Literature DB >> 33956295

A Closer Look at Relationship Structures: Relationship Satisfaction and Attachment Among People Who Practice Hierarchical and Non-Hierarchical Polyamory.

Sharon M Flicker1, Flavia Sancier-Barbosa2, Amy C Moors3,4, Lindsay Browne5.   

Abstract

Although polyamorous relationships have received increasing attention from researchers over the past decade, little attention has been paid to differences in relationship configurations: some individuals arrange their relationships hierarchically, prioritizing a primary partner; other relationship structures are non-hierarchical with no relationships prioritized over others. Across two samples (NStudy1= 225; NStudy2= 360), we compared relationship satisfaction and attachment security between individuals in hierarchical and non-hierarchical configurations. Greater variability in attachment security was found between partners in hierarchical relationships than those in non-hierarchical relationships; no significant differences were found in variability in relationships satisfaction across these groups. Furthermore, individuals in hierarchical relationships reported lower overall relationship satisfaction and attachment security compared to individuals in non-hierarchical relationships. More specifically, although no significant differences were found between non-hierarchical and primary partners, participants reported lower relationship satisfaction and attachment security with secondary and tertiary partners compared to non-hierarchical and primary partners. Findings suggest that these differences may attenuate with time. Although previous research has found that differences (e.g., in investment) between partners exist in both non-hierarchical and hierarchical configurations, the current research suggests that differences that occur organically rather than in a predetermined manner may be related to greater similarities in attachment security across partners as well as greater overall levels of relationship satisfaction and attachment security for individuals in non-hierarchical configurations. More research is needed to determine whether the observed between-partner differences are consistent with the relationship goals of individuals in hierarchical relationships.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attachment; Consensual non-monogamy; Hierarchy; Polyamory; Relationship anarchy; Relationship quality

Year:  2021        PMID: 33956295     DOI: 10.1007/s10508-020-01875-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  13 in total

1.  Within-person variation in security of attachment: a self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need fulfillment, and well-being.

Authors:  J G La Guardia; R M Ryan; C E Couchman; E L Deci
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2000-09

2.  Attachment change processes in the early years of marriage.

Authors:  J Davila; B R Karney; T N Bradbury
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1999-05

3.  Testing the ruler with item response theory: increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index.

Authors:  Janette L Funk; Ronald D Rogge
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2007-12

Review 4.  The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: a review of theory, method, and research.

Authors:  B R Karney; T N Bradbury
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  The Experiences in Close Relationships-Relationship Structures questionnaire: a method for assessing attachment orientations across relationships.

Authors:  R Chris Fraley; Marie E Heffernan; Amanda M Vicary; Claudia Chloe Brumbaugh
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2011-09

6.  Comparing Relationship Quality Across Different Types of Romantic Partners in Polyamorous and Monogamous Relationships.

Authors:  Rhonda N Balzarini; Christoffer Dharma; Taylor Kohut; Lorne Campbell; Justin J Lehmiller; Jennifer J Harman; Bjarne M Holmes
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2019-05-08

Review 7.  Attachment in Adulthood: Recent Developments, Emerging Debates, and Future Directions.

Authors:  R Chris Fraley
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 24.137

8.  Need fulfillment in polyamorous relationships.

Authors:  Melissa E Mitchell; Kim Bartholomew; Rebecca J Cobb
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2013-03-29

9.  Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process.

Authors:  C Hazan; P Shaver
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1987-03

10.  Perceptions of primary and secondary relationships in polyamory.

Authors:  Rhonda N Balzarini; Lorne Campbell; Taylor Kohut; Bjarne M Holmes; Justin J Lehmiller; Jennifer J Harman; Nicole Atkins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Introduction to the Special Section on Consensual Non-Monogamy.

Authors:  Lisa Dawn Hamilton; Carm De Santis; Ashley E Thompson
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-06-04

2.  A national recruitment strategy for HIV-serodiscordant partners living in Canada for the Positive Plus One study: a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Min Xi; Sandra Bullock; Joshua B Mendelsohn; James Iveniuk; Veronika Moravan; Ann N Burchell; Darrell H S Tan; Amrita Daftary; Tamara Thompson; Bertrand Lebouché; Laura Bisaillon; Ted Myers; Liviana Calzavara
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 4.135

3.  A test of the investment model among asexual individuals: The moderating role of attachment orientation.

Authors:  Alexandra Brozowski; Hayden Connor-Kuntz; Sanaye Lewis; Sania Sinha; Jeewon Oh; Rebekka Weidmann; Jonathan R Weaver; William J Chopik
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.