Literature DB >> 33957807

Labor Market Concentration and Worker Contributions to Health Insurance Premiums.

Mark K Meiselbach1, Matthew D Eisenberg1, Ge Bai1,2, Aditi Sen1, Gerard F Anderson1.   

Abstract

In concentrated labor markets, where workers have fewer employers to choose from, employers may exploit their monopsony power by contributing less to workers' health benefits. This study examined if labor market concentration was associated with higher worker contributions to health plan premiums. We combined publicly available data from the Census to calculate labor market concentration and the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Insurance/Employer Component to determine premium contributions from 2010 to 2016 for metropolitan areas. After controlling for year fixed-effects and market characteristics, we found that higher labor market concentration was associated with higher worker contributions to health plan premiums, lower take-home income, and no change in employer contributions to premiums, consistent with the hypothesis that greater labor market concentration is associated with less generous health benefits. When evaluating the effects of mergers and acquisitions on labor markets, regulatory agencies should critically assess worker contributions to health insurance premiums.

Entities:  

Keywords:  employer-sponsored insurance; health insurance premiums; labor market concentration; private insurance

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33957807      PMCID: PMC9428934          DOI: 10.1177/10775587211012992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care Res Rev        ISSN: 1077-5587            Impact factor:   2.971


  10 in total

1.  Employee demand for health insurance and employer health plan choices.

Authors:  M Kate Bundorf
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Contracting with limited commitment: evidence from employment-based health insurance contracts.

Authors:  Keith J Crocker; John R Moran
Journal:  Rand J Econ       Date:  2003

3.  The incidence of mandated maternity benefits.

Authors:  J Gruber
Journal:  Am Econ Rev       Date:  1994-06

4.  The Growing Difference Between Public And Private Payment Rates For Inpatient Hospital Care.

Authors:  Thomas M Selden; Zeynal Karaca; Patricia Keenan; Chapin White; Richard Kronick
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Who really pays for health insurance? The incidence of employer-provided health insurance with sticky nominal wages.

Authors:  Benjamin D Sommers
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2005-03

6.  Health insurance, cost expectations, and adverse job turnover.

Authors:  Randall P Ellis; Ching-To Albert Ma
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Who pays for public employee health costs?

Authors:  Jeffrey Clemens; David M Cutler
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.883

8.  Employment and Adverse Selection in Health Insurance.

Authors:  Jayanta Bhattacharya; William B Vogt
Journal:  Forum Health Econ Policy       Date:  2014-01-01

9.  Mandate-based health reform and the labor market: Evidence from the Massachusetts reform.

Authors:  Jonathan T Kolstad; Amanda E Kowalski
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.883

10.  Health Care Spending in the United States and Other High-Income Countries.

Authors:  Irene Papanicolas; Liana R Woskie; Ashish K Jha
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 56.272

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.