David M Levine1,2, Mary Paz3, Kimberly Burke4, Jeffrey L Schnipper5,6. 1. Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. dmlevine@bwh.harvard.edu. 2. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. dmlevine@bwh.harvard.edu. 3. Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 4. University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA. 5. Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 6. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acute care at home ("home hospital") compared to traditional hospital care has been shown to lower cost, utilization, and readmission and improve patient experience and physical activity. Despite these benefits, many patients decline to enroll in home hospital. OBJECTIVE: Describe predictors and reasons why patients decline home hospital. DESIGN: Mixed methods evaluation of a randomized controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: Patients in the emergency department who required admission and were accepted for home hospital by the home hospital attending, but ultimately declined to enroll. INTERVENTION: Home hospital care, including nurse and physician home visits, intravenous medications, remote monitoring, video communication, and point-of-care testing. APPROACH: We conducted a thematic content analysis of verbatim reasons for decline. We performed bivariate comparisons then multivariable logistic regression to identify patient characteristics associated with declining participation. KEY RESULTS: Two hundred forty-eight patients were eligible to enroll, and 157 (63%) declined enrollment. Patients who declined and enrolled were of similar age (median age, 74 vs 75 years old; p = 0.27), sex (32% vs 36% female; p = 0.49), and race/ethnicity (p = 0.26). In multivariable analysis, patients were significantly more likely to decline if they initially presented at the community hospital compared to the academic medical center (53% vs 42%; adjusted OR, 2.2 [95% CI, 1.2 to 4.2]) and if single (37% v 24%; adjusted OR, 2.5 [95% CI, 1.2 to 5.1]). We formulated 10 qualitative categories describing reasons patients ultimately declined. Many patients declined because they felt it was easier to remain in the hospital (20%) or felt safer in the hospital than in their home (20%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who declined to enroll in a home hospital intervention had similar sociodemographic characteristics as enrollees except partner status and declined most often for perceptions surrounding safety at home and the ease of remaining in the hospital. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03203759.
BACKGROUND: Acute care at home ("home hospital") compared to traditional hospital care has been shown to lower cost, utilization, and readmission and improve patient experience and physical activity. Despite these benefits, many patients decline to enroll in home hospital. OBJECTIVE: Describe predictors and reasons why patients decline home hospital. DESIGN: Mixed methods evaluation of a randomized controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: Patients in the emergency department who required admission and were accepted for home hospital by the home hospital attending, but ultimately declined to enroll. INTERVENTION: Home hospital care, including nurse and physician home visits, intravenous medications, remote monitoring, video communication, and point-of-care testing. APPROACH: We conducted a thematic content analysis of verbatim reasons for decline. We performed bivariate comparisons then multivariable logistic regression to identify patient characteristics associated with declining participation. KEY RESULTS: Two hundred forty-eight patients were eligible to enroll, and 157 (63%) declined enrollment. Patients who declined and enrolled were of similar age (median age, 74 vs 75 years old; p = 0.27), sex (32% vs 36% female; p = 0.49), and race/ethnicity (p = 0.26). In multivariable analysis, patients were significantly more likely to decline if they initially presented at the community hospital compared to the academic medical center (53% vs 42%; adjusted OR, 2.2 [95% CI, 1.2 to 4.2]) and if single (37% v 24%; adjusted OR, 2.5 [95% CI, 1.2 to 5.1]). We formulated 10 qualitative categories describing reasons patients ultimately declined. Many patients declined because they felt it was easier to remain in the hospital (20%) or felt safer in the hospital than in their home (20%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who declined to enroll in a home hospital intervention had similar sociodemographic characteristics as enrollees except partner status and declined most often for perceptions surrounding safety at home and the ease of remaining in the hospital. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03203759.
Authors: Gideon A Caplan; Nur S Sulaiman; Dee A Mangin; Nicoletta Aimonino Ricauda; Andrew D Wilson; Louise Barclay Journal: Med J Aust Date: 2012-11-05 Impact factor: 7.738
Authors: David M Levine; Kei Ouchi; Bonnie Blanchfield; Keren Diamond; Adam Licurse; Charles T Pu; Jeffrey L Schnipper Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-02-06 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Pamela Saenger; Alex D Federman; Linda V DeCherrie; Sara Lubetsky; Elisse Catalan; Bruce Leff; Albert L Siu Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2020-05-06 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: David M Levine; Julia Pian; Karthiyayini Mahendrakumar; Apexa Patel; Agustina Saenz; Jeffrey L Schnipper Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-01-21 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Kushal T Kadakia; Celynne A Balatbat; Albert L Siu; I Glenn Cohen; Consuelo H Wilkins; Victor J Dzau; Anaeze C Offodile 2nd Journal: Milbank Q Date: 2022-09-23 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: David M Levine; Mary Paz; Kimberly Burke; Ryan Beaumont; Robert B Boxer; Charles A Morris; Kathryn A Britton; E John Orav; Jeffrey L Schnipper Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-08-01
Authors: Kei Ouchi; Shan Liu; Daniel Tonellato; Yonatan G Keschner; Maura Kennedy; David M Levine Journal: J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open Date: 2021-07-21
Authors: Emma J Dennett; Sadia Janjua; Elizabeth Stovold; Samantha L Harrison; Melissa J McDonnell; Anne E Holland Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-07-26