| Literature DB >> 33954121 |
Sofía V Sánchez1,2,3, Nicolás Navarro1,2,3, Johanna Catalán-Figueroa4,5, Javier O Morales1,2,3.
Abstract
Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most common reasons for antibiotic treatment. Nevertheless, uropathogens are steadily becoming resistant to currently available therapies. In this context, nanotechnology emerges as an innovative and promising approach among diverse strategies currently under development. In this review we deeply discuss different nanoparticles (NPs) used in UTI treatment, including organic NPs, nanodiamonds, chemical and green synthesized inorganic NPs, and NPs made of composite materials. In addition, we compare the effects of different NPs against uropathogens in vivo and in vitro and discuss their potential impact the in the near future.Entities:
Keywords: antibacterial; antibiofilm; composite materials; inorganic nanoparticles; organic nanoparticles; urinary tract infection therapies
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33954121 PMCID: PMC8089393 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.656496
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Physicochemical characteristics of organic nanoparticles.
| Organic NPs | REF | Functional group | Diameter (nm) | ζ - potential (mV) | Tested uropathogens | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aminocellulose nanospheres | ( | Primary amine | 268 ± 7 | 103 ± 2 |
| Antibiofilm | |
| Aminocellulose nanospheres/hyaluronic acid construct | ( | Hyaluronic acid | 268 ± 7 | 103 ± 2 |
| Antibiofilm | |
| Glycerol monolaurate nanocapsules | ( | – | 190.7 ± 2 | -23.3 ± 3 |
| Antibiofilm | |
| Chlorhexidine-loaded poly(ε-caprolactone) nanospheres | ( | poly(ε-caprolactone) | 198.8 ± 6.9 | – |
| Antibacterial | |
| Chlorhexidine-loaded poly(ε-caprolactone) nanospheres | ( | poly(ε-caprolactone) | 152 ± 37 | 40.21 ± 1.08 |
| Antibacterial | |
| Polyurethane chlorhexidine nanocomposites | ( | – | – | – |
| Antibacterial | |
| Kanamycin-chitosan nanoparticles | ( | NA | 225 | 36 |
| Antibacterial | |
| Antibiofilm | |||||||
| Chlorin e6 encapsulated charge-conversion polymeric nanoparticles | ( | poly (β-amino ester)s | 33.5 ± 4.5 | -6 |
| Antibacterial | |
| chitosan-coated poly(lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticles loaded with amphotericin B | ( | poly(lactide-co-glycolide) | 459 ± 22 | 18 ± 3.5 |
| Antifungal | |
| Nano catechin | ( | – | 100 – 200 | – |
| Antibacterial | |
| Polyphenol 60 and curcumin nanoemulsion based gel (intravaginal) | ( | – | 211.2 | -32.7 | UPEC | Antibacterial | |
| polyphenol 60 + cranberry nanoemulsion based gel (intravaginal) | ( | – | 58 | -16 |
| Antibacterial | |
| Polyphenol 60 and ciprofloxacin | ( | – | 151.7 | 55.3 |
| Antibacterial | |
| Bilayer nanocapsules containing lutA antigen (vaccine) | ( | – | 200 ± 2 | 42 ± 4 |
| Vaccine |
Physicochemical characteristics of nanodiamonds.
| Nanodiamonds | REF | Functional group | Diameter (nm) | Tested uropathogens | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nanodiamonds | ( | – | 6 | UPEC | Antibacterial |
| 25 | |||||
| Trimeric thiomannoside cluster conjugated to nanodiamond particles | ( | Thiomannoside | 125 ± 9 |
| Antiadhesive |
Physicochemical characteristic of silver-based NPs.
| Silver based inorganic NPs | REF | Abbreviation | Diameter (nm) | ζ - potential (mV) | Tested Uropathogens | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silver nanoparticles | ( | AgNps | 9 – 24 | NA |
| Antibacterial |
| Silver boron nanoparticles | ( | AgB NPs | 25.46 | NA |
| Antibiofilm |
| Ag/ZnO nanoparticles | ( | Ag/ZnO NPs | 12 | NA |
| Antibacterial |
| Silver nanoparticles-ampicilin | ( | AgNPs-AMP | 4.01 ± 0.80 | 51.00 ± 20.20 |
| Antibacterial |
| Silver nanoparticles-amikacin | ( | AgNPs-AMK | 6.03 ± 0.87 | -21.10 ± 4.63 |
| Antibacterial |
| Silver nanoparticles functionalized with L-fucose | ( | FNPs | 8 – 10 | -17.7 |
| Antibacterial |
| Cationic silver nanoclusters coated with low molecular weight polyehylenimine | ( | bPEI-Ag NCs | 3 | 30 |
| Antibacterial |
Physicochemical properties of green silver-based NPs.
| Green silver based NPs | REF | Functional group | Diameter (nm) | ζ - potential (mV) | Tested uropathogens | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silver nanoparticles | ( | Hydroxyl | 30-50 | – |
| Antibacterial |
| Ag-embedded mesoporous silica nanoparticles | ( | – | 15 - 50 AgNps/400 mSiO2 | – | C. albicans | Antifungal |
| Silver nanoparticles | ( | Phenolic compounds | <100 | – |
| Antibacterial |
| Silver nanoparticles | ( |
| 70–90 | – |
| Antibiofilm |
|
| ( | Amide | 156.4 | − 23.1 |
| Antibiofilm |
| Antiquorum sensing | ||||||
| Silver nanoparticles | ( | – | 87 | – |
| Antibacterial |
Physical characteristics of copper-based NPs.
