Literature DB >> 33955129

Evaluation of the Association of Polymorphisms With Palbociclib-Induced Neutropenia: Pharmacogenetic Analysis of PALOMA-2/-3.

Hiroji Iwata1, Yoshiko Umeyama2, Yuan Liu3, Zhe Zhang3, Patrick Schnell4, Yuko Mori2, Olivia Fletcher5, Jean-Claude Marshall6, Jillian G Johnson6, Linda S Wood6, Masakazu Toi7, Richard S Finn8, Nicholas C Turner5,9, Cynthia Huang Bartlett10, Massimo Cristofanilli11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The most frequently reported treatment-related adverse event in clinical trials with the cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor palbociclib is neutropenia. Allelic variants in ABCB1 and ERCC1 might be associated with early occurrence (i.e., end of week 2 treatment) of grade 3/4 neutropenia. Pharmacogenetic analyses were performed to uncover associations between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in these genes, patient baseline characteristics, and early occurrence of grade 3/4 neutropenia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: ABCB1 (rs1045642, rs1128503) and ERCC1 (rs3212986, rs11615) were analyzed in germline DNA from palbociclib-treated patients from PALOMA-2 (n = 584) and PALOMA-3 (n = 442). SNP, race, and cycle 1 day 15 (C1D15) absolute neutrophil count (ANC) data were available for 652 patients. Univariate and multivariable analyses evaluated associations between SNPs, patient baseline characteristics, and early occurrence of grade 3/4 neutropenia. Analyses were stratified by Asian (n = 122) and non-Asian (n = 530) ethnicity. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The effect of genetic variants on palbociclib pharmacokinetics was analyzed.
RESULTS: ABCB1 and ERCC1_rs11615 SNP frequencies differed between Asian and non-Asian patients. Multivariable analysis showed that low baseline ANC was a strong independent risk factor for C1D15 grade 3/4 neutropenia regardless of race (Asians: odds ratio [OR], 6.033, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.615-13.922, p < .0001; Non-Asians: OR, 6.884, 95% CI, 4.138-11.451, p < .0001). ABCB1_rs1128503 (C/C vs. T/T: OR, 0.57, 95% CI, 0.311-1.047, p = .070) and ERCC1_rs11615 (A/A vs. G/G: OR, 1.75, 95% CI, 0.901-3.397, p = .098) were potential independent risk factors for C1D15 grade 3/4 neutropenia in non-Asian patients. Palbociclib mPFS was consistent across genetic variants; exposure was not associated with ABCB1 genotype.
CONCLUSION: This is the first comprehensive assessment of pharmacogenetic data in relationship to exposure to a CDK4/6 inhibitor. Pharmacogenetic testing may inform about potentially increased likelihood of patients developing severe neutropenia (NCT01740427, NCT01942135). IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Palbociclib plus endocrine therapy improves hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer outcomes, but is commonly associated with neutropenia. Genetic variants in ABCB1 may influence palbociclib exposure, and in ERCC1 are associated with chemotherapy-induced severe neutropenia. Here, the associations of single nucleotide polymorphisms in these genes and baseline characteristics with neutropenia were assessed. Low baseline absolute neutrophil count was a strong risk factor (p < .0001) for grade 3/4 neutropenia. There was a trend indicating that ABCB1_rs1128503 and ERCC1_rs11615 were potential risk factors (p < .10) for grade 3/4 neutropenia in non-Asian patients. Pharmacogenetic testing could inform clinicians about the likelihood of severe neutropenia with palbociclib.
© 2021 The Authors. The Oncologist published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of AlphaMed Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HR+/HER2-advanced breast cancer; Neutropenia; Palbociclib; Pharmacogenetics; Polymorphisms

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33955129      PMCID: PMC8265363          DOI: 10.1002/onco.13811

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


Introduction

The cyclin‐dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor palbociclib in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) is the current standard of care for patients with previously untreated or treated hormone receptor–positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2–) advanced breast cancer (ABC) [1, 2]. The most frequently reported palbociclib treatment‐related adverse event (AE) in the PALOMA trials is neutropenia [3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]. Unlike chemotherapy, which causes apoptotic cell death, the mechanism of action underlying palbociclib‐induced neutropenia involves potent cell cycle arrest of progenitor cells at the G1 check‐point/S phase and thus is reversible [9]. Palbociclib is metabolized primarily by cytochrome P450 isozyme (CYP)3A and sulfotransferase (SULT) enzyme SULT2A1 [10]. The genetic variants of adenosine triphosphate–binding cassette subfamily B member 1 (ABCB1) (P‐glycoprotein) may be associated with palbociclib exposure, as it is generally known that the substrates and/or inhibitors of CYP3A and ABCB1 overlap with each other [11, 12]. The CYP3A7*1C allele may be associated with less drug exposure, which may lead to worse clinical outcomes, and reduced grade 3/4 neutropenia occurrence [13]. Previous reports suggest that genetic variants of ABCB1 and excision repair cross‐complementing 1 (ERCC1) are associated with increased exposure to a number of chemotherapy agents and reduced DNA repair capability of normal cells damaged by chemotherapy, respectively [11, 14, 15]. ABCB1, expressed in cell plasma membrane, plays a role in the first‐pass elimination of drugs administered orally, limiting their bioavailability [11], and ERCC1 plays a role in repairing DNA damage [16]. Previous reports have also shown a strong association between ERCC1 genotype and developing grade 4 neutropenia among Asian patients treated with anthracycline‐based chemotherapy regimens [14]. Thus, these genes are potentially linked to the increased occurrence of grade 3/4 neutropenia during treatment for breast cancer and may not be limited to cytotoxic agents. In the PALOMA‐2 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01740427) and PALOMA‐3 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01942135) clinical trials, Asian patients who received palbociclib combination therapy tended to have higher incidence rates of grade 4 neutropenia (18%–34% in Asians vs. 8% in non‐Asians) and dose reduction associated with AEs compared with non‐Asian patients [17, 18, 19]. Lower body mass index (BMI) and lower pretreatment white blood cell (WBC) count have been identified as risk factors for higher rates of grade 4 neutropenia in patients treated with anthracycline‐based chemotherapy [14] and therefore may be linked to high‐grade neutropenia in response to palbociclib treatment as well. Germline polymorphisms are attractive candidates that may potentially explain these differences and can be easily assessed in available samples. Because neutropenia is a mechanism‐based, treatment‐related AE, we hypothesized that the presence of any pharmacogenetic differences between subgroups of patients would manifest in the rapid (within 2 weeks) appearance of high‐grade neutropenia compared with the overall population, in which the median time of first onset of grade 3 or higher neutropenia is 4 weeks [20]. In addition, the median time of first onset of grade 3 or higher neutropenia was 15.0 to 15.5 days in Japanese patients treated with palbociclib plus letrozole or fulvestrant [21]. Therefore, pharmacogenetic analyses of these variants in patients from the phase III PALOMA‐2 and PALOMA‐3 clinical trials were performed to evaluate potential associations between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and early occurrence (defined as day 15 ± 1 day of treatment) of grade 3/4 neutropenia. The association between patient baseline characteristics and early occurrence of grade 3/4 neutropenia was also investigated. In addition, the association between SNP variants and clinical outcome (progression‐free survival [PFS]) in patients receiving palbociclib or placebo in combination with ET from PALOMA‐2 and PALOMA‐3 was explored.

