Literature DB >> 33956267

Elucidating the Photoluminescence Quenching in Ensulizole: an Artificial Water Soluble Sunscreen.

Muhammad Mubeen1, Muhammad Adnan Khalid1, Maria Mukhtar1, Saba Shahrum1, Shanila Zahra1, Saima Shabbir2, Azhar Iqbal3.   

Abstract

Employing natural or artificial sunscreens is essential to protect the skin from ultraviolet radiations that cause premature aging and develop melanoma and other forms of skin cancer. The 2-Phenylbenzimidazole-5-sulfonic acid, commonly known as ensulizole is a water-soluble artificial sunscreen that absorb UV-B (280 nm - 315 nm) radiations and protects the skin against the harmful effects of these radiations. We have measured steady-state photoluminescence (SSPL) spectra and photoluminescence (PL) kinetics of this compound in various conditions. Steady-state absorption indicates a strong absorption feature at 303 nm and a weak one at 316 nm that have been identified as π → π* and n → π* transitions, respectively. The spectra of PL induced by these absorptions indicate that the PL of ensulizole is less Stokes-shifted in polar solvents and more Stokes-shifted in non-polar solvents. The average PL lifetime of ensulizole is longer in non-polar solvents than in polar solvents and it exhibits the shortest PL lifetime in aqueous medium that maximize its transition efficiency in water. This suggests in non-polar solvents intersystem crossing is the dominant mode of relaxation of the excited ππ* state. Furthermore, an increase of pH of ensulizole solution decreases the PL intensity and the lifetime. Stern-Volmer equation is employed to evaluate bimolecular quenching rate constant kq. The evaluation result suggests the diffusional dynamic mode of PL quenching is operative.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ensulizole; Photoluminescence; Quenching; Sunscreen; Time resolved

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33956267     DOI: 10.1007/s10895-021-02736-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fluoresc        ISSN: 1053-0509            Impact factor:   2.217


  32 in total

1.  Revisiting the Role of Irradiance in the Determination of Sunscreens' Sun Protection Factor.

Authors:  Aleix Bacardit; Xavier Cartoixà
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 6.475

2.  Analysis of photokinetics of 2'-ethylhexyl-4-methoxycinnamate in sunscreens.

Authors:  Bernd Herzog; Lola Amorós-Galicia; Myriam Sohn; Melanie Hofer; Katja Quass; Jochen Giesinger
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Photophysical and photochemical studies of 2-phenylbenzimidazole and UVB sunscreen 2-phenylbenzimidazole-5-sulfonic acid.

Authors:  J Johnson Inbaraj; Piotr Bilski; Colin F Chignell
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.421

4.  Interactions between different solar UVB/UVA filters contained in commercial suncreams and consequent loss of UV protection.

Authors:  Daniele Dondi; Angelo Albini; Nick Serpone
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 5.  Solar ultraviolet radiation cataract.

Authors:  Stefan Löfgren
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.467

6.  Influence of the Solvent Environment on the Ultrafast Relaxation Pathways of a Sunscreen Molecule Diethylamino Hydroxybenzoyl Hexyl Benzoate.

Authors:  Min-Hsien Kao; Ravi Kumar Venkatraman; Mahima Sneha; Matthew Wilton; Andrew J Orr-Ewing
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 2.781

7.  Environmental effects of ozone depletion, UV radiation and interactions with climate change: UNEP Environmental Effects Assessment Panel, update 2017.

Authors:  A F Bais; R M Lucas; J F Bornman; C E Williamson; B Sulzberger; A T Austin; S R Wilson; A L Andrady; G Bernhard; R L McKenzie; P J Aucamp; S Madronich; R E Neale; S Yazar; A R Young; F R de Gruijl; M Norval; Y Takizawa; P W Barnes; T M Robson; S A Robinson; C L Ballaré; S D Flint; P J Neale; S Hylander; K C Rose; S-Å Wängberg; D-P Häder; R C Worrest; R G Zepp; N D Paul; R M Cory; K R Solomon; J Longstreth; K K Pandey; H H Redhwi; A Torikai; A M Heikkilä
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 8.  Environmental effects of stratospheric ozone depletion, UV radiation and interactions with climate change: UNEP Environmental Effects Assessment Panel, update 2019.

Authors:  G H Bernhard; R E Neale; P W Barnes; P J Neale; R G Zepp; S R Wilson; A L Andrady; A F Bais; R L McKenzie; P J Aucamp; P J Young; J B Liley; R M Lucas; S Yazar; L E Rhodes; S N Byrne; L M Hollestein; C M Olsen; A R Young; T M Robson; J F Bornman; M A K Jansen; S A Robinson; C L Ballaré; C E Williamson; K C Rose; A T Banaszak; D -P Häder; S Hylander; S -Å Wängberg; A T Austin; W -C Hou; N D Paul; S Madronich; B Sulzberger; K R Solomon; H Li; T Schikowski; J Longstreth; K K Pandey; A M Heikkilä; C C White
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  A Comparison of Solar Ultraviolet Radiation Exposure in Urban Canyons in Venice, Italy and Johannesburg, South Africa.

Authors:  Caradee Y Wright; David Jean du Preez; Bice S Martincigh; Martin W Allen; Danielle A Millar; Bianca Wernecke; Suzana Blesic
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.421

10.  Ultrafast Transient Absorption Spectroscopy of the Sunscreen Constituent Ethylhexyl Triazone.

Authors:  Lewis A Baker; Sarah L Clark; Scott Habershon; Vasilios G Stavros
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 6.475

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cu-Enhanced Efficient Förster Resonance Energy Transfer in PBSA Sunscreen-Associated Ternary Cu x Cd1-x S Quantum Dots.

Authors:  Muhammad Mubeen; Muhammad Adnan Khalid; Tehreem Gul; Maria Mukhtar; Anwar Ul-Hamid; Azhar Iqbal
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-09-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.