Literature DB >> 33953415

Projected land ice contributions to twenty-first-century sea level rise.

Tamsin L Edwards1, Sophie Nowicki2,3, Ben Marzeion4,5, Regine Hock6,7, Heiko Goelzer8,9,10, Hélène Seroussi11, Nicolas C Jourdain12, Donald A Slater13,14,15, Fiona E Turner16, Christopher J Smith17,18, Christine M McKenna17, Erika Simon2, Ayako Abe-Ouchi19, Jonathan M Gregory20,21, Eric Larour11, William H Lipscomb22, Antony J Payne23, Andrew Shepherd24, Cécile Agosta25, Patrick Alexander26,27, Torsten Albrecht28, Brian Anderson29, Xylar Asay-Davis30, Andy Aschwanden6, Alice Barthel30, Andrew Bliss31, Reinhard Calov28, Christopher Chambers32, Nicolas Champollion4,12, Youngmin Choi11,33, Richard Cullather2, Joshua Cuzzone11, Christophe Dumas25, Denis Felikson2,34, Xavier Fettweis35, Koji Fujita36, Benjamin K Galton-Fenzi37,38, Rupert Gladstone39, Nicholas R Golledge29, Ralf Greve32,40, Tore Hattermann41,42, Matthew J Hoffman30, Angelika Humbert43,44, Matthias Huss45,46,47, Philippe Huybrechts48, Walter Immerzeel49, Thomas Kleiner43, Philip Kraaijenbrink49, Sébastien Le Clec'h48, Victoria Lee50, Gunter R Leguy22, Christopher M Little51, Daniel P Lowry52, Jan-Hendrik Malles4,5, Daniel F Martin53, Fabien Maussion54, Mathieu Morlighem33, James F O'Neill16, Isabel Nias2,55, Frank Pattyn9, Tyler Pelle33, Stephen F Price30, Aurélien Quiquet25, Valentina Radić56, Ronja Reese28, David R Rounce6,57, Martin Rückamp43, Akiko Sakai36, Courtney Shafer53, Nicole-Jeanne Schlegel11, Sarah Shannon23, Robin S Smith20, Fiammetta Straneo13, Sainan Sun9, Lev Tarasov58, Luke D Trusel59, Jonas Van Breedam48, Roderik van de Wal8,49, Michiel van den Broeke8, Ricarda Winkelmann28,60, Harry Zekollari9,45,46,61, Chen Zhao38, Tong Zhang30,62, Thomas Zwinger63.   

Abstract

The land ice contribution to global mean sea level rise has not yet been predicted1 using ice sheet and glacier models for the latest set of socio-economic scenarios, nor using coordinated exploration of uncertainties arising from the various computer models involved. Two recent international projects generated a large suite of projections using multiple models2-8, but primarily used previous-generation scenarios9 and climate models10, and could not fully explore known uncertainties. Here we estimate probability distributions for these projections under the new scenarios11,12 using statistical emulation of the ice sheet and glacier models. We find that limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius would halve the land ice contribution to twenty-first-century sea level rise, relative to current emissions pledges. The median decreases from 25 to 13 centimetres sea level equivalent (SLE) by 2100, with glaciers responsible for half the sea level contribution. The projected Antarctic contribution does not show a clear response to the emissions scenario, owing to uncertainties in the competing processes of increasing ice loss and snowfall accumulation in a warming climate. However, under risk-averse (pessimistic) assumptions, Antarctic ice loss could be five times higher, increasing the median land ice contribution to 42 centimetres SLE under current policies and pledges, with the 95th percentile projection exceeding half a metre even under 1.5 degrees Celsius warming. This would severely limit the possibility of mitigating future coastal flooding. Given this large range (between 13 centimetres SLE using the main projections under 1.5 degrees Celsius warming and 42 centimetres SLE using risk-averse projections under current pledges), adaptation planning for twenty-first-century sea level rise must account for a factor-of-three uncertainty in the land ice contribution until climate policies and the Antarctic response are further constrained.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33953415     DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03302-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  9 in total

1.  The multi-millennial Antarctic commitment to future sea-level rise.

Authors:  N R Golledge; D E Kowalewski; T R Naish; R H Levy; C J Fogwill; E G W Gasson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Committed sea-level rise for the next century from Greenland ice sheet dynamics during the past decade.

Authors:  Stephen F Price; Antony J Payne; Ian M Howat; Benjamin E Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Antarctic ice shelf potentially stabilized by export of meltwater in surface river.

Authors:  Robin E Bell; Winnie Chu; Jonathan Kingslake; Indrani Das; Marco Tedesco; Kirsty J Tinto; Christopher J Zappa; Massimo Frezzotti; Alexandra Boghosian; Won Sang Lee
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Contribution of Antarctica to past and future sea-level rise.

Authors:  Robert M DeConto; David Pollard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project (ISMIP6) contribution to CMIP6.

Authors:  Sophie M J Nowicki; Tony Payne; Eric Larour; Helene Seroussi; Heiko Goelzer; William Lipscomb; Jonathan Gregory; Ayako Abe-Ouchi; Andrew Shepherd
Journal:  Geosci Model Dev       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 6.135

6.  Revisiting Antarctic ice loss due to marine ice-cliff instability.

Authors:  Tamsin L Edwards; Mark A Brandon; Gael Durand; Neil R Edwards; Nicholas R Golledge; Philip B Holden; Isabel J Nias; Antony J Payne; Catherine Ritz; Andreas Wernecke
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Global environmental consequences of twenty-first-century ice-sheet melt.

Authors:  Nicholas R Golledge; Elizabeth D Keller; Natalya Gomez; Kaitlin A Naughten; Jorge Bernales; Luke D Trusel; Tamsin L Edwards
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  A comparison of statistical emulation methodologies for multi-wave calibration of environmental models.

Authors:  James M Salter; Daniel Williamson
Journal:  Environmetrics       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 9.  Context for interpreting equilibrium climate sensitivity and transient climate response from the CMIP6 Earth system models.

Authors:  Gerald A Meehl; Catherine A Senior; Veronika Eyring; Gregory Flato; Jean-Francois Lamarque; Ronald J Stouffer; Karl E Taylor; Manuel Schlund
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 14.136

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Antarctic calving loss rivals ice-shelf thinning.

Authors:  Chad A Greene; Alex S Gardner; Nicole-Jeanne Schlegel; Alexander D Fraser
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 69.504

Review 2.  Response of the East Antarctic Ice Sheet to past and future climate change.

Authors:  Chris R Stokes; Nerilie J Abram; Michael J Bentley; Tamsin L Edwards; Matthew H England; Annie Foppert; Stewart S R Jamieson; Richard S Jones; Matt A King; Jan T M Lenaerts; Brooke Medley; Bertie W J Miles; Guy J G Paxman; Catherine Ritz; Tina van de Flierdt; Pippa L Whitehouse
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 69.504

3.  Wilkes subglacial basin ice sheet response to Southern Ocean warming during late Pleistocene interglacials.

Authors:  Ilaria Crotti; Aurélien Quiquet; Amaelle Landais; Barbara Stenni; David J Wilson; Mirko Severi; Robert Mulvaney; Frank Wilhelms; Carlo Barbante; Massimo Frezzotti
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 17.694

4.  Economic impacts of melting of the Antarctic Ice Sheet.

Authors:  Simon Dietz; Felix Koninx
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 17.694

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.