Materials and Methods

Study Design

The study designs of both PALOMA‐2 and PALOMA‐3 have been previously described in detail [4, 5]. In PALOMA‐2, 666 patients were randomized 2:1 to receive either palbociclib (125 mg/day, oral, 3/1 schedule) plus letrozole (2.5 mg/day, oral, continuous) or matching placebo plus letrozole [4]. In PALOMA‐3, 521 patients were randomized 2:1 to receive either palbociclib (125 mg/day, oral, 3/1 schedule) plus fulvestrant (500 mg, intramuscular injection, on days 1 and 15 of cycle 1, and then day 1 of every cycle thereafter) or matching placebo plus fulvestrant [5]. Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was collected from laboratory data for hematology (not from reported AEs) on days 1 and 15 for the first two cycles, on day 1 of subsequent cycles, and at end of treatment or study withdrawal. Neutropenia based on ANC was graded by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.4.0 and counted once by maximum grade. Both studies were approved by an institutional review board, or equivalent, at each site, and all patients gave written informed consent before enrollment. Both studies were conducted according to the principles of Good Clinical Practice and the Declaration of Helsinki [4, 5].

Genomic Analyses

Genomic DNA was extracted from blood samples (n = 1,026) of patients in PALOMA‐2 (n = 584) and PALOMA‐3 (n = 442) using a QIAsymphony (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) automated platform running a DSP DNA Mini Kit. DNA was quantified by NanoDrop (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA). DNA was genotyped using commercially available TaqMan assays (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) for two variants for ABCB1, rs1045642 (C___7586657_20) and rs1128503 (C_7586662_10); 2 variants for ERCC1, rs3212986 (C___2532948_10) and rs11615 (C___2532959_20); and one variant that tags the CYP3A7*1C allele (rs45446698; C_30634320_10). Analyses were performed utilizing a QuantStudio (ThermoFisher) 12K Flex Real‐Time PCR system.

Pharmacokinetics

Data from the palbociclib pharmacokinetics (PK) analysis sets from PALOMA‐2 (i.e., patients under fed conditions [after eating a meal] at the time of PK sampling; n = 180) and PALOMA‐3 (n = 218) were pooled to investigate the association between palbociclib exposure and ABCB1 genotypes. Of the 398 patients, 344 had available genotype data. Individual plasma palbociclib concentration was calculated as within‐patient mean steady‐state trough concentrations across cycles 1 and 2 (i.e., the arithmetic mean of predose concentration of day 14 [PALOMA‐2] or day 15 [PALOMA‐3] of cycles 1 and 2). Distribution of plasma palbociclib concentration across ABCB1 genotypes and race was evaluated.

Statistical Analysis

Associations of SNP variants and patient baseline characteristics with early occurrence of grade 3/4 neutropenia at cycle 1 day 15 (C1D15) of palbociclib treatment were assessed in a pooled analysis from PALOMA‐2 and PALOMA‐3 studies. Patient baseline characteristics such as age, body weight, BMI, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, prior radiotherapy or chemotherapy, ANC, WBC, and platelet counts were included. Cutoff values for laboratory data were based on the medians. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors for C1D15 grade 3/4 neutropenia. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Risk factors of C1D15 grade 3/4 neutropenia with p values < .10 by univariate analysis were considered in the multivariable analysis. This variable selection criterion was applied to the overall population only. Collinearity among potential risk factors was further examined so that highly correlated covariates were not simultaneously included in the multivariable models. Analyses stratified by Asian (n = 122) and non‐Asian (n = 530) ethnicity were also conducted, considering that allelic variation is race specific (Asian or non‐Asian) and that the multivariable analysis in the overall population is potentially confounded by race. Limited by small sample sizes, especially for Asian patients, variables included in the multivariable model for Asian and non‐Asian patients were driven by biological and/or clinical relevance. SNPs were tested for Hardy‐Weinberg equilibrium in the Asian and non‐Asian populations using a permutation‐based exact test. The median PFS (mPFS) and associated 95% CIs of patients with each variant were estimated separately in PALOMA‐2 and PALOMA‐3 using the Kaplan‐Meier method. The p values were calculated using the 2‐sided log‐rank test and not adjusted for multiplicity. Hazard ratios and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. All statistical tests were 2‐sided, with p values < .05 considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS v.9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

Results

In total, 652 patients receiving palbociclib in PALOMA‐2 and PALOMA‐3 had available SNP, race, and C1D15 ANC data. Of these 652 patients, 122 were Asian and 530 were non‐Asian; the category “non‐Asian” comprised predominantly self‐reported white patients (94%). C1D15 grade 3/4 neutropenia was reported in 67 Asian patients (54.9%) and 123 non‐Asian patients (23.2%). Alleles for the four SNPs (ABCB1_rs1128503, ABCB1_rs1045642, ERCC1_rs11615, ERCC1_rs3212986) were in Hardy‐Weinberg equilibrium in both Asian patients (p > .999, p > .999, p = .6638, and p = .8205, respectively) and non‐Asian patients (p = .4329, p = .3870, p = .7903, and p = .5723, respectively). Allele frequencies for ABCB1_rs1128503, ABCB1_rs1045642, and ERCC1_rs11615 differed between Asians and non‐Asian patients, whereas allele frequencies for ERCC1_rs3212986 were relatively similar between non‐Asian and Asian patients (Fig. 1). The CYP3A7*1C allele was found only in non‐Asian patients, consistent with the dbSNP database. Because of the low frequency, it was not possible to assess the impact of this polymorphism on clinical outcomes.
Figure 1

Allele frequencies by population. Abbreviations: ABCB1, adenosine triphosphate–binding cassette subfamily B member 1; ERCC1, excision repair cross‐complementing 1.

Allele frequencies by population. Abbreviations: ABCB1, adenosine triphosphate–binding cassette subfamily B member 1; ERCC1, excision repair cross‐complementing 1. To investigate the associations between early occurrence of neutropenia and ABCB1 and ERCC1 genotypes, and between early occurrence of neutropenia and patient baseline characteristics in the palbociclib arms of the overall populations of PALOMA‐2 and PALOMA‐3, univariate analyses were initially performed (Table 1). For ABCB1_rs1128503, the frequency of early occurrence of grade 3/4 neutropenia was higher for patients with the T/T allele than for those with C/T or C/C (38.2% vs. 28.5% or 23.1%; OR, 0.647 and 0.486; p = .038 and .003, respectively). For ERCC1_rs11615, the frequency of early occurrence of grade 3/4 neutropenia was higher in patients with G/G than in those with A/G (36.1% vs. 26.6%; OR, 0.641; p = .039). In the univariate analysis (Table 1), early occurrence of grade 3/4 neutropenia was more likely to develop in Asian versus non‐Asian patients (OR, 0.248; p < .0001), patients aged <50 years versus 50 to 69 or ≥70 years (OR, 0.616 and 0.518; p = .024 and .017, respectively), patients with weight <55 versus ≥65 kg (OR, 0.463; p = .0009), patients with BMI <18.5 versus ≥30 kg/m2 (OR, 0.358; p = .029), and patients with low baseline ANC (i.e., counts less than the median value vs. greater than or equal to the median value; OR, 7.628; p < .0001), WBC count (OR, 6.183; p < .0001), or platelet count (OR, 2.073; p < .0001).
Table 1

