Literature DB >> 33955052

Psychological factors among Appalachian women with abnormal Pap results.

Adebola Adegboyega1, Mark Dignan2, Shuying Sha3, Chigozie Nkwonta4, Lovoria B Williams1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Women who receive an abnormal Pap result may experience negative psychological factors. The purpose of this study is to assess the baseline occurrence of negative psychological factors and evaluate the relationships between psychological factors and demographic characteristics among Appalachian women who received abnormal Pap results.
METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of data collected from Appalachia Kentucky women (N = 521) ages ≥18 enrolled in an intervention. Data included sociodemographics, Beck depression and anxiety inventories, fatalism, and personal control measures. Multiple variable logistic regression was used to investigate the association between demographics and psychological factors.
FINDINGS: Participants were predominantly White (96.2%), with mean age 28.93 ± 11.03 years, and the majority (77%) had yearly income below $20,000. Depression was reported by 34.6% (n = 173); 10% (n = 50) experienced moderate or severe anxiety; 20.6% (n = 107) had fatalistic beliefs; and 55.1% (n = 289) believed they lacked personal control over cancer. Women with lower income had higher occurrence of depression (P = .003). Women with moderate to severe anxiety were significantly older than those with low to moderate depression (34.44 vs 28.34, P < .001). Controlling for other variables, as age increased, the odds of fatalistic beliefs increased, OR (95%) = 1.042 (1.022, 1.062). When education level increased, the odds of fatalistic beliefs decreased, OR (95%) = 0.873 (0.800, 0.952).
CONCLUSIONS: Given the high occurrence of depression, anxiety, and fatalistic beliefs among this population, health care providers should assess for underlying mental health diagnoses and psychological distress during each patient encounter and provide recommendations to address them.
© 2021 National Rural Health Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Appalachian; Pap screening; abnormal Pap results; cervical cancer; psychological factors

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33955052      PMCID: PMC8571115          DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rural Health        ISSN: 0890-765X            Impact factor:   4.333


  36 in total

1.  Deconstructing fatalism: ethnographic perspectives on women's decision making about cancer prevention and treatment.

Authors:  Elaine M Drew; Nancy E Schoenberg
Journal:  Med Anthropol Q       Date:  2011-06

2.  American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Debbie Saslow; Diane Solomon; Herschel W Lawson; Maureen Killackey; Shalini L Kulasingam; Joanna Cain; Francisco A R Garcia; Ann T Moriarty; Alan G Waxman; David C Wilbur; Nicolas Wentzensen; Levi S Downs; Mark Spitzer; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Eduardo L Franco; Mark H Stoler; Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Evan R Myers
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  Health Beliefs and Breast Cancer Screening Practices Among African American Women in California.

Authors:  Claudia M Davis
Journal:  Int Q Community Health Educ       Date:  2020-07-13

4.  Anxiety and depressive symptoms and missing breast cancer and cervical screening: results from Brazos valley community health survey.

Authors:  Xiaoying Zhang; Rahma Mkuu; Elfreda Samman; Shelby Cummings; Ledric Sherman; Lisa T Wigfall; Larrell Wilkinson; James N Burdine
Journal:  Psychol Health Med       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 2.423

5.  The relationship between health locus of control, depression, and sociodemographic factors and amount of time breast cancer patients wait before seeking diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Inga Marijanović; Gordana Pavleković; Teo Buhovac; Marko Martinac
Journal:  Psychiatr Danub       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.063

6.  The psychosocial impact of an abnormal cervical smear result.

Authors:  Mélanie Drolet; Marc Brisson; Elizabeth Maunsell; Eduardo L Franco; François Coutlée; Alex Ferenczy; William Fisher; James A Mansi
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Effect of health beliefs on delays in care for abnormal cervical cytology in a multi-ethnic population.

Authors:  Karin Nelson; Ann M Geiger; Carol M Mangione
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Women's knowledge and experience of atypical Pap results in a high risk community.

Authors:  M Diane McKee; Arlene Caban; William Burton; Michael Mulvihill
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2002

9.  Effectiveness of an Intervention for Adherence to Follow-up Recommendations for Abnormal Pap Tests in Appalachian Kentucky.

Authors:  Mark Dignan; Carol White; Nancy Schoenberg; Brent Shelton; Frances Feltner; Stacey Slone; Emily Van Meter; Christopher DeSimone; Gretchen Ely
Journal:  Health Behav Policy Rev       Date:  2014-01

10.  Understanding masked depression: A Clinical scenario.

Authors:  Prasad Shetty; Akshata Mane; Sourabh Fulmali; Ganesh Uchit
Journal:  Indian J Psychiatry       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.759

View more
  1 in total

1.  Depression before and after diagnostic procedures among women with abnormal finding of Papanicolaou screening test.

Authors:  Irena Ilic; Goran Babic; Aleksandra Dimitrijevic; Sandra Sipetic Grujicic; Milena D Ilic
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 4.711

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.