects
| Group | Frequency | Tai Chi | Dancing | Jogging | Walking | Others |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2/week | 2 (1.96 %) | 1 (0.98 %) | 10 (9.8 %) | 0 | 12 (11.76 %) | |
| > 2/week | 2 (1.96 %) | 0 | 11 (10.78 %) | 0 | 27 (26.47 %) | |
| everyday | 6 (5.88 %) | 0 | 9 (8.82 %) | 0 | 17 (16.67 %) | |
| sum | 10 (9.8 %) | 1 (0.98 %) | 30 (29.41 %) | 0 | 56 (54.90 %) | |
| 2/week | 0 | 6 (3.57 %) | 5 (2.98 %) | 7 (4.17 %) | 31 (18.45 %) | |
| > 2/week | 0 | 10 (5.95 %) | 5 (2.98 %) | 5 (2.98 %) | 14 (8.33 %) | |
| everyday | 0 | 11 (6.55 %) | 7 (4.17 %) | 8 (4.76 %) | 18 (10.71 %) | |
| sum | 0 | 27 (16.07 %) | 17 (10.12 %) | 20 (11.91 %) | 63 (37.5 %) | |
| 2/week | 14 (8.33 %) | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.60 %) | 2 (1.19 %) | |
| > 2/week | 38 (22.62 %) | 3 (1.79 %) | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.60 %) | |
| everyday | 116 (69.05 %) | 9 (5.36 %) | 3 (1.79 %) | 4 (2.38 %) | 0 | |
| sum | 168 (100 %) | 12 (7.14 %) | 3 (1.79 %) | 5 (2.98 %) | 3 (1.79 %) | |
Data were shown as number (percentage). #In the Tai Chi group, all of the participants regularly practice Tai Chi, whereas 36 subjects among them also participate in other sports practices
Fig. 2Cerebrovascular declines along with age . a Spearman’s correlation coefficient profiles of clinical indices with ages in older adults. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01 and ∗∗∗P < 0.001. b-e Spearman’s correlation profiling (left) and comparisons between the young and the older adults (right) for age-related indices including SBP (b), CVHI Score (c), Vmean (d), Vmin (e). BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; CVHI, cerebral vascular hemodynamics indices; Qmean, mean blood flow rate; Vmean, mean blood flow velocity; Vmax, maximum blood flow velocity; Vmin, minimum blood flow velocity; Wv, pulse wave velocity; Zcv, characteristic impedance; DI, dilatability; Rv, resistance vascular; DR, dynamic resistance; CP, critical pressure; DP, diastolic pressure and critical pressure difference. ∗∗∗P < 0.001
Basal characteristics of the young and the matched older adult controls and Tai Chi players
| Young ( | Older ( | Tai Chi ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (y) | 23.25 ± 1.11 | 63.7 ± 2.54 | 63.79 ± 2.51 | 0.762 |
| Sex (female) | 53 (52.0 %) | 95 (56.5 %) | 95 (56.5 %) | 1 |
| Body weight (kg) | 62.96 ± 10.09 | 63.18 ± 10.35 | 63.92 ± 9.54 | 0.496 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.18 ± 2.52 | 24.12 ± 3.09 | 24.17 ± 2.96 | 0.886 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 115.37 ± 12.74 | 137.55 ± 18.48 | 136.8 ± 16.38 | 0.691 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 68.98 ± 8.52 | 77.03 ± 10.62 | 78.08 ± 10.09 | 0.352 |
| Heart rate (bmp) | 69.35 ± 11.04 | 75.02 ± 11.65 | 73.51 ± 11.29 | 0.227 |
Values are mean ± SD or n (%)
BMI body mass index; SBP systolic blood pressure; DBP diastolic blood pressure
P values are calculated by comparing older adult control group with the Tai Chi group
Impact of Tai Chi practice on cerebrovascular hemodynamics
| Young ( | Older ( | Tai Chi ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVHI Score | 92.25 (86.63–97) | 86.63 (72.25–95) | 91 (81.25–98.31) | 0.002 |
| Qmean (cm/s) | 9.55 (8.42–11.2) | 9.18 (8.48–10.31) | 9.6 (8.73–10.39) | 0.151 |
| Vmean (cm/s) | 22.72 (21.15–24.5) | 17.58 (15.87–19.56) | 18.35 (16.86–20.62) | 0.014 |
| Vmax (cm/s) | 49.61 (45.91–53.51) | 36.59 (33.23–39.91) | 38.23 (33.92–41.43) | 0.04 |
| Vmin (cm/s) | 11.52 (10.33–12.4) | 8.27 (7.38–9.15) | 8.56 (7.97–10.04) | < 0.001 |
| Wv (m/s) | 9.97 (7.99–12.44) | 19.87 (15.5–23.96) | 18.04 (14.19–22.24) | 0.022 |
| Zcv (kPa·s/m) | 10.46 (8.4–13.06) | 20.87 (16.28–25.16) | 18.94 (14.9–23.36) | 0.021 |
| DI | 0.96 (0.77–1.2) | 0.53 (0.43–0.66) | 0.54 (0.44–0.66) | 0.606 |
| Rv (kPa·s/m) | 49.52 (44.18–56.78) | 75.12 (64.4–90.8) | 71.56 (63.69–81.15) | 0.044 |
| DR (kPa·s/m) | 27.03 (23.71–31.71) | 45.83 (34.88–54.69) | 42.57 (34.34–52.45) | 0.144 |
| CP (kPa·s/m) | 5.35 (4.14–6.27) | 5.92 (4.51–7.05) | 5.85 (4.46–6.91) | 0.876 |
| DP (kPa) | 3.19 (2.72–3.82) | 3.68 (2.94–4.49) | 3.73 (3.05–4.48) | 0.515 |
Data are median (25th -75th ). Variables are analyzed with Mann-Whitney U test for comparisons. P < 0.05 is considered statistically significant for two-tailed tests
P values are calculated by comparing older adults control group with the Tai Chi group. CVHI cerebral vascular hemodynamics indices; Qmean mean blood flow rate; Vmean mean blood flow velocity; Vmax maximum blood flow velocity; Vmin minimum blood flow velocity; Wv pulse wave velocity; Zcv characteristic impedance; DI dilatability; Rv resistance vascular; DR dynamic resistance; CP critical pressure; DP diastolic pressure and critical pressure difference