Literature DB >> 33957761

A Prognostic Model for Predicting One-Month Outcomes among Emergency Department Patients with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and a Presenting Glasgow Coma Scale of Fifteen.

Hayley Falk1, Kathleen T Bechtold2, Matthew E Peters3, Durga Roy3, Vani Rao3, Mariel Lavieri4, Haris Sair5, Timothy E Van Meter6, Frederick Korley7.   

Abstract

The lack of well-performing prognostic models for early prognostication of outcomes remains a major barrier to improving the clinical care of patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). We aimed to derive a prognostic model for predicting incomplete recovery at 1-month in emergency department (ED) patients with mTBI and a presenting Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 15 who were enrolled in the HeadSMART (Head Injury Serum Markers for Assessing Response to Trauma) study. The derivation cohort included 355 participants with complete baseline (day-of-injury) and follow-up data. The primary outcome measure was the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) at 1-month and incomplete recovery was defined as a GOSE <8. At 1-month post-injury, incomplete recovery was present in 58% (n = 205) of participants. The final multi-variable logistic regression model included six variables: age in years (odds ratio [OR] = 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.97-1.00), positive head CT (OR = 4.42; 95% CI: 2.21-9.33), history of depression (OR = 2.59; 95% CI: 1.47-4.69), and self-report of moderate or severe headache (OR = 2.49; 95% CI: 1.49-4.18), difficulty concentrating (OR = 3.17; 95% CI: 1.53-7.04), and photophobia (OR = 4.17; 95% CI: 2.08-8.92) on the day-of-injury. The model was validated internally using bootstrap resampling (1000 resamples), which revealed a mean over-optimism value of 0.01 and an optimism-corrected area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.75-0.85). A prognostic model for predicting incomplete recovery among ED patients with mTBI and a presenting GCS of 15 using easily obtainable clinical and demographic variables has acceptable discriminative accuracy. External validation of this model is warranted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended; outcome prediction; prognostic model; traumatic brain injury

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33957761     DOI: 10.1089/neu.2021.0137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  3 in total

1.  Outcomes in Patients With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Without Acute Intracranial Traumatic Injury.

Authors:  Debbie Y Madhok; Robert M Rodriguez; Jason Barber; Nancy R Temkin; Amy J Markowitz; Natalie Kreitzer; Geoffrey T Manley
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-08-01

2.  Post-Concussion Symptoms Rule: Derivation and Validation of a Clinical Decision Rule for Early Prediction of Persistent Symptoms after a Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Natalie Le Sage; Jean-Marc Chauny; Simon Berthelot; Patrick Archambault; Xavier Neveu; Lynne Moore; Valérie Boucher; Jérôme Frenette; Élaine De Guise; Marie-Christine Ouellet; Jacques Lee; Andrew D McRae; Eddy Lang; Marcel Émond; Éric Mercier; Pier-Alexandre Tardif; Bonnie Swaine; Peter Cameron; Jeffrey J Perry
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 4.869

3.  Defining Acute Traumatic Encephalopathy: Methods of the "HEAD Injury Serum Markers and Multi-Modalities for Assessing Response to Trauma" (HeadSMART II) Study.

Authors:  W Frank Peacock; Damon Kuehl; Jeff Bazarian; Adam J Singer; Chad Cannon; Zubaid Rafique; James P d'Etienne; Robert Welch; Carol Clark; Ramon Diaz-Arrastia
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 4.003

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.