Literature DB >> 33956237

Cottonseed meal with enzyme complex for finishing pigs.

Jone Rodrigues da Silva1, Rauana Vieira de Andrade2, Anderson Corassa2, Maicon Sbardella2, Heder José D'Avila Lima3, Vânia Maria Arantes4, Alessandro Borges Amorim5.   

Abstract

This work evaluated the digestibility of the experimental diets, the performance and the economic viability of pigs in the finishing phase fed with diets containing increasing levels of cottonseed meal (CM) with enzymatic complex. In the digestibility test, 35 barrows with an average weight of 54.54 ± 2.49 kg were used and for the performance and economic viability test, 30 pigs with an average weight of 55.47 ± 5.3 kg were used. In both trials, the animals were distributed in five diets: control diet (0), control diet plus the enzyme complex (0E), diet with 5% CM plus the enzyme complex (5E), diet with 10% CM plus the enzyme complex (10E), and a diet with 15% CM plus the enzyme complex (15E). The digestibility coefficients of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM) and crude protein (CP) reduced with the inclusion of CM with enzyme complex in the diet of pigs in the finishing phase, in contrast to the ether extract (EE), which improved as the inclusion of CM increased. No statistical difference (P > 0.05) was found in the performance when all diets were compared; however, when comparing only the diets that contained the enzyme complex separately, a negative linear effect (P = 0.015) was observed for the feed conversion (FC) in period 2. The diets have no effects on periods 1 and 3. Diets 0, 5E, 10E, and 15E, presented better net income (P = 0.019) in March to May 2018 due to the different levels of inclusion of CM with enzyme complex; in the other evaluated items, there were no statistical differences (P > 0.05). The inclusion of CM and enzyme complex in the diets reduced the digestibility of the dietary components; however, it did not reflect on the performance and was not financially viable in the studied scenario.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Additives; Byproduct; Gossypol; Nutrition; Pig farming

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33956237     DOI: 10.1007/s11250-021-02762-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod        ISSN: 0049-4747            Impact factor:   1.559


  5 in total

1.  Exogenous enzymes for pigs and poultry.

Authors:  M R Bedford; H Schulze
Journal:  Nutr Res Rev       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.800

2.  Building a model based on scientific consensus for Life Cycle Impact Assessment of chemicals: the search for harmony and parsimony.

Authors:  Michael Z Hauschild; Mark Huijbregts; Olivier Jolliet; Matt MacLeod; Manuele Margni; Dik van de Meent; Ralph K Rosenbaum; Thomas E McKone
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Chemical composition, energy, and amino acid digestibility in 7 cottonseed co-products fed to growing pigs.

Authors:  D L Ma; X K Ma; L Liu; S Zhang
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Effects of silymarin on gossypol toxicosis in divergent lines of chickens.

Authors:  S Blevins; P B Siegel; D J Blodgett; M Ehrich; G K Saunders; R M Lewis
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Adsorption of Gossypol from Cottonseed Oil on Oxides.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 8.128

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.