Association between genotypes, patient baseline characteristics, and neutropenia in the overall population (palbociclib arm) in PALOMA‐2 and PALOMA‐3

Genotypes and patient baseline characteristics n (%)C1D15 neutropenia, n (%)Odds ratio (95% CI) p value
Grade 0–2Grade 3–4
Univariate analysis
Genotypes
ABCB1_rs1128503652
T/T152 (23.3)94 (61.8)58 (38.2)
C/T305 (46.8)218 (71.5)87 (28.5)0.647 (0.429–0.975).038
C/C195 (29.9)150 (76.9)45 (23.1)0.486 (0.305–0.776).003
ABCB1_rs1045642652
C/C166 (25.5)115 (69.3)51 (30.7)
T/C333 (51.1)238 (71.5)95 (28.5)0.900 (0.599–1.352).612
T/T153 (23.5)109 (71.2)44 (28.8)0.910 (0.563–1.472).702
ERCC1_rs11615652
G/G147 (22.5)94 (63.9)53 (36.1)
A/G305 (46.8)224 (73.4)81 (26.6)0.641 (0.421–0.978).039
A/A200 (30.7)144 (72.0)56 (28.0)0.690 (0.437–1.089).111
ERCC1_rs3212986652
C/C355 (54.4)253 (71.3)102 (28.7)
A/C250 (38.3)175 (70.0)75 (30.0)1.063 (0.745–1.516).736
A/A47 (7.2)34 (72.3)13 (27.7)0.948 (0.481–1.871).879
Patient baseline characteristics
Race652
Asian122 (18.7)55 (45.1)67 (54.9)
Non‐Asian530 (81.3)407 (76.8)123 (23.2)0.248 (0.165–0.374)<.0001
Age, yr652
<50125 (19.2)77 (61.6)48 (38.4)
50–69400 (61.3)289 (72.3)111 (27.8)0.616 (0.404–0.939).024
≥70127 (19.5)96 (75.6)31 (24.4)0.518 (0.301–0.891).017
Weight, kg652
<55106 (16.3)63 (59.4)43 (40.6)
55–<65167 (25.6)111 (66.5)56 (33.5)0.739 (0.447–1.223).239
≥65379 (58.1)288 (76.0)91 (24.0)0.463 (0.294–0.729).0009
BMI, kg/m2 651
<18.521 (3.2)11 (52.4)10 (47.6)
18.5–<30455 (69.9)318 (69.9)137 (30.1)0.474 (0.197–1.142).096
≥30175 (26.9)132 (75.4)43 (24.6)0.358 (0.142–0.902).029
ECOG PS652
0373 (57.2)256 (68.6)117 (31.4)
1 or 2279 (42.8)206 (73.8)73 (26.2)0.775 (0.549–1.095).149
Received prior chemotherapy652
No265 (40.6)191 (72.1)74 (27.9)
Yes387 (59.4)271 (70.0)116 (30.0)1.105 (0.782–1.561).572
Received prior radiotherapy650
No256 (39.4)180 (70.3)76 (29.7)
Yes394 (60.6)280 (71.1)114 (28.9)0.964 (0.683–1.362).836
Baseline ANC (×103/mm3)652
≥ Median value a 332 (50.9)296 (89.2)36 (10.8)
< Median value a 320 (49.1)166 (51.9)154 (48.1)7.628 (5.064–11.489)<.0001
Baseline WBC count (×103/mm3)652
≥ Median value b 332 (50.9)291 (87.7)41 (12.3)
< Median value b 320 (49.1)171 (53.4)149 (46.6)6.183 (4.170–9.168)<.0001
Baseline PLT count (×103/mm3)652
≥ Median value c 330 (50.6)258 (78.2)72 (21.8)
< Median value c 322 (49.4)204 (63.4)118 (36.6)2.073 (1.467–2.929)<.0001
Multivariable analysis
Risk factor
ABCB1_rs1128503
C/T vs. T/T0.765 (0.484–1.207).249
C/C vs. T/T0.560 (0.334–0.937).027
ERCC1_rs11615
A/G vs. G/G0.726 (0.454–1.163).183
A/A vs. G/G0.838 (0.504–1.395).497
Age, yr
50–69 vs. <500.804 (0.504–1.284).361
≥70 vs. <500.725 (0.398–1.322).295
BMI, kg/m2
18.5–<30 vs. <18.50.586 (0.218–1.575).289
≥30 vs. <18.50.451 (0.159–1.274).133
Baseline ANC (×103/mm3)
< Median vs. ≥ median value a 7.251 (4.788–10.982)<.0001

Baseline ANC median value was 3.60 (×103/mm3).

Baseline WBC median value was 5.80 (×103/mm3).

Baseline PLT median value was 241.0 (×103/mm3).

Abbreviations: ABCB1, adenosine triphosphate–binding cassette subfamily B member 1; ANC, absolute neutrophil count; BMI, body mass index; C1D15, cycle 1 day 15; CI, confidence interval; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; ERCC1, excision repair cross‐complementing 1; PLT, platelet; WBC, white blood cell.

Association between genotypes, patient baseline characteristics, and neutropenia in the overall population (palbociclib arm) in PALOMA‐2 and PALOMA‐3 Baseline ANC median value was 3.60 (×103/mm3). Baseline WBC median value was 5.80 (×103/mm3). Baseline PLT median value was 241.0 (×103/mm3). Abbreviations: ABCB1, adenosine triphosphate–binding cassette subfamily B member 1; ANC, absolute neutrophil count; BMI, body mass index; C1D15, cycle 1 day 15; CI, confidence interval; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; ERCC1, excision repair cross‐complementing 1; PLT, platelet; WBC, white blood cell. After identifying individual genotypes and baseline characteristics that may influence the likelihood of developing early occurrence of neutropenia, multivariable analyses were performed adjusting for the covariates to uncover potential independent associations among clinical variables and early occurrence of neutropenia in the palbociclib arms of the overall populations of PALOMA‐2 and PALOMA‐3 (Table 1). High multicollinearity existed among the significant risk factors identified in the univariate analysis. For example, race was highly correlated with ABCB1_rs1128503 (p < .0001), ERCC1_rs11615 (p < .0001), baseline BMI (p < .0001), baseline ANC (p < .0001), baseline WBC count (p = .0006), and baseline platelet count (p = .006). Thus, race and the other collinear variables could not be simultaneously included in the multivariable logistic regression model. Ultimately, the variables included in the multivariable model were ABCB1_rs1128503, ERCC1_rs11615, age, baseline BMI, and baseline ANC. No significant correlation was observed between ABCB1_rs1128503 and ERCC1_rs11615. Risk factors for ABCB1_rs1128503 (C/C vs. T/T: OR, 0.560; 95% CI, 0.334–0.937; p = .027) and baseline ANC (low vs. high by median: OR, 7.251; 95% CI, 4.788–10.982; p < .0001) remained statistically significant in the multivariable analysis. The observed association of ABCB1_rs1128503 is likely attributable to populations of different genetic ancestry. The multivariable analysis in the overall population was potentially confounded by race because of the high multicollinearity of Asian ethnicity with the risk factors in the multivariable risk model. Therefore, analyses stratified by Asian (n = 122) and non‐Asian (n = 530) ethnicity were performed next. Univariate analyses were performed to investigate the association between genotypes, patient baseline characteristics, and early occurrence of neutropenia in Asian patients in the palbociclib arms of PALOMA‐2 and ‐3 (Table 2). For ABCB1_rs1128503, among the 67 Asian patients with grade 3/4 neutropenia, 26 were T/T, 31 were C/T, and 10 were C/C. The frequency of early occurrence of grade 3/4 neutropenia was not significantly different with any genotype in Asian patients. Early occurrence of grade 3/4 neutropenia was more likely in Asian patients with low compared with high baseline ANC or WBC count (OR, 4.986; p < .0001 and OR, 2.759; p = .007, respectively). Based on these findings from the univariate analysis, a multivariable analysis was performed to investigate the independent association among the clinical variables and early occurrence of neutropenia in Asian patients in the palbociclib arms of PALOMA‐2 and PALOMA‐3 (Table 2). Because multicollinearity issues among the risk factors, the variables included in the model were ABCB1_rs1128503, ERCC1_rs11615, and baseline ANC. Baseline WBC count was highly correlated with ANC and thus not copresented in the model. No significant correlation was observed between ABCB1_rs1128503 and ERCC1_rs11615. Baseline ANC was the only variable with a statistically significant association with early occurrence of grade 3/4 neutropenia (low vs. high by median: OR, 6.033; 95% CI, 2.615–13.922; p < .0001).
Table 2