| Copper-based NPs | REF | Diameter (nm) | Tested uropathogens | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper oxide nanoparticles | ( | 25 - 30 | MRSA and | Antibiofilm |
| Zn-doped copper oxide nanoparticles | ( | 35 - 95 |
| Antibiofilm |
Physical characteristics of green copper-based NPs.
| Green copper-based NPs | REF | Functional group | Diameter (nm) | Tested uropathogens | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper oxide nanoparticles | ( | Phenolic compounds ( | 15 - 25 |
| Antibacterial |
| Copper sulfide nanoparticles | ( | Hydroxyl and phenolic compounds | 10–80 |
| Antibacterial |
| Copper oxide nanoparticles | ( | Hydroxyl and phenolic compounds | 48 | UPEC | Antibacterial |
Physicochemical characteristics of zinc-based NPs.
| Zinc-based NPs | REF | Functional group | Diameter (nm) | ζ - potential (mV) | Tested uropathogens | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zinc oxide nanoparticles | ( | Carboxylate | 29.79 | – |
| Antibacterial |
| Zinc oxide nanoparticles | ( | NA | 10–30 | – | UPEC | Antibiofilm |
| Magnesium-doped zinc oxide nanoparticles | ( | Hydroxyl/Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose | 15.2 | -1.9 |
| Antibiofilm |
| Zinc oxide nanoparticles | ( | – | 20 - 40 | – |
| Antifungal |
| Zinc oxide nanoparticles | ( | – | 20 - 50 | – |
| Antibiofilm |
| Zinc oxide nanoparticles/cefotaxime/ampicilin/ceftraxone/cefepime | ( | – | 15 | – |
| Antibiofilm |
| Green Zinc oxide nanosheets | ( | Hydroxyl | 500 | – |
| Antibiofilm |
Physicochemical characteristics of gold-based NPs.
| Gold-based NPs | REF | Functional group | Diameter (nm) | ζ - potential (mV) | Tested Uropathogens | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gold nanoparticles | ( | Amino-pyrimidine | 3.1 | – |
| Antibacterial |
| Gold nanoparticles | ( | Quaternary ammonium | 2 | – |
| Antibacterial |
| Gold nanoparticles conjugated with chlorhexidine | ( | – | 20 - 100 | – |
| Antibiofilm |
| Silica coated gold nanorods loaded with verteporfin | ( | – | 20 ± 3 nm (length/diameter AR 3.5 ± 0.3) | -16 |
| Antibacterial |
Physicochemical characteristics of silica-based NPs.
| Silica-based NPs | REF | Functional group | Diameter (nm) | Tested uropathogens | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silica titania sieves containing izohidrafural | ( | Hydroxyl | Size of pores 4.5 nm |
| Antibacterial |
| Siliconoxide nanoparticles conjugated to tannase | ( | Tannase | 92 |
| Antibacterial |
| Phenazine-1-carboxamide functionalized mesoporoussilica nanoparticles | ( | Phenazine 1 carboxamide | Size of pores 6.43 nm |
| Antifungal |
| Mixture of | Antibacterial | ||||
|
| Antibiofilm |
Physicochemical characteristics of inorganic NPs.
| Silica-based NPs | REF | Functional group | Diameter (nm) | ζ - potential (mV) | Tested uropathogens | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hydroxyapatite nanoparticles | ( | – | 200 | – |
| Antibiofilm |
| Sulfur nanoparticles/Catharanthus roseus leaf extract | ( | – | 53 | -9.24 |
| Antibacterial |
| Tungsten nanoparticles | ( | – | 8.1 | – |
| Antibiofilm |
|
| Antibacterial | |||||
| Neodymium doped nickel oxide nanoparticles | ( | Hydroxyl | 28 | – |
| Antibacterial |
Physicochemical characteristics of composite materials-based NPs.
| Composite materials NPs | REF | Functional group | Diameter (nm) | ζ - potential (mV) | Tested Uropathogens | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZnO@ZIF8 nanocomposite | ( | Imidazole | 566 | – |
| Antibacterial |
| Antibiofilm | ||||||
| Silver polytetrafluorethylene nanocomposite | ( | – | 50 - 200 AgNps/150 PTFE Nps | – |
| Antibacterial |
| Antiadhesive | ||||||
| Hydrogel containing copper nanoparticles composite | ( | Hydroxyl and carboxyl | 7 | – |
| Antibacterial |
| Tetraether lipids coated silver nanoparticles embedded in a PLGA film loaded with norfloxacin | ( | – | 9.2 ± 2.5 | – |
| Antibacterial |
| Silver bearing degradable polymeric nanoparticles of polyphosphoester-block-poly(L-lactide) | ( | – | 25 -35 | -47 | UPEC, | Antibacterial |
| Raman encoded silver coated gold nanorods | ( | – | 25 | -25 | UPEC | Antibacterial |