Literature DB >> 33956502

Frequency of KRAS p.Gly12Cys Mutation in Brazilian Patients With Lung Cancer.

Rodrigo Cavagna1, Flávia Escremim de Paula2, Débora Sant'Anna1, Iara Santana2,3, Vinicius D da Silva3, Eduardo C A da Silva3, Carlos E Bacchi4, José E Miziara5, Josiane M Dias6, Pedro De Marchi1,6,7, Leticia F Leal1,8, Rui M Reis1,2,9,10.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33956502      PMCID: PMC8162527          DOI: 10.1200/GO.20.00615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol        ISSN: 2687-8941


× No keyword cloud information.

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer is the deadliest cancer worldwide, and in Brazil.[1,2] In the past decade, targeted therapies have revolutionized the clinical management of lung cancer, particularly in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) subtype.[3-8] The most successful examples of targeted therapies are the EGFR and ALK inhibitors, used for EGFR-mutated and ALK-translocated tumors, respectively.[9,10] KRAS is one of the most frequently mutated genes in NSCLC. The frequency of KRAS mutations varies among distinct populations, accounting for approximately 25% in Whites and < 10% in East Asians.[11] KRAS driver mutations are mostly located in codons 12 and 13, and the most frequent one is the p.Gly12Cys (c.34G>T) mutation.[12-18] In lung cancer, KRAS mutations are associated with smokers and with a more aggressive phenotype.[12,19-22] Efforts have been made in the past decade for rendering KRAS mutations susceptible to targeting.[23] However, until lately, KRAS-mutated tumors were, unfortunately, undruggable.[10] Recently, the agents AMG-510 (sotorasib, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA) and MRTX849 (adagrasib, Mirati Therapeutics, San Diego, CA) were developed to target the KRAS p.Gly12Cys mutation.[24,25] These specific inhibitors locked KRAS p.Gly12Cys mutation in an inactive state, hampering the oncogenic signals and allowed the normal function of remained wild-type KRAS.[24-26] In a phase I study, 32.2% (19 out of 59) of sotorasib-treated patients presented with objective response, and 88.1% (52 out of 59) presented with the disease control.[26] In a phase I and II study, 94% (17 out of 18) adagrasib-treated lung patients presented with disease control, and objective response was not yet available (KRYSTAL-1 study; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03785249).[25] The frequency of KRAS p.Gly12Cys in admixture NSCLC populations remains scarce. Herein, we report the frequency of the KRAS p.Gly12Cys mutation in a series of 844 Brazilian NSCLC cases, followed by the data gathered from Brazil's previously reported studies.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 844 patients diagnosed with NSCLC. Seven hundred fifty-four patients were diagnosed at Barretos Cancer Hospital (BCH), and 90 patients were diagnosed at Bacchi Laboratory. Tobacco exposure, performance status, and overall survival data were provided for a subset of patients (BCH). This study was approved by the local IRB (Project no. 630/2012), and all procedures were performed following the Helsinki Declaration. KRAS mutational status was evaluated from FFPE tumor tissue using different methodologies. The cases diagnosed at Barretos Cancer Hospital from 2014 to 2017 (n = 319) were genotyped by polymerase chain reaction followed by direct Sanger sequencing, and from 2018 to 2020 (n = 435) was assessed by next-generation sequencing, using the TruSight Tumor 15 (Illumina Waltham, MA) as reported by our group.[12,27,28] The cases diagnosed at Bacchi Laboratory were analyzed by qPCR TaqMan-MGB allelic discrimination assay (n = 67) and by FoundationOne (n = 23) between 2018 and 2020.[29,30] Genetic ancestry was analyzed in a subset of patients from Barretos Cancer Hospital (n = 660 out of 844), as previously described.[12] For statistical analysis, the percentage was used to describe categorical variables, and medians were used to describe continuous variables. Fisher’s exact test and χ2 test were used for the association between KRAS mutations and the clinicopathogic data. The log-rank test and the Kaplan-Meier curves were used to analyze patients’ overall survival. The Cox regression method was used to investigate the association of clinicopathologic data to the outcome (death). All tests were made in the software IBM SPSS Statistics version 22 with a limit of statistical significance of 0.05.