Association between genotypes, patient baseline characteristics, and neutropenia in the Asian population (palbociclib arm) in PALOMA‐2 and PALOMA‐3

Genotypes and patient baseline characteristics n (%)C1D15 neutropenia, n (%)Odds ratio (95% CI) p value
Grade 0–2Grade 3–4
Univariate analysis
Genotypes
ABCB1_rs1128503122
T/T52 (42.6)26 (50.0)26 (50.0)
C/T55 (45.1)24 (43.6)31 (56.4)1.292 (0.603–2.765).510
C/C15 (12.3)5 (33.3)10 (66.7)2.000 (0.600–6.662).259
ABCB1_rs1045642122
C/C47 (38.5)18 (38.3)29 (61.7)
T/C57 (46.7)29 (50.9)28 (49.1)0.599 (0.273–1.313).201
T/T18 (14.8)8 (44.4)10 (55.6)0.776 (0.258–2.331).651
ERCC1_rs11615122
G/G60 (49.2)24 (40.0)36 (60.0)
A/G53 (43.4)25 (47.2)28 (52.8)0.747 (0.354–1.576).443
A/A9 (7.4)6 (66.7)3 (33.3)0.333 (0.076–1.463).145
ERCC1_rs3212986122
C/C64 (52.5)33 (51.6)31 (48.4)
A/C50 (41.0)20 (40.0)30 (60.0)1.597 (0.755–3.376).221
A/A8 (6.6)2 (25.0)6 (75.0)3.194 (0.599–17.028).174
Patient baseline characteristics
Age, yr122
<5028 (23.0)12 (42.9)16 (57.1)
50–6978 (63.9)37 (47.4)41 (52.6)0.831 (0.348–1.985).677
≥7016 (13.1)6 (37.5)10 (62.5)1.250 (0.355–4.402).728
Weight, kg122
<5553 (43.4)23 (43.4)30 (56.6)
55–<6543 (35.2)16 (37.2)27 (62.8)1.294 (0.568–2.946).540
≥6526 (21.3)16 (61.5)10 (38.5)0.479 (0.184–1.250).133
BMI, kg/m2 122
<18.512 (9.8)4 (33.3)8 (66.7)
18.5–<30101 (82.8)48 (47.5)53 (52.5)0.552 (0.156–1.951).356
≥309 (7.4)3 (33.3)6 (66.7)1.000 (0.160–6.255)1.000
ECOG PS122
080 (65.6)34 (42.5)46 (57.5)
1 or 242 (34.4)21 (50.0)21 (50.0)0.739 (0.349–1.565).430
Received prior chemotherapy122
No49 (40.2)25 (51.0)24 (49.0)
Yes73 (59.8)30 (41.1)43 (58.9)1.493 (0.720–3.094).281
Received prior radiotherapy122
No50 (41.0)22 (44.0)28 (56.0)
Yes72 (59.0)33 (45.8)39 (54.2)0.929 (0.449–1.919).842
Baseline ANC (×103/mm3)122
≥ Median value a 61 (50.0)39 (63.9)22 (36.1)
< Median value a 61 (50.0)16 (26.2)45 (73.8)4.986 (2.300–10.808)<.0001
Baseline WBC count (×103/mm3)122
≥ Median value b 61 (50.0)35 (57.4)26 (42.6)
< Median value b 61 (50.0)20 (32.8)41 (67.2)2.759 (1.320–5.766).007
Baseline PLT count (×103/mm3)122
≥ Median value c 63 (51.6)30 (47.6)33 (52.4)
< Median value c 59 (48.4)25 (42.4)34 (57.6)1.236 (0.605–2.527).561
Multivariable analysis
Risk factor
ABCB1_rs1128503
C/T vs. T/T1.575 (0.670–3.701).297
C/C vs. T/T2.417 (0.650–8.987).188
ERCC1_rs11615
A/G vs. G/G0.509 (0.217–1.196).122
A/A vs. G/G0.339 (0.062–1.857).212
Baseline ANC (×103/mm3)
< Median vs. ≥ median value a 6.033 (2.615–13.922)<.0001

Baseline ANC median value was 3.094 (×103/mm3).

Baseline WBC median value was 5.22 (×103/mm3).

Baseline PLT median value was 225.0 (×103/mm3).

Abbreviations: ABCB1, adenosine triphosphate–binding cassette subfamily B member 1; ANC, absolute neutrophil count; BMI, body mass index; C1D15, cycle 1 day 15; CI, confidence interval; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; ERCC1, excision repair cross‐complementing 1; PLT, platelet; WBC, white blood cell.

Association between genotypes, patient baseline characteristics, and neutropenia in the Asian population (palbociclib arm) in PALOMA‐2 and PALOMA‐3 Baseline ANC median value was 3.094 (×103/mm3). Baseline WBC median value was 5.22 (×103/mm3). Baseline PLT median value was 225.0 (×103/mm3). Abbreviations: ABCB1, adenosine triphosphate–binding cassette subfamily B member 1; ANC, absolute neutrophil count; BMI, body mass index; C1D15, cycle 1 day 15; CI, confidence interval; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; ERCC1, excision repair cross‐complementing 1; PLT, platelet; WBC, white blood cell. The association between ABCB1 and ERCC1 genotypes and early occurrence of neutropenia, as well as patient baseline characteristics and early occurrence of neutropenia, in non‐Asian patients in the palbociclib arms of PALOMA‐2 and ‐3 using univariate analysis was investigated (Table 3). For ABCB1_rs1128503, of the 123 non‐Asian patients with early occurrence of grade 3/4 neutropenia, 32 were T/T, 56 were C/T, and 35 were the C/C genotype. The frequency of early occurrence of grade 3/4 neutropenia was higher in patients with T/T than in those with C/C (32.0% vs. 19.4%; OR, 0.513; p = .019). Early occurrence of grade 3/4 neutropenia was more likely for patients aged < 50 years versus those aged 50 to 69 or ≥ 70 years (OR, 0.564 and 0.474; p = .025 and .021, respectively) and in patients with low baseline ANC, WBC count, or platelet count by median (OR, 7.161, 7.143, and 2.155; p < .0001, < .0001, and = .0003, respectively). Multivariable analyses were used to determine the independent associations among the clinical variables identified from the univariate analysis and early occurrence of neutropenia in non‐Asian palbociclib‐treated patients (Table 3). Because of multicollinearity among the risk factors, the variables included in the model were ABCB1_rs1128503, ERCC1_rs11615, age, and baseline ANC. No significant correlation between ABCB1_rs1128503 and ERCC1_rs11615 was observed. Baseline ANC remained significant (low vs. high by median: OR, 6.884; 95% CI, 4.138–11.451; p < .0001). ABCB1_rs1128503 (C/C vs. T/T: OR, 0.570; 95% CI, 0.311–1.047; p = .070) and ERCC1_rs11615 (A/A vs. G/G: OR, 1.750; 95% CI, 0.901–3.397; p = .098) were potential independent risk factors for C1D15 grade 3/4 neutropenia in non‐Asians, albeit not statistically significant.
Table 3

