| Literature DB >> 33954801 |
Francesca Sampogna1, Melinda González, Mirella Pascini-Garrigós, Neus Calbet-Llopart, Jennifer L Hay, Bruce S Bauer, Susana Puig, Josep Malvehy, Ashfaq A Marghoob, Cristina Carrera.
Abstract
Surgical attempts to remove large/giant congenital melanocytic naevi (LGCMN) are supported mainly by the theoretical improvement in patients' self-image; however such surgery can result in unaesthetic scarring. We hypothesize that difference in appearance itself has an impact, and hence surgery cannot negate this impact. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to explore how LGCMN and scarring are perceived by non-affected people. We surveyed the visual impact on 1,015 health and non-health professionals working in a university hospital. Participants were assigned to 1 of 3 surveys, which, based on photographs of children: (i) assessed the visual impact of LGCMN; (ii) the visual impact of scarring; (iii) compared the impact of LGCMN and scarring. Feelings and perceptions evoked by images of children, either with LGCMN or with scarring, were remarkably similar. However, when the images of the same child (with LGCMN or scarring) were shown together, respondents showed significantly increased preference for scarring.Entities:
Keywords: congenital melanocytic naevi; scarring; surgery; survey; visual impact; feelings
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33954801 PMCID: PMC9380263 DOI: 10.2340/00015555-3826
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Derm Venereol ISSN: 0001-5555 Impact factor: 3.875