| Literature DB >> 33956261 |
Stephan Hildebrand1, Sascha Groß-Hardt2, Thomas Schmitz-Rode3, Ulrich Steinseifer4, Sebastian Victor Jansen2.
Abstract
An in-vitro study was conducted to investigate the general feasibility of using only one pumping chamber of the SynCardia total artificial heart (TAH) as a replacement of the single ventricle palliated by Fontan circulation. A mock circulation loop was used to mimic a Fontan circulation. The combination of both ventricle sizes (50 and 70 cc) and driver (Freedom Driver and Companion C2 Driver) was investigated. Two clinical relevant scenarios (early Fontan; late Fontan) as derived from literature data were set up in the mock loop. The impact of increased transpulmonary pressure gradient, low atrial pressure, and raised central venous pressure on cardiac output was studied. From a hemodynamic point, the single-chambered TAH performed sufficiently in the setting of the Fontan circulation. Increased transpulmonary pressure gradient, from ideal to pulmonary hypertension, decreased the blood flow in combinations by almost 2 L/min. In the early Fontan scenario, a cardiac output of 3-3.5 L/min was achieved using the 50 cc ventricle, driven by the Companion C2 Driver. Even under pulmonary hypertension, cardiac outputs greater than 4 L/min could be obtained with the 70 cc pump chamber in the late Fontan scenario. In the clinically relevant Fontan scenarios, implementation of the single chambered TAH performed successfully from a hemodynamic point of view. The replacement of the failing univentricular heart by a single chamber of the SynCardia TAH may provide an alternative to a complex biventricular repair procedure or ventricular support in Fontan patients.Entities:
Keywords: Congenital heart disease; Fontan circulation; Mock circulation loop (MCL); Single ventricle; Total artificial heart (TAH)
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33956261 PMCID: PMC8866354 DOI: 10.1007/s10047-021-01273-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Artif Organs ISSN: 1434-7229 Impact factor: 1.731
Fig. 1Mock circulation loop, a schematic: active elements (orange): systemic and pulmonary arterial compliance (CSA, CPA), systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance (RS, RP) and venous reservoir (VR); measurements (blue diamonds): aortic pressure (AoP), pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), left atrial pressure (LAP), central venous pressure (CVP), cardiac output (CO); left atrium (LA), pulmonary and aortic graft (PG, AG), systemic and pulmonary venous compliance (CSV, CPV); b picture of mounted 70 cc pump chamber as single-chambered TAH
Patient specific data (age, body surface area) as well as hemodynamic values of cardiac output, pressures and pulmonary vascular resistance for the early Fontan scenario
| Authors | Experimental set point | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Yoshitake | Di Molfetta | ||
| No. of patients | 12 | 10 (30)a | Pump chamber size: 50 cc |
| BSA (m2) | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.57 ± 0.31a | |
| Age (years) | 2.5 ± 0.6 | 3.4 ± 3.7a | |
| CO (L/min) | 2.3 ± 0.9 | 2.5 ± 0.9 | – |
| CI (L/min/m2) | 4.4 ± 1.3 | – | |
| MAP (mmHg) | 63.4 ± 5.3 | 54.1 ± 18.1 | 60 |
| PAP (mmHg) | 11.8 ± 2.3 | 10.9 ± 4.2 | – |
| LAP (mmHg) | 7.3 ± 1.9 | 6.7 ± 2.9 | – |
| RAP (mmHg) | – | – | 8 |
| 1.8 ± 0.6 | – | – | |
| – | – | 3.5 | |
| TPG (mmHg) | 4.5b | 4.2b | – |
Values are represented as mean value ± standard deviation [15, 19]
BSA body surface area, CO cardiac output, CI cardiac index, MAP mean aortic pressure, PAP pulmonary artery pressure, LAP, RAP left and right atrial pressure, R, R pulmonary vascular resistance and pulmonary vascular resistance index, TPG transpulmonary pressure gradient
aAge and body surface refer to the whole patient cohort (n = 30); measurement data only to patients with Fontan procedure (n = 10)
bCalculated value
Patient specific data (age, body surface area) as well as hemodynamic values of cardiac output, pressures and pulmonary vascular resistance for the late Fontan scenario
| Authors | Experimental set point | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ohuchi | Schmitt | Mori | ||
| No. of patients | 23 | 10 | 18 | Pump chamber size: 70 cc |
| BSA (m2) | – | 1.4 ± 0.4 | 1.9 ± 0.29 | |
| Age (years) | 15.3 ± 8.0 | 22 ± 10 | 29.2 ± 7.3 | |
| CO (L/min) | – | 2.97 ± 0.76 | – | – |
| CI (L/min/m2) | 2.6 ± 0.6 | 2.2 ± 0.7 | 2.8 ± 0.9 | – |
| MAP (mmHg) | 70 ± 8 | – | 83.5 ± 14.3 | 80 |
| PAP (mmHg) | – | 11.1 ± 1.3 | – | – |
| LAP (mmHg) | – | – | 13.5 ± 5.7 | – |
| RAP (mmHg) | 11.4 ± 2.2 | – | 18.6 ± 6.5 | 15 |
| 1.8 ± 0.6 | 2.7 ± 1.0 | – | ||
| – | 3.7 ± 2.0 | – | 3.5 | |
| TPG (mmHg) | – | 5.5 ± 1.3 | 5.1 ± 3.9 | – |
Values are represented as mean value ± standard deviation [16–18]
BSA body surface area, CO cardiac output, CI cardiac index, MAP mean aortic pressure, PAP pulmonary artery pressure, LAP, RAP left and right atrial pressure, R, R pulmonary vascular resistance and pulmonary vascular resistance index, TPG transpulmonary pressure gradient
Fig. 2Cardiac output depending on transpulmonary pressure gradient (TPG); with increase of pressure gradient cardiac output decreases for all four combinations. Pulmonary hypertension is considered for TPG values of 12 mmHg or higher [21]. Patients with a TPG less than 8 mmHg had greater freedom from palliation failure [22]. This value is utilized as an upper limit of the ideal range
Fig. 3Cardiac output as function of central venous pressure (CVP) and three representing areas; (1) “Optimal” CVP lies below 10 mmHg for late survivors (> 15 year follow-up) [29]; (2) Masutani et al. measured a CVP of 5–20 mmHg on Fontan patients [30]; (3) CVP greater than 20 mmHg is considered pathologically high
Fig. 4Cardiac output as a function of left atrial pressure (LAP) for a normal pulmonary vascular resistance (RP) and a raised RP, simulating pulmonary hypertension. The graphs show the combination of the Freedom Driver (FD) and Companion C2 Driver (CD) with the 70 cc ventricle. In young Fontan patients, the LAP is 3.8 and 9.6 mmHg [15], in adult patients between 7.8 and 19.2 mmHg [18]. The higher the preload of the ventricle the higher the cardiac output, independent of the RP