Association between genotypes, patient baseline characteristics, and neutropenia in the non‐Asian population (palbociclib arm) in PALOMA‐2 and PALOMA‐3

Genotypes and patient baseline characteristics n (%)C1D15 neutropenia, n (%)Odds ratio (95% CI) p value
Grade 0–2Grade 3–4
Univariate Analysis
Genotypes
ABCB1_rs1128503530
T/T100 (18.9)68 (68.0)32 (32.0)
C/T250 (47.2)194 (77.6)56 (22.4)0.613 (0.367–1.026).063
C/C180 (34.0)145 (80.6)35 (19.4)0.513 (0.293–0.897).019
ABCB1_rs1045642530
C/C119 (22.5)97 (81.5)22 (18.5)
T/C276 (52.1)209 (75.7)67 (24.3)1.413 (0.825–2.421).208
T/T135 (25.5)101 (74.8)34 (25.2)1.484 (0.811–2.716).200
ERCC1_rs11615530
G/G87 (16.4)70 (80.5)17 (19.5)
A/G252 (47.5)199 (79.0)53 (21.0)1.097 (0.596–2.019).767
A/A191 (36.0)138 (72.3)53 (27.7)1.581 (0.853–2.932).146
ERCC1_rs3212986530
C/C291 (54.9)220 (75.6)71 (24.4)
A/C200 (37.7)155 (77.5)45 (22.5)0.900 (0.587–1.378).627
A/A39 (7.4)32 (82.1)7 (17.9)0.678 (0.287–1.603).376
Patient baseline characteristics
Age, yr530
<5097 (18.3)65 (67.0)32 (33.0)
50–69322 (60.8)252 (78.3)70 (21.7)0.564 (0.342–0.930).025
≥70111 (20.9)90 (81.1)21 (18.9)0.474 (0.251–0.895).021
Weight, kg530
<5553 (10.0)40 (75.5)13 (24.5)
55–<65124 (23.4)95 (76.6)29 (23.4)0.939 (0.443–1.991).870
≥65353 (66.6)272 (77.1)81 (22.9)0.916 (0.467–1.796).799
BMI, kg/m2 529
<18.59 (1.7)7 (77.8)2 (22.2)
18.5–<30354 (66.9)270 (76.3)84 (23.7)1.089 (0.222–5.342).916
≥30166 (31.4)129 (77.7)37 (22.3)1.004 (0.200–5.039).996
ECOG PS530
0293 (55.3)222 (75.8)71 (24.2)
1 or 2237 (44.7)185 (78.1)52 (21.9)0.879 (0.585–1.321).535
Received prior chemotherapy530
No216 (40.8)166 (76.9)50 (23.1)
Yes314 (59.2)241 (76.8)73 (23.2)1.006 (0.667–1.516).979
Received prior radiotherapy528
No206 (39.0)158 (76.7)48 (23.3)
Yes322 (61.0)247 (76.7)75 (23.3)0.999 (0.661–1.512).998
Baseline ANC (×103/mm3)530
≥ Median value a 270 (50.9)248 (91.9)22 (8.1)
< Median value a 260 (49.1)159 (61.2)101 (38.8)7.161 (4.333–11.833)<.0001
Baseline WBC count (×103/mm3)530
≥ Median value b 276 (52.1)253 (91.7)23 (8.3)
< Median value b 254 (47.9)154 (60.6)100 (39.4)7.143 (4.352–11.724)<.0001
Baseline PLT count (×103/mm3)530
≥ Median value c 266 (50.2)222 (83.5)44 (16.5)
< Median value c 264 (49.8)185 (70.1)79 (29.9)2.155 (1.420–3.270).0003
Multivariable analysis
Risk factor
ABCB1_rs1128503
C/T vs. T/T0.734 (0.420–1.283).278
C/C vs. T/T0.570 (0.311–1.047).070
ERCC1_rs11615
A/G vs. G/G1.165 (0.605–2.243).647
A/A vs. G/G1.750 (0.901–3.397).098
Age, yr
50–69 vs. <500.696 (0.405–1.195).189
≥70 vs. <500.615 (0.310–1.219).164
Baseline ANC (×103/mm3)
< Median vs. ≥ median value a 6.884 (4.138–11.451)<.0001

Baseline ANC median value was 3.70 (×103/mm3).

Baseline WBC median value was 5.90 (×103/mm3).

Baseline PLT median value was 244.0 (×103/mm3).

Abbreviations: ABCB1, adenosine triphosphate–binding cassette subfamily B member 1; ANC, absolute neutrophil count; BMI, body mass index; C1D15, cycle 1 day 15; CI, confidence interval; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; ERCC1, excision repair cross‐complementing 1; PLT, platelet; WBC, white blood cell.

Association between genotypes, patient baseline characteristics, and neutropenia in the non‐Asian population (palbociclib arm) in PALOMA‐2 and PALOMA‐3 Baseline ANC median value was 3.70 (×103/mm3). Baseline WBC median value was 5.90 (×103/mm3). Baseline PLT median value was 244.0 (×103/mm3). Abbreviations: ABCB1, adenosine triphosphate–binding cassette subfamily B member 1; ANC, absolute neutrophil count; BMI, body mass index; C1D15, cycle 1 day 15; CI, confidence interval; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; ERCC1, excision repair cross‐complementing 1; PLT, platelet; WBC, white blood cell. Because genetic variants in ABCB1 may be associated with palbociclib exposure, the association between palbociclib exposure and ABCB1 genotypes was assessed in the palbociclib arms of the overall populations of PALOMA‐2 and ‐3. No associations between ABCB1 genotypes and palbociclib exposure were observed (Fig. 2A). Geometric mean plasma palbociclib concentrations were 70.7, 72.5, and 70.3 ng/mL, respectively, in patients with the C/C, C/T, and T/T variants of ABCB1_rs1128503, and 76.8, 69.6, and 69.6 ng/mL in patients with the C/C, T/C, and T/T variants of ABCB1_rs1045642. Exposure was higher in Asian compared with non‐Asian patients, with geometric mean plasma palbociclib concentrations of 89.6 and 68.6 ng/mL, respectively (Fig. 2B); however, individual values in Asian patients were within the ranges reported in non‐Asian patients.
Figure 2

Association between ABCB1 genotype, race, and palbociclib exposure. Plasma palbociclib concentration for (A) ABCB1 genotypes and (B) Asian and non‐Asian patients. Box plots depict the median (horizontal bar) and 25% and 75% quartiles, including values within the 1.5 times interquartile range. Diamonds represent the geometric mean, and green dots represent individual within‐patient mean concentration values. Abbreviation: ABCB1, adenosine triphosphate–binding cassette subfamily B member 1.

