| Literature DB >> 33954222 |
Yanbin Pi1, Yuelin Hu1, Qinwei Guo1, Dong Jiang1, Xin Xie1, Feng Zhao1, Linxin Chen1, Yingfang Ao1, Chen Jiao1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although endoscopic calcaneoplasty and retrocalcaneal debridement have been extensively applied to treat Haglund syndrome, evidence of the value of the endoscopic procedure remains to be fully established. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to compare the postoperative outcomes and the amount of osteotomy between open and endoscopic surgery for the treatment of Haglund syndrome. It was hypothesized that endoscopic calcaneoplasty would lead to higher patient satisfaction and lower complication rates compared with open surgical techniques. STUDYEntities:
Keywords: Haglund deformity; calcaneoplasty; endoscopic procedure; retrocalcaneal impingement
Year: 2021 PMID: 33954222 PMCID: PMC8058802 DOI: 10.1177/23259671211001055
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orthop J Sports Med ISSN: 2325-9671
Figure 1.Signs of Haglund syndrome on (A) sagittal and (B) axial magnetic resonance imaging: retrocalcaneal bursitis (orange arrow), bone marrow edema (orange arrowhead), bony spur (white arrow), and Achilles tendon diameter (double-headed dashed arrow in both images). The intratendinous hyperintensity of the Achilles tendon in this patient was classified as Pomranz grade 1b.
Figure 2.Study flowchart.
Figure 3.Endoscopic procedure for Haglund syndrome. (A and B) Retrocalcaneal impingement as visualized on magnetic resonance imaging. (A) Sagittal view with bone marrow edema (arrowhead). (B) Axial view with retrocalcaneal bursitis (white arrow). (C and D) Lateral ankle radiographs (C) with enlargement of posterosuperior calcaneal tuberosity with Haglund deformity (arrow) and (D) after posterosuperior calcaneal tuberosity was excised.
Figure 4.Characteristics of Haglund deformity as measured on preoperative lateral ankle radiographs. (A) The parallel pitch lines were obtained by drawing the inferior line from the inferior margin of the calcaneocuboid joint to the plantar tuberosity of the calcaneus; the superior line was drawn parallel to the inferior line beginning at the posterior margin of the subtalar joint. If the posterior calcaneal prominence was located above the superior line (arrow), it was considered abnormal and consistent with Haglund deformity. (B) The Haglund deformity height was obtained by drawing a line at the base of the posterosuperior calcaneal prominence and measuring the height of Haglund deformity perpendicular to that line (double-headed arrow). (C) The Chauveaux-Liet angle was measured as (α – β), where α is the inclination angle and β is the posterior angle of the calcaneus. (D) The Fowler-Philip angle was measured between an inferior line that was tangent to the inferior margin of the calcaneocuboid joint and the plantar tuberosity of the calcaneus and a superior line that was tangent to the posterior prominence at the insertion of the Achilles tendon.
Figure 5.Radiographic parameters on postoperative radiographs. (A) Pitch line. (B) Haglund deformity height (double-headed arrow). (C) The calcaneal height ratio (CHR), calcaneal resection ratio (CRR), and calcaneal resection angle were measured as follows. The following landmarks were identified: the most inferior point of the posterior tuberosity, A; the inferior edge of the anterior calcaneus at the calcaneocuboid joint, B; the inferior parallel pitch line, line AB; the most posterior extension of the superior pitch line in panel (A), C; the exit point of the osteotomy from the posterior calcaneal tuberosity, D; the distance from the superior pitch line to the point of Achilles insertion, b; and the distance from the superior pitch line to point D, h. These landmarks were used to calculate the CHR (ratio of h and H), CRR (ratio of h and b), and calcaneal resection angle (θ; between the inferior pitch line and a line of best fit along the calcaneal resection).
Patient and MRI Characteristics Between Groups
| Endoscopy (n = 27) | Open (n = 20) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patient characteristics | |||
| Age, y | 35.6 ± 12.8 | 38.5 ± 11.0 | .617 |
| Sex, male/female, n | 21/6 | 15/5 | .661 |
| BMI | 24.55 ± 2.03 | 25.42 ± 3.34 | .524 |
| Time of follow-up, mo | 35.81 ± 19.48 | 41.35 ± 15.70 | .090 |
| Onset time of symptoms, mo | 30.25 ± 20.23 | 29.57 ± 25.83 | .518 |
| Corticosteroid administration, % | 9.52 | 9.68 | .795 |
| MRI characteristics | |||
| Retrocalcaneal bursitis, n | 25 | 16 | .480 |
| Pomranz classification, 0/1a/1b, n | 7/10/10 | 7/7/6 | .433 |
| Bone marrow edema, n | 26 | 15 | .090 |
| Calcification, n | 3 | 5 | .253 |
| Bony spur, n | 5 | 6 | .461 |
| Achilles tendon thickness, mm | 8.47 ± 1.41 | 8.95 ± 1.49 | .375 |
Data are reported as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated. BMI, body mass index; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
Postoperative Clinical Outcomes in the Endoscopic and Open Groups
| Endoscopy (n = 27) | Open (n = 20) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| VAS-pain | 1.5 ± 1.8 | 0.9 ± 1.2 | .36 |
| AOFAS | 92.1 ± 8.0 | 96.1 ± 5.1 | .22 |
| FFI | 3.7 ± 4.7 | 2.1 ± 2.7 | .25 |
| Tegner score | 3.9 ± 1.9 | 3.2 ± 1.2 | .32 |
| AAS | 5.0 ± 2.5 | 4.1 ± 1.6 | .31 |
| SF-36 domain | |||
| PF | 87.3 ± 13.2 | 86.5 ± 9.9 | .87 |
| RP | 75.3 ± 26.9 | 72 ± 15.7 | .72 |
| BP | 80.8 ± 18.0 | 78.9 ± 13.1 | .77 |
| GH | 77.9 ± 19.7 | 84.3 ± 11.8 | .34 |
| VT | 83 ± 13.7 | 84.6 ± 6.6 | .76 |
| SF | 90.3 ± 10.3 | 96.6 ± 5.4 | .10 |
| RE | 80.1 ± 23.9 | 73.8 ± 10.1 | .40 |
| MH | 91.3 ± 14.0 | 96.8 ± 5.9 | .33 |
Data are reported as mean ± SD. AAS, Ankle Activity Score; AOFAS, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society; BP, body pain; FFI, Foot Function Index; GH, general health status; MH, mental health; PF, physical functioning; RE, role emotional; RP, role physical; SF, social functioning; SF-36, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey; VAS, visual analog scale; VT, vitality.
Figure 6.Learning curve for duration of operation according to number of operations performed for each of the 6 surgeons (represented by a-f) who performed endoscopic calcaneoplasty. a: solid blue dot; b: solid orange square; c: solid green dot; d: solid green diamond; e: purple cross; f: solid red triangle.
Postoperative Radiological Measurement for Bony Resection in Endoscopic and Open Groups
| Endoscopy (n = 27) | Open (n = 20) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcaneal resection angle (θ), deg | 25.3 ± 11.7 | 27.9 ± 10.0 | .60 |
| Calcaneal height ratio | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | .26 |
| Calcaneal resection ratio | 0.5 ± 0.2 | 0.5 ± 0.2 | .29 |
| Postoperative pitch line, % | 9.1 | 13.0 | .55 |
| Haglund deformity height, mm | 5.0 ± 1.6 | 5.2 ± 2.7 | .70 |
Data are reported as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated.