Jacob Szeszulski1, Timothy J Walker2, Sheryl A McCurdy3, Deanna M Hoelscher4. 1. The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research and the Michael & Susan Dell Center for Healthy Living, 7000 Fannin St #2528, Houston, TX, 77030., USA. 2. The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, 7000 Fannin St #2630, Houston, TX, USA, 77030. 3. The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, 7000 Fannin St #2572, Houston, Texas, USA, 77030. 4. The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth) School of Public Health, Austin Campus, Michael & Susan Dell Center for Healthy Living, 1616 Guadalupe St., Suite 6.300, Austin, TX, USA, 78701.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Federal law requires most school districts to develop school wellness policies (SWPs), which state agencies assist in by providing templates. Templates provide standard language, which districts may edit for numerous reasons. We aimed to identify the frequency/consistency of template usage and identify the types of edits districts make when using SWP templates. METHODS: We identified SWPs (N = 117) and templates (N = 2) from districts in 1 Texas public health region. We developed template specific coding guides, which allowed us to examine the frequency SWPs used template text within multiple areas (eg, nutrition goals, reporting). We also collected/categorized SWP edits from the template text and conducted a thematic analysis of locally developed SWPs and SWP templates. RESULTS: Of 117 SWPs, 81.2% used a 2020 template, 13.7% used a 2005 template, and 5.1% created their own SWP. Across template-based SWPs, 44 content edits (0.4 per policy) occurred in 9 categories. Thematic analysis revealed: (1) locally developed SWPs created an informed mission statement linked to their goals; (2) Locally developed SWPs provided details that the current template includes in wellness plans. CONCLUSIONS: Most districts used exact template language when writing their SWP. Adding spaces where districts can specify details could improve SWP content.
BACKGROUND: Federal law requires most school districts to develop school wellness policies (SWPs), which state agencies assist in by providing templates. Templates provide standard language, which districts may edit for numerous reasons. We aimed to identify the frequency/consistency of template usage and identify the types of edits districts make when using SWP templates. METHODS: We identified SWPs (N = 117) and templates (N = 2) from districts in 1 Texas public health region. We developed template specific coding guides, which allowed us to examine the frequency SWPs used template text within multiple areas (eg, nutrition goals, reporting). We also collected/categorized SWP edits from the template text and conducted a thematic analysis of locally developed SWPs and SWP templates. RESULTS: Of 117 SWPs, 81.2% used a 2020 template, 13.7% used a 2005 template, and 5.1% created their own SWP. Across template-based SWPs, 44 content edits (0.4 per policy) occurred in 9 categories. Thematic analysis revealed: (1) locally developed SWPs created an informed mission statement linked to their goals; (2) Locally developed SWPs provided details that the current template includes in wellness plans. CONCLUSIONS: Most districts used exact template language when writing their SWP. Adding spaces where districts can specify details could improve SWP content.
Authors: Marlene B Schwartz; Anne E Lund; H Mollie Grow; Elaine McDonnell; Claudia Probart; Anne Samuelson; Leslie Lytle Journal: J Am Diet Assoc Date: 2009-07
Authors: Rebecca Boehm; Marlene B Schwartz; Ann Lowenfels; Ian Brissette; Mary Jo Pattison; Jia Ren Journal: J Sch Health Date: 2020-03-27 Impact factor: 2.118
Authors: Amelia R DeFosset; Megala Sivashanmugam; Lauren N Gase; Elaine Lai; Grace Tan; Tony Kuo Journal: J Sch Health Date: 2019-12-11 Impact factor: 2.118
Authors: Sara J Long; Hannah Littlecott; Jemma Hawkins; Gemma Eccles; Adam Fletcher; Gillian Hewitt; Simon Murphy; Graham F Moore Journal: J Sch Health Date: 2020-03-03 Impact factor: 2.460
Authors: Sarah Classen; Jacob Szeszulski; Nalini Ranjit; Genesis Rivas-Ponce; Deanna M Hoelscher Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-04-20 Impact factor: 4.614