Association between ABCB1 genotype, race, and palbociclib exposure. Plasma palbociclib concentration for (A) ABCB1 genotypes and (B) Asian and non‐Asian patients. Box plots depict the median (horizontal bar) and 25% and 75% quartiles, including values within the 1.5 times interquartile range. Diamonds represent the geometric mean, and green dots represent individual within‐patient mean concentration values. Abbreviation: ABCB1, adenosine triphosphate–binding cassette subfamily B member 1. The influence of genotype on the clinical efficacy of palbociclib was assessed. Patients showed a consistent treatment effect, as measured by mPFS of the two treatment arms as well as hazard ratios, across the gene variants. The mPFS was significantly prolonged with palbociclib plus ET versus placebo plus ET for all genetic variants in both PALOMA‐2 and ‐3, except for ABCB1_rs1045642 T/T and ERCC1_rs3212986 A/A, although this was not statistically significant because of the limited numbers of events (Table 4).
Table 4

Progression‐free survival by genetic variants in PALOMA‐2 and PALOMA‐3

GenotypesPALOMA‐2PALOMA‐3
PAL + LETPBO + LET p valuePAL + FULPBO + FUL p value
ABCB1_rs1128503
C/C, n 112439045
mPFS (95% CI), mo28.1 (21.4–37.2)14.5 (10.9–23.3).00313.4 (9.4–16.6)4.8 (1.9–5.6)<.0001
Hazard ratio (95% CI)0.53 (0.34–0.82)0.42 (0.27–0.65)
C/T, n 18010213774
mPFS (95% CI), mo27.4 (20.2–30.6)16.8 (13.6–22.2).00811.1 (9.2–12.7)7.2 (3.4–9.2).004
Hazard ratio (95% CI)0.66 (0.49–0.90)0.61 (0.43–0.86)
T/T, n 95526332
mPFS (95% CI), mo23.9 (13.9–27.9)13.9 (5.4–19.3).00516.7 (9.9–NE)4.6 (2.1–9.2).0009
Hazard ratio (95% CI)0.57 (0.38–0.85)0.40 (0.23–0.70)
ABCB1_rs1045642
C/C, n 97367442
mPFS (95% CI), mo28.1 (22.4–NE)12.9 (7.4–18.2)<.000111.3 (7.5–16.6)5.4 (3.4–7.3).002
Hazard ratio (95% CI)0.39 (0.24–0.62)0.49 (0.31–0.78)
T/C, n 18410416274
mPFS (95% CI), mo27.6 (20.2–33.1)17.1 (13.7–24.8).000512.1 (10.9–13.7)3.7 (2.8–7.4)<.0001
Hazard ratio (95% CI)0.59 (0.44–0.80)0.43 (0.31–0.60)
T/T, n 106575435
mPFS (95% CI), mo21.9 (12.9–27.6)15.9 (8.3–22.2).30211.2 (7.5–18.0)7.2 (2.1–10.9).155
Hazard ratio (95% CI)0.81 (0.55–1.22)0.67 (0.38–1.17)
ERCC1_rs11615
A/A, n 123728648
mPFS (95% CI), mo24.2 (19.2–30.6)16.8 (12.3–38.9).00411.1 (9.4–NE)5.5 (2.8–10.9).006
Hazard ratio (95% CI)0.60 (0.42–0.86)0.54 (0.34–0.85)
A/G, n 1818513470
mPFS (95% CI), mo27.6 (19.4–30.7)13.8 (11.0–21.9).00212.1 (11.0–13.9)3.8 (2.1–5.6)<.0001
Hazard ratio (95% CI)0.60 (0.43–0.83)0.44 (0.31–0.63)
G/G, n 83407033
mPFS (95% CI), mo27.4 (19.2–35.9)15.2 (7.4–24.8).01511.3 (9.2–16.1)5.7 (3.4–8.5).012
Hazard ratio (95% CI)0.57 (0.36–0.91)0.54 (0.34–0.85)
ERCC1_rs3212986
A/A, n 3092010
mPFS (95% CI), mo27.4 (13.6–NE)16.6 (1.6–38.9).5895.6 (1.8–11.3)6.3 (1.8–13.8).921
Hazard ratio (95% CI)0.77 (0.31–2.17)0.95 (0.42–2.37)
A/C, n 1476611161
mPFS (95% CI), mo27.6 (19.3–35.9)14.5 (10.3–22.2).00513.4 (11.1–15.5)3.7 (2.1–5.6)<.0001
Hazard ratio (95% CI)0.60 (0.42–0.87)0.45 (0.31–0.67)
C/C, n 21012215980
mPFS (95% CI), mo25.1 (19.6–29.3)16.4 (12.9–21.9)<.000112.7 (9.9–NE)5.6 (3.6–9.2)<.0001
Hazard ratio (95% CI)0.58 (0.44–0.77)0.47 (0.34–0.66)

Abbreviations: ABCB1, adenosine triphosphate–binding cassette subfamily B member 1; CI, confidence interval; ERCC1, excision repair cross‐complementing 1; FUL, fulvestrant; LET, letrozole; mPFS, median progression‐free survival; NE, not estimable; PAL, palbociclib; PBO, placebo.

Progression‐free survival by genetic variants in PALOMA‐2 and PALOMA‐3 Abbreviations: ABCB1, adenosine triphosphate–binding cassette subfamily B member 1; CI, confidence interval; ERCC1, excision repair cross‐complementing 1; FUL, fulvestrant; LET, letrozole; mPFS, median progression‐free survival; NE, not estimable; PAL, palbociclib; PBO, placebo.

