Literature DB >> 33957219

Low dose radiation therapy for severe COVID-19 pneumonia: a randomized double-blind study.

Alexandros Papachristofilou1, Tobias Finazzi2, Andrea Blum3, Tatjana Zehnder3, Núria Zellweger3, Jens Lustenberger4, Tristan Bauer4, Christian Dott4, Yasar Avcu4, Götz Kohler4, Frank Zimmermann4, Hans Pargger3, Martin Siegemund3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The morbidity and mortality of patients requiring mechanical ventilation for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia is considerable. We studied the use of whole-lung low dose radiation therapy (LDRT) in this patient cohort. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and requiring mechanical ventilation for COVID-19 pneumonia were included in this randomized double-blind study. Patients were randomized to 1 Gy whole-lung LDRT or sham irradiation (sham-RT). Treatment group allocation was concealed from patients and ICU clinicians, who treated patients according to the current standard of care. Patients were followed for the primary endpoint of ventilator-free days (VFDs) at day 15 post-intervention. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, as well as changes in oxygenation and inflammatory markers.
RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were randomized to either whole-lung LDRT or sham-RT between November and December 2020. Patients were generally elderly and comorbid, with a median age of 75 years in both arms. No difference in 15-day VFDs was observed between groups (p = 1.00), with a median of 0 days (range, 0-9) in the LDRT arm, and 0 days (range, 0-13) in the sham-RT arm. Overall survival at 28 days was identical at 63.6% (95%CI, 40.7-99.5%) in both arms (p = 0.69). Apart from a more pronounced reduction in lymphocyte counts following LDRT (p < 0.01), analyses of secondary endpoints revealed no significant differences between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Whole-lung LDRT failed to improve clinical outcomes in critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation for COVID-19 pneumonia.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33957219      PMCID: PMC8091806          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.04.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


The Publisher regrets that this article is an accidental duplication of an article that has already been published,  http://dx.doi.org 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.02.054. The duplicate article has therefore been withdrawn. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal
  1 in total

1.  Separating evidence from opinion - In regards to [XXX] et al.

Authors:  Tobias Finazzi; Alexandros Papachristofilou; Martin Siegemund
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 7.038

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.