Literature DB >> 33956155

Minimized combinatorial CRISPR screens identify genetic interactions in autophagy.

Valentina Diehl1, Martin Wegner1, Paolo Grumati1, Koraljka Husnjak1, Simone Schaubeck1, Andrea Gubas1, Varun Jayeshkumar Shah1, Ibrahim H Polat2, Felix Langschied3, Cristian Prieto-Garcia1, Konstantin Müller1, Alkmini Kalousi1, Ingo Ebersberger3,4,5, Christian H Brandts2,6,7, Ivan Dikic1,6,8,9, Manuel Kaulich1,6,8.   

Abstract

Combinatorial CRISPR-Cas screens have advanced the mapping of genetic interactions, but their experimental scale limits the number of targetable gene combinations. Here, we describe 3Cs multiplexing, a rapid and scalable method to generate highly diverse and uniformly distributed combinatorial CRISPR libraries. We demonstrate that the library distribution skew is the critical determinant of its required screening coverage. By circumventing iterative cloning of PCR-amplified oligonucleotides, 3Cs multiplexing facilitates the generation of combinatorial CRISPR libraries with low distribution skews. We show that combinatorial 3Cs libraries can be screened with minimal coverages, reducing associated efforts and costs at least 10-fold. We apply a 3Cs multiplexing library targeting 12,736 autophagy gene combinations with 247,032 paired gRNAs in viability and reporter-based enrichment screens. In the viability screen, we identify, among others, the synthetic lethal WDR45B-PIK3R4 and the proliferation-enhancing ATG7-KEAP1 genetic interactions. In the reporter-based screen, we identify over 1,570 essential genetic interactions for autophagy flux, including interactions among paralogous genes, namely ATG2A-ATG2B, GABARAP-MAP1LC3B and GABARAP-GABARAPL2. However, we only observe few genetic interactions within paralogous gene families of more than two members, indicating functional compensation between them. This work establishes 3Cs multiplexing as a platform for genetic interaction screens at scale.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33956155     DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  6 in total

Review 1.  CRISPR in cancer biology and therapy.

Authors:  Alyna Katti; Bianca J Diaz; Christina M Caragine; Neville E Sanjana; Lukas E Dow
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 2.  Tutorial: design and execution of CRISPR in vivo screens.

Authors:  Christian J Braun; Andrés Carbonell Adames; Dieter Saur; Roland Rad
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 17.021

Review 3.  Common computational tools for analyzing CRISPR screens.

Authors:  Medina Colic; Traver Hart
Journal:  Emerg Top Life Sci       Date:  2021-12-21

4.  Metabolic Rewiring Is Essential for AML Cell Survival to Overcome Autophagy Inhibition by Loss of ATG3.

Authors:  Fatima Baker; Ibrahim H Polat; Khalil Abou-El-Ardat; Islam Alshamleh; Marlyn Thoelken; Daniel Hymon; Andrea Gubas; Sebastian E Koschade; Jonas B Vischedyk; Manuel Kaulich; Harald Schwalbe; Shabnam Shaid; Christian H Brandts
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Covering the Combinatorial Design Space of Multiplex CRISPR/Cas Experiments in Plants.

Authors:  Kirsten Van Huffel; Michiel Stock; Tom Ruttink; Bernard De Baets
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Generation of dual-gRNA library for combinatorial CRISPR screening of synthetic lethal gene pairs.

Authors:  Shan Tang; Xue Wu; Jinghui Liu; Qiongsi Zhang; Xinyi Wang; Shuai Shao; Birkan Gokbag; Kunjie Fan; Xiaoqi Liu; Fuhai Li; Lijun Cheng; Lang Li
Journal:  STAR Protoc       Date:  2022-08-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.