Discussion

This is the first comprehensive assessment of pharmacogenetic data in relationship to a CDK4/6 inhibitor. This analysis suggested that allele and genotype frequencies were in Hardy‐Weinberg equilibrium for the studied population. ABCB1 and ERCC1_rs11615 SNP allele frequencies differed between Asian and non‐Asian patients. The ABCB1_rs1128503 T/T and ERCC1_rs11615 G/G SNP allele frequencies were higher in Asian than non‐Asian patients, whereas the ABCB1_rs1128503 C/C and ERCC1_rs11615 A/A SNP allele frequencies were lower in Asian than non‐Asian patients; although the magnitude of difference was smaller, the allele frequencies for ABCB1_rs1045642 C/C and T/T also differed between Asian and non‐Asian patients. The early occurrence of grade 3/4 neutropenia was significantly higher in patients with ABCB1_rs1128503 T/T versus C/C and numerically higher in patients with ERCC1_rs11615 G/G versus A/A, whereas the frequency of early occurrence of grade 3/4 neutropenia was similar regardless of ABCB1_rs1045642 and ERCC1_rs3212986 genotype in the overall population (Table 1). It was hypothesized that the differences in ABCB1_rs1128503 and ERCC1_rs11615 SNP allele frequencies in Asian and non‐Asian patients might explain the higher frequency of neutropenia in Asian patients. Based on these findings, the associations between genotypes, patient baseline characteristics, and risk of early occurrence of neutropenia were further evaluated. In the overall population, ABCB1_rs1128503 and baseline ANC were independent risk factors for early occurrence of grade 3/4 neutropenia; however, the results are probably confounded by race. Thus, analyses stratified by Asian and non‐Asian ethnicity were also conducted. In both Asian and non‐Asian patients, low baseline ANC was a strong independent risk factor for early occurrence of grade 3/4 neutropenia. These findings support those of previous reports, which also found low baseline ANC to be a predictor of increased neutropenia with palbociclib treatment in both Asian and non‐Asian patients [17, 18, 19, 20]. ABCB1_rs1128503 and ERCC1_rs11615 were also identified as potential independent risk factors (p < .10) for grade 3/4 neutropenia in non‐Asian patients but not in Asian patients in this analysis (p > .10). However, as the number of Asian patients in these clinical trials was small, these data should be interpreted with caution. Together, given the limited number of Asian patients and the finding that ABCB1_rs1128503 and ERCC1_rs11615 were identified as potential independent risk factors for grade 3/4 neutropenia in non‐Asian patients, the differences in ABCB1_rs1128503 and ERCC1_rs11615 SNP allele frequencies between Asian and non‐Asian patients could be a potential factor that causes a higher incidence of neutropenia in Asian patients. Notably, age and weight/BMI were not associated with early occurrence of grade 3/4 neutropenia in Asian patients in the univariate analysis, whereas younger age was associated with early occurrence of grade 3/4 neutropenia in non‐Asian patients in the univariate analysis, but was not an independent factor for the early occurrence of grade 3/4 neutropenia in the multivariable analysis. These findings were consistent with previous reports that showed no apparent correlation between palbociclib post‐treatment ANC and age, weight, or body surface area (BSA)/BMI [17, 18]. Palbociclib is metabolized primarily by CYP3A and the SULT enzyme SULT2A1 [10]. The substrates and/or inhibitors of CYP3A and ABCB1 are thought to overlap with each other. Therefore, the association between ABCB1_rs1128503 or ABCB1_rs1045642 and palbociclib exposure was investigated in the current analyses. Our data suggest that differences in ABCB1_rs1128503 and ABCB1_rs1045642 genotyping did not affect palbociclib exposure. Previous findings showed no apparent correlation between palbociclib post‐treatment ANC and steady‐state trough concentrations [17, 18]. Taking into account our findings in the current analysis that ABCB1_rs1128503 was identified as a potential independent risk factor for grade 3/4 neutropenia, the difference in the incidence of neutropenia between Asian and non‐Asian patients might in part be due to the differences in ABCB1 activity that are correlated with ABCB1_rs1128503 and which differ between Asian and non‐Asian patients, and was not associated with palbociclib exposure. The geometric mean plasma palbociclib concentration was lower in non‐Asian patients than in Asian patients; however, individual values overlapped between Asian and non‐Asian patients. In addition, it was reported that no apparent correlation was observed between palbociclib post‐treatment ANC and steady‐state trough concentrations, body weight, or BSA/BMI, which suggested that the higher incidence of neutropenia observed in Japanese patients was not related to higher palbociclib exposure or lower body weight/BSA/BMI [17, 18]. Palbociclib treatment effect, as measured by mPFS and hazard ratios, was generally consistent across genetic variants and between studies. PFS was significantly prolonged with palbociclib plus ET compared with placebo plus ET in almost all genetic variants, although not statistically significant with ABCB1_rs1045642 T/T and ERCC1_rs3212986 A/A. Of note, the numbers of patients in each genetic variant subgroup were relatively small, and thus these findings should be interpreted cautiously. Overall, these findings support palbociclib plus ET as treatment for patients with HR+/HER2– ABC, regardless of which alleles of ABCB1 and ERCC1 they carry. In the current analysis, ABCB1_rs1128503 alleles were not associated with palbociclib exposure or efficacy. Additionally, a previous analysis reported that palbociclib dose reduction does not affect treatment efficacy [20]. One hypothesis is that in patients with neutropenia who require dose reduction, palbociclib pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic properties result in adequate exposure levels, leading to consistent efficacy. However, findings from previous studies suggest that the higher incidence of neutropenia was not due to higher palbociclib exposure but rather lower baseline ANC levels [17, 18]. The reason palbociclib dose reduction does not affect treatment efficacy is unclear, and further investigations are warranted. A limitation of the current analysis is that high multicollinearity existed among significant risk factors for the early occurrence of grade 3/4 neutropenia identified in the univariate analysis. Therefore, it may be challenging to draw a definitive conclusion from this analysis with the exclusion of covariates with high multicollinearity in the multivariable analysis models. In addition, large studies including populations with various ancestries are necessary to determine the impact of racial differences on SNP frequencies and to determine whether these differences are associated with variances in the incidences of neutropenia between racial subgroups [22]. The potential findings from this study warrant further investigation.

Conclusion

The current pharmacogenetic analyses potentially identified predictive risk factors that could help clinicians understand expectations associated with palbociclib treatment in patients with HR+/HER2– ABC with specific genetic variants; differences in ABCB1 and ERCC1 activity that are correlated with the common variants ABCB1_rs1128503 and ERCC1_rs11615 and that differ between the Asian and non‐Asian patients might have been a contributing factor to the higher incidence of neutropenia in Asian versus non‐Asian patients. Pharmacogenetic testing may inform, to some degree, about a potentially increased likelihood of a patient developing severe neutropenia that, in the future, could be used for monitoring or individualized dosing. However, such testing is not currently warranted because of the relatively tenuous relationship between test outcome and the event in question (neutropenia), as well as the limited impact on actual patient management, which would still be dictated by ANC counts observed under treatment.

Author Contributions

Conception/design: Hiroji Iwata, Yoshiko Umeyama, Yuan Liu, Zhe Zhang, Patrick Schnell, Yuko Mori, Olivia Fletcher, Masakazu Toi, Richard S. Finn, Nicholas C. Turner, Cynthia Huang Bartlett, Massimo Cristofanilli Collection and/or assembly of data: Yoshiko Umeyama, Yuan Liu, Patrick Schnell, Yuko Mori, Jean‐Claude Marshall, Jillian G. Johnson, Linda S. Wood Data analysis and interpretation: Hiroji Iwata, Yoshiko Umeyama, Yuan Liu, Zhe Zhang, Patrick Schnell, Yuko Mori, Olivia Fletcher, Jean‐Claude Marshall, Jillian G. Johnson, Linda S. Wood, Masakazu Toi, Richard S. Finn, Nicholas C. Turner, Cynthia Huang Bartlett, Massimo Cristofanilli Statistical analysis: Zhe Zhang Manuscript writing: Hiroji Iwata, Yoshiko Umeyama, Yuan Liu, Zhe Zhang, Patrick Schnell, Yuko Mori, Olivia Fletcher, Jean‐Claude Marshall, Jillian G. Johnson, Linda S. Wood, Masakazu Toi, Richard S. Finn, Nicholas C. Turner, Cynthia Huang Bartlett, Massimo Cristofanilli Final approval of manuscript: Hiroji Iwata, Yoshiko Umeyama, Yuan Liu, Zhe Zhang, Patrick Schnell, Yuko Mori, Olivia Fletcher, Jean‐Claude Marshall, Jillian G. Johnson, Linda S. Wood, Masakazu Toi, Richard S. Finn, Nicholas C. Turner, Cynthia Huang Bartlett, Massimo Cristofanilli