RESULTS

We evaluated the frequency of KRAS mutations in a series of 844 NSCLC (Table 1). The median age of the cohort was 64 years, 55.4% (n = 468 out of 844) were male, 88.2% (n = 744 out of 844) were adenocarcinoma, and 2.2% (n = 19 out of 844) were squamous-cell carcinoma. Concerning tobacco consumption, 63.5% (n = 536 out of 844) were current or quitter smoking, 65.3% (n = 552 out of 754) were diagnosed in an advanced stage of the disease, and 9.7% (n = 82 out of 844) were diagnosed with worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS; Table 1).
TABLE 1

Association of Patients' Characteristics and KRAS Mutational Status

Association of Patients' Characteristics and KRAS Mutational Status KRAS was mutated in 214 cases (25.3%; Table 1). A detailed description of KRAS mutation variants is described at Appendix Table A1. Briefly, in the adenocarcinoma subtype, 26.2% (n = 195 out of 744) were KRAS-mutated, with p.Gly12Cys being the most frequent mutation identified in 9.4% (n = 70 out of 744), followed by p.Gly12Val in 6.2% (n = 46 out of 744). Among squamous-cell carcinomas, 5.3% (n = 1 out of 19) were KRAS-mutated (p.Gly12Asp). Concerning other histologies, 22.2% (n = 18 out of 81) were KRAS-mutated, with p.Gly12Cys being the most frequent mutation identified in 7.4% (n = 6 out of 81; Appendix Table A1).
TABLE A1

Frequency of KRAS Mutations Identified According to Histology of the Tumor (n = 214)

The genetic ancestry evaluation in a subset of patients (n = 660 out of 844) showed the following proportion of ancestry background: 72.2% for European, 14.0% for African, 6.4% for Asian, and 7.5% for Native American (Fig 1A).
FIG 1

(A) Ancestry background of patients, divided in mutated patients and wild-type patients (n = 660). (B) Kaplan-Meier comparing wild-type patients with mutated patients. AFR, African; AME, Native American; ASN, Asian; EUR, European; WT, wild-type.

(A) Ancestry background of patients, divided in mutated patients and wild-type patients (n = 660). (B) Kaplan-Meier comparing wild-type patients with mutated patients. AFR, African; AME, Native American; ASN, Asian; EUR, European; WT, wild-type. KRAS mutation status was further associated with clinicopathologic and ancestry features (Table 1). Significant associations were found between the presence of KRAS mutations and smoking status, ECOG PS at diagnosis, and Native American ancestry (Table 1). Patients harboring KRAS mutation had worse overall survival than wild-type patients (Fig 1B). Besides, smoking and higher ECOG PS at diagnosis were significantly associated with higher risk of death by multivariate Cox regression analysis (P < .0001 and P < .0001, respectively). We further gathered KRAS mutational status reported in the NSCLC Brazilian population (Table 2; Fig 2). Among the 3,247 cases, the KRAS mutational frequency was 25.0% (n = 813 out of 3,247)—ranging from 15% to 31% among studies (Table 2). The KRAS p.Gly12Cys mutation frequency was 35.0% (n = 285 out of 813) of the KRAS-mutated cases, corresponding to 9% (285 out of 3,247) of all Brazilian NSCLC cases—ranging from 6.0% to 12.0% (Table 2; Fig 2).
TABLE 2

Frequency of KRAS Mutations in Brazilian Patients

FIG 2

Frequency of KRAS mutations in Brazilian patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (n = 3,247).

Frequency of KRAS Mutations in Brazilian Patients Frequency of KRAS mutations in Brazilian patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (n = 3,247).

DISCUSSION

The KRAS p.Gly12Cys mutation became a new target for personalized therapy with the sotorasib and adagrasib.[23,25,26,31] Our study analyzed the frequency of p.Gly12Cys mutation in the Brazilian NSCLC population. We observed that 25% of the 3,247 cases were KRAS-mutated, and the most common variant was the p.Gly12Cys, present in 285 (9%) of the cases. Currently, expanded access is available for Brazilian patients and also for patients around the world, since both are non–US Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs. Once US Food and Drug Administration approves any of these drugs—sotorasib and adagrasib—compassionate drug use may be the option for obtaining access for Brazilian patients. In our study, the presence of KRAS mutations was associated with smoking status (current or quitter) and worse overall survival. These data are in agreement with the literature.[12,19-22] A recent review reported that KRAS mutations are present in 18%-32% of lung adenocarcinoma, 12.8% of large cell carcinoma, 10% of adenosquamous carcinomas, and 1.6%-7.1% of squamous-cell carcinomas in White patients.[32] Moreover, African-American patients with NSCLC are more frequently identified with KRAS mutations than White patients.[32] The frequency of KRAS mutations in Western populations with lung adenocarcinoma is about 26% and about 6% in the squamous-cell carcinoma population.[33] In Asian patients, the frequency of KRAS mutations is 11.2% of patients with NSCLC.[33] According to The Cancer Genome Atlas, KRAS mutations are found in 33% of lung adenocarcinoma.[34] A study involving 5,738 NSCLC cases reported 14% of KRAS-mutated cases in Latin American except for Brazil (Argentina, Mexico, Colombia, Peru, Costa Rica, and Panama).[35] The role of genetic ancestry in KRAS mutational status in NSCLC is poorly explored. A recent metadata analysis showed that KRAS mutations were more present in White and Black NSCLC patient groups than in Asian.[36] In a previous study, our group reported that KRAS mutations were associated with low Asian genetic ancestry background.[12] In the current study, using a panel of genetic ancestry markers, these findings were not confirmed in a multivariate analysis. Therefore, further studies using an admixture of populations are needed to clarify this important issue. In conclusion, we showed that approximately 10% of Brazilian patients with NSCLC harbor the KRAS p.Gly12Cys variant and are therefore potentially responsive to the new anti-KRAS agents.
  33 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of epidermal growth factor polymorphisms and cancer risk: involving 9,779 cases and 15,932 controls.

