Literature DB >> 33954333

Decision-making framework for an acute care clinical pharmacist productivity model: Part 1.

Tyler A Vest1, Adrienne Simmons2,3, Kathryn A Morbitzer2, Jacqueline E McLaughlin2, Jonathan Cicci3, Megan Clarke3, John M Valgus3, Chris Falato3, Kayla M Waldron3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Clinical pharmacist productivity assessment has long been challenging, as a standard definition does not exist. A multistep project was undertaken with the intent to develop, validate, and implement an acute care clinical pharmacist productivity model. The initial step of the project was designed to identify, define, prioritize, and weight a comprehensive list of daily pharmacist responsibilities stratified by relative time spent on each function via consensus.
METHODS: Delphi methodology applied by a panel of experts was used to identify a comprehensive list of acute care pharmacist responsibilities ranked in order of time intensity. Twenty-three acute care clinical pharmacists participated in the process. The consensus list was validated by time observation studies. Each responsibility was assigned a weight and corresponding work outputs by a consensus panel. Weighting of each responsibility was assigned according to the relative time intensity and complexity of each task.
RESULTS: The results of the Delphi consensus process included the top 20 time-intensive responsibilities identified by the acute care clinical pharmacists. Timed observations of acute care clinical pharmacists yielded results similar to those of the consensus process. Selection of corresponding work outputs and weights for each responsibility provided the final requirements for the productivity model.
CONCLUSION: The development of an acute care clinical pharmacist productivity model first requires the selection of appropriate work outputs and weighting. The consensus process provided a newly identified comprehensive list of pharmacist responsibilities that will serve as the foundation of the clinical productivity model. Validated consensus methodology can be useful for engaging clinical pharmacists in decision-making and the development of a clinical productivity model. © American Society of Health-System Pharmacists 2021. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  benchmarking; clinical pharmacist; consensus; metrics; practice model; productivity

Year:  2021        PMID: 33954333      PMCID: PMC8136020          DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/zxab194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm        ISSN: 1079-2082            Impact factor:   2.637


  1 in total

1.  Formation and validation of an acute care clinical pharmacist productivity model: Part 2.

Authors:  Adrienne Simmons; Tyler A Vest; Jonathan Cicci; Megan Clarke; Kathryn A Morbitzer; John M Valgus; Chris Falato; Evan W Colmenares; Mary-Haston Vest; Kayla M Waldron
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 2.637

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.