Literature DB >> 33957077

Whole-genome analysis of giraffe supports four distinct species.

Raphael T F Coimbra1, Sven Winter2, Vikas Kumar3, Klaus-Peter Koepfli4, Rebecca M Gooley4, Pavel Dobrynin5, Julian Fennessy6, Axel Janke7.   

Abstract

Species is the fundamental taxonomic unit in biology and its delimitation has implications for conservation. In giraffe (Giraffa spp.), multiple taxonomic classifications have been proposed since the early 1900s.1 However, one species with nine subspecies has been generally accepted,2 likely due to limited in-depth assessments, subspecies hybridizing in captivity,3,4 and anecdotal reports of hybrids in the wild.5 Giraffe taxonomy received new attention after population genetic studies using traditional genetic markers suggested at least four species.6,7 This view has been met with controversy,8 setting the stage for debate.9,10 Genomics is significantly enhancing our understanding of biodiversity and speciation relative to traditional genetic approaches and thus has important implications for species delineation and conservation.11 We present a high-quality de novo genome assembly of the critically endangered Kordofan giraffe (G. camelopardalis antiquorum)12 and a comprehensive whole-genome analysis of 50 giraffe representing all traditionally recognized subspecies. Population structure and phylogenomic analyses support four separately evolving giraffe lineages, which diverged 230-370 ka ago. These lineages underwent distinct demographic histories and show different levels of heterozygosity and inbreeding. Our results strengthen previous findings of limited gene flow and admixture among putative giraffe species6,7,9 and establish a genomic foundation for recognizing four species and seven subspecies, the latter of which should be considered as evolutionary significant units. Achieving a consensus over the number of species and subspecies in giraffe is essential for adequately assessing their threat level and will improve conservation efforts for these iconic taxa.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Giraffa; chromium de novo assembly; demographic inference; giraffe; multispecies coalescent; phylogenetic network; population structure; runs of homozygosity; speciation; whole-genome sequencing

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33957077     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.04.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  6 in total

1.  Phylogenomics and species delimitation of the economically important Black Basses (Micropterus).

Authors:  Daemin Kim; Andrew T Taylor; Thomas J Near
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Foot shape and radiographs of free-ranging Nubian giraffe in Uganda.

Authors:  Liza Dadone; Steve Foxworth; Robert Aruho; Amy Schilz; Andrea Joyet; Myra Barrett; Peter Morkel; Garrett Crooks; Julian Fennessy; Matthew S Johnston
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Cryopreservation of Giraffe Epidydimal Spermatozoa Using Different Extenders and Cryoprotectants.

Authors:  Robert Hermes; Alexis Lecu; Romain Potier; Frank Goeritz; Jessica P Rickard; Julia Bohner; Rudy Wedlarski; Jiri Hruby; Thomas B Hildebrandt
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Conservation Genomics of Two Threatened Subspecies of Northern Giraffe: The West African and the Kordofan Giraffe.

Authors:  Raphael T F Coimbra; Sven Winter; Barbara Mitchell; Julian Fennessy; Axel Janke
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 4.096

5.  The relevance of pedigrees in the conservation genomics era.

Authors:  Stephanie J Galla; Liz Brown; Yvette Couch-Lewis Ngāi Tahu Te Hapū O Ngāti Wheke Ngāti Waewae; Ilina Cubrinovska; Daryl Eason; Rebecca M Gooley; Jill A Hamilton; Julie A Heath; Samantha S Hauser; Emily K Latch; Marjorie D Matocq; Anne Richardson; Jana R Wold; Carolyn J Hogg; Anna W Santure; Tammy E Steeves
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 6.622

6.  Evaluating expert-based habitat suitability information of terrestrial mammals with GPS-tracking data.

Authors:  Maarten J E Broekman; Jelle P Hilbers; Mark A J Huijbregts; Thomas Mueller; Abdullahi H Ali; Henrik Andrén; Jeanne Altmann; Malin Aronsson; Nina Attias; Hattie L A Bartlam-Brooks; Floris M van Beest; Jerrold L Belant; Dean E Beyer; Laura Bidner; Niels Blaum; Randall B Boone; Mark S Boyce; Michael B Brown; Francesca Cagnacci; Rok Černe; Simon Chamaillé-Jammes; Nandintsetseg Dejid; Jasja Dekker; Arnaud L J Desbiez; Samuel L Díaz-Muñoz; Julian Fennessy; Claudia Fichtel; Christina Fischer; Jason T Fisher; Ilya Fischhoff; Adam T Ford; John M Fryxell; Benedikt Gehr; Jacob R Goheen; Morgan Hauptfleisch; A J Mark Hewison; Robert Hering; Marco Heurich; Lynne A Isbell; René Janssen; Florian Jeltsch; Petra Kaczensky; Peter M Kappeler; Miha Krofel; Scott LaPoint; A David M Latham; John D C Linnell; A Catherine Markham; Jenny Mattisson; Emilia Patricia Medici; Guilherme de Miranda Mourão; Bram Van Moorter; Ronaldo G Morato; Nicolas Morellet; Atle Mysterud; Stephen Mwiu; John Odden; Kirk A Olson; Aivars Ornicāns; Nives Pagon; Manuela Panzacchi; Jens Persson; Tyler Petroelje; Christer Moe Rolandsen; David Roshier; Daniel I Rubenstein; Sonia Saïd; Albert R Salemgareyev; Hall Sawyer; Niels Martin Schmidt; Nuria Selva; Agnieszka Sergiel; Jared Stabach; Jenna Stacy-Dawes; Frances E C Stewart; Jonas Stiegler; Olav Strand; Siva Sundaresan; Nathan J Svoboda; Wiebke Ullmann; Ulrich Voigt; Jake Wall; Martin Wikelski; Christopher C Wilmers; Filip Zięba; Tomasz Zwijacz-Kozica; Aafke M Schipper; Marlee A Tucker
Journal:  Glob Ecol Biogeogr       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 6.909

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.