Authors:  Teng-Fei Li; Ke-Wei Ren; Peng-Fei Liu
Journal:  DNA Cell Biol       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.311

Review 2.  RAS-targeted therapies: is the undruggable drugged?

Authors:  Amanda R Moore; Scott C Rosenberg; Frank McCormick; Shiva Malek
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 3.  Beyond ALK-RET, ROS1 and other oncogene fusions in lung cancer.

Authors:  Takashi Kohno; Takashi Nakaoku; Koji Tsuta; Katsuya Tsuchihara; Shingo Matsumoto; Kiyotaka Yoh; Koichi Goto
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-04

4.  Mutational Profiling of Driver Tumor Suppressor and Oncogenic Genes in Brazilian Malignant Pleural Mesotheliomas.

Authors:  Nathália C Campanella; Eduardo Caetano Silva; Gustavo Dix; Fabiana de Lima Vazquez; Flávia Escremim de Paula; Gustavo N Berardinelli; Marcelo Balancin; Roger Chammas; Rossana V Mendoza Lopez; Henrique César S Silveira; Vera Luiza Capelozzi; Rui Manuel Reis
Journal:  Pathobiology       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Updated Frequency of EGFR and KRAS Mutations in NonSmall-Cell Lung Cancer in Latin America: The Latin-American Consortium for the Investigation of Lung Cancer (CLICaP).

Authors:  Oscar Arrieta; Andrés F Cardona; Claudio Martín; Luis Más-López; Luis Corrales-Rodríguez; Guillermo Bramuglia; Omar Castillo-Fernandez; Matthew Meyerson; Eduardo Amieva-Rivera; Alma Delia Campos-Parra; Hernán Carranza; Juan Carlos Gómez de la Torre; Yanina Powazniak; Fernando Aldaco-Sarvide; Carlos Vargas; Mariana Trigo; Manuel Magallanes-Maciel; Jorge Otero; Roberto Sánchez-Reyes; Mauricio Cuello
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 15.609

6.  Association of KRAS and EGFR mutations with survival in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Melissa L Johnson; Camelia S Sima; Jamie Chaft; Paul K Paik; William Pao; Mark G Kris; Marc Ladanyi; Gregory J Riely
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  The EGF receptor family as targets for cancer therapy.

Authors:  J Mendelsohn; J Baselga
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2000-12-27       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  Epidermal growth factor receptor and KRAS mutations in Brazilian lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Carlos E Bacchi; Heloísa Ciol; Eduardo M Queiroga; Lucimara C Benine; Luciana H Silva; Elida B Ojopi
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.365

9.  Mutational profile of Brazilian lung adenocarcinoma unveils association of EGFR mutations with high Asian ancestry and independent prognostic role of KRAS mutations.

Authors:  Letícia Ferro Leal; Flávia Escremim de Paula; Pedro De Marchi; Luciano de Souza Viana; Gustavo Dix Junqueira Pinto; Carolina Dias Carlos; Gustavo Noriz Berardinelli; José Elias Miziara; Carlos Maciel da Silva; Eduardo Caetano Albino Silva; Rui Pereira; Marco Antonio de Oliveira; Cristovam Scapulatempo-Neto; Rui Manuel Reis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Mutation incidence and coincidence in non small-cell lung cancer: meta-analyses by ethnicity and histology (mutMap).

Authors:  S Dearden; J Stevens; Y-L Wu; D Blowers
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 32.976

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Daily Practice Assessment of KRAS Status in NSCLC Patients: A New Challenge for the Thoracic Pathologist Is Right around the Corner.

Authors:  Christophe Bontoux; Véronique Hofman; Patrick Brest; Marius Ilié; Baharia Mograbi; Paul Hofman
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 6.639

2.  Efficacy of Combined Use of Everolimus and Second-Generation Pan-EGRF Inhibitors in KRAS Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cell Lines.

Authors:  Renato José da Silva-Oliveira; Izabela Natalia Faria Gomes; Luciane Sussuchi da Silva; André van Helvoort Lengert; Ana Carolina Laus; Matias Eliseo Melendez; Carla Carolina Munari; Fernanda de Paula Cury; Giovanna Barbarini Longato; Rui Manuel Reis
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 6.208

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.