Disclosures

Hiroji Iwata: Chugai, Daiichi‐Sankyo (C/A), Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Chugai, Daiichi‐Sankyo, Novartis, Eli Lilly & Co (H); Yoshiko Umeyama: Pfizer (E, OI); Yuan Liu: Pfizer (E); Zhe Zhang: Pfizer (E); Patrick Schnell: Pfizer (E); Yuko Mori: Pfizer (E, OI); Jean‐Claude Marshall: Pfizer (E); Jillian G. Johnson: Pfizer (E); Linda S. Wood: Pfizer (E); Masakuazu Toi: Novartis, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Taiho, Chugai, Pfizer, Eisai, Eli Lilly & Co, Kyowa‐Hakko Kirin, Genomic Health Institute (H), Novartis, AstraZeneca, Taiho, Chugai, Pfizer, and Eli Lilly & Co (RF), Kyowa‐Hakko Kirin (C/A), Genomic Health Institute (SAB); Richard S. Finn: Pfizer, Bayer, Novartis, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Merck (C/A), Pfizer (RF), Bayer, Pfizer, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Novartis, Eisai, Eli Lilly & Co (H); Nicholas C. Turner: Pfizer (C/A), Pfizer, Eli Lilly & Co, Novartis (RF), Pfizer (H); Cynthia Huang Bartlett: Pfizer (E–former); Massimo Cristofanilli: Pfizer, Eli Lilly & Co, Novartis, Sermonix, G1 Therapeutics, CytoDyn, Foundation Medicine (C/A). Olivia Fletcher indicated no financial relationships. (C/A) Consulting/advisory relationship; (RF) Research funding; (E) Employment; (ET) Expert testimony; (H) Honoraria received; (OI) Ownership interests; (IP) Intellectual property rights/inventor/patent holder; (SAB) Scientific advisory board
  21 in total

1.  Very important pharmacogene summary: ABCB1 (MDR1, P-glycoprotein).

Authors:  Laura M Hodges; Svetlana M Markova; Leslie W Chinn; Jason M Gow; Deanna L Kroetz; Teri E Klein; Russ B Altman
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in combination with letrozole versus letrozole alone as first-line treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (PALOMA-1/TRIO-18): a randomised phase 2 study.

Authors:  Richard S Finn; John P Crown; Istvan Lang; Katalin Boer; Igor M Bondarenko; Sergey O Kulyk; Johannes Ettl; Ravindranath Patel; Tamas Pinter; Marcus Schmidt; Yaroslav Shparyk; Anu R Thummala; Nataliya L Voytko; Camilla Fowst; Xin Huang; Sindy T Kim; Sophia Randolph; Dennis J Slamon
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Fulvestrant plus palbociclib versus fulvestrant plus placebo for treatment of hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer that progressed on previous endocrine therapy (PALOMA-3): final analysis of the multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Massimo Cristofanilli; Nicholas C Turner; Igor Bondarenko; Jungsil Ro; Seock-Ah Im; Norikazu Masuda; Marco Colleoni; Angela DeMichele; Sherene Loi; Sunil Verma; Hiroji Iwata; Nadia Harbeck; Ke Zhang; Kathy Puyana Theall; Yuqiu Jiang; Cynthia Huang Bartlett; Maria Koehler; Dennis Slamon
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Mechanistic Investigation of Bone Marrow Suppression Associated with Palbociclib and its Differentiation from Cytotoxic Chemotherapies.

Authors:  Wenyue Hu; Tae Sung; Bart A Jessen; Stephane Thibault; Martin B Finkelstein; Nasir K Khan; Aida I Sacaan
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Drug-related genetic polymorphisms affecting severe chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in breast cancer patients: A hospital-based observational study.

Authors:  Daiki Tsuji; Midori Ikeda; Keisuke Yamamoto; Harumi Nakamori; Yong-Il Kim; Yohei Kawasaki; Aki Otake; Mari Yokoi; Kazuyuki Inoue; Keita Hirai; Hidenori Nakamichi; Umi Tokou; Mitsuru Shiokawa; Kunihiko Itoh
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Palbociclib in combination with fulvestrant in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: PALOMA-3 subgroup analysis of Japanese patients.

Authors:  Norikazu Masuda; Kenichi Inoue; Rikiya Nakamura; Yoshiaki Rai; Hirofumi Mukai; Shinji Ohno; Fumikata Hara; Yuko Mori; Satoshi Hashigaki; Yasuaki Muramatsu; Takashi Nagasawa; Yoshiko Umeyama; Xin Huang; Hiroji Iwata
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Palbociclib plus letrozole as first-line therapy in estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer with extended follow-up.

Authors:  H S Rugo; R S Finn; V Diéras; J Ettl; O Lipatov; A A Joy; N Harbeck; A Castrellon; S Iyer; D R Lu; A Mori; E R Gauthier; C Huang Bartlett; K A Gelmon; D J Slamon
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Palbociclib in combination with letrozole in patients with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: PALOMA-2 subgroup analysis of Japanese patients.

Authors:  Hirofumi Mukai; Chikako Shimizu; Norikazu Masuda; Shoichiro Ohtani; Shinji Ohno; Masato Takahashi; Yutaka Yamamoto; Reiki Nishimura; Nobuaki Sato; Shozo Ohsumi; Hiroji Iwata; Yuko Mori; Satoshi Hashigaki; Yasuaki Muramatsu; Takashi Nagasawa; Yoshiko Umeyama; Dongrui R Lu; Masakazu Toi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Palbociclib with Letrozole in Postmenopausal Women with ER+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer: Hematologic Safety Analysis of the Randomized PALOMA-2 Trial.

Authors:  Véronique Diéras; Nadia Harbeck; Anil Abraham Joy; Karen Gelmon; Johannes Ettl; Sunil Verma; Dongrui R Lu; Eric Gauthier; Patrick Schnell; Ave Mori; Hope S Rugo; Richard S Finn
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-06-19

10.  Functional polymorphisms of the human multidrug-resistance gene: multiple sequence variations and correlation of one allele with P-glycoprotein expression and activity in vivo.

Authors:  S Hoffmeyer; O Burk; O von Richter; H P Arnold; J Brockmöller; A Johne; I Cascorbi; T Gerloff; I Roots; M Eichelbaum; U Brinkmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effects of ABCB1 and ABCG2 polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of abemaciclib.

Authors:  Akimitsu Maeda; Hitoshi Ando; Kei Irie; Naoya Hashimoto; Jun-Ichi Morishige; Shoji Fukushima; Akira Okada; Hiromichi Ebi; Masahide Matsuzaki; Hiroji Iwata; Masataka Sawaki
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 2.  The Emerging Role of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitors in Treating Diet-Induced Obesity: New Opportunities for Breast and Ovarian Cancers?

Authors:  Reyes Benot-Dominguez; Annamaria Cimini; Daniela Barone; Antonio Giordano; Francesca Pentimalli
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  An Integrated Pharmacological Counselling Approach to Guide Decision-Making in the Treatment with CDK4/6 Inhibitors for Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Rossana Roncato; Lorenzo Gerratana; Lorenza Palmero; Sara Gagno; Ariana Soledad Poetto; Elena Peruzzi; Martina Zanchetta; Bianca Posocco; Elena De Mattia; Giovanni Canil; Martina Alberti; Marco Orleni; Giuseppe Toffoli; Fabio Puglisi; Erika Cecchin
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 5.988

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.