| Literature DB >> 33953415 |
Tamsin L Edwards1, Sophie Nowicki2,3, Ben Marzeion4,5, Regine Hock6,7, Heiko Goelzer8,9,10, Hélène Seroussi11, Nicolas C Jourdain12, Donald A Slater13,14,15, Fiona E Turner16, Christopher J Smith17,18, Christine M McKenna17, Erika Simon2, Ayako Abe-Ouchi19, Jonathan M Gregory20,21, Eric Larour11, William H Lipscomb22, Antony J Payne23, Andrew Shepherd24, Cécile Agosta25, Patrick Alexander26,27, Torsten Albrecht28, Brian Anderson29, Xylar Asay-Davis30, Andy Aschwanden6, Alice Barthel30, Andrew Bliss31, Reinhard Calov28, Christopher Chambers32, Nicolas Champollion4,12, Youngmin Choi11,33, Richard Cullather2, Joshua Cuzzone11, Christophe Dumas25, Denis Felikson2,34, Xavier Fettweis35, Koji Fujita36, Benjamin K Galton-Fenzi37,38, Rupert Gladstone39, Nicholas R Golledge29, Ralf Greve32,40, Tore Hattermann41,42, Matthew J Hoffman30, Angelika Humbert43,44, Matthias Huss45,46,47, Philippe Huybrechts48, Walter Immerzeel49, Thomas Kleiner43, Philip Kraaijenbrink49, Sébastien Le Clec'h48, Victoria Lee50, Gunter R Leguy22, Christopher M Little51, Daniel P Lowry52, Jan-Hendrik Malles4,5, Daniel F Martin53, Fabien Maussion54, Mathieu Morlighem33, James F O'Neill16, Isabel Nias2,55, Frank Pattyn9, Tyler Pelle33, Stephen F Price30, Aurélien Quiquet25, Valentina Radić56, Ronja Reese28, David R Rounce6,57, Martin Rückamp43, Akiko Sakai36, Courtney Shafer53, Nicole-Jeanne Schlegel11, Sarah Shannon23, Robin S Smith20, Fiammetta Straneo13, Sainan Sun9, Lev Tarasov58, Luke D Trusel59, Jonas Van Breedam48, Roderik van de Wal8,49, Michiel van den Broeke8, Ricarda Winkelmann28,60, Harry Zekollari9,45,46,61, Chen Zhao38, Tong Zhang30,62, Thomas Zwinger63.
Abstract
The land ice contribution to global mean sea level rise has not yet been predicted1 using ice sheet and glacier models for the latest set of socio-economic scenarios, nor using coordinated exploration of uncertainties arising from the various computer models involved. Two recent international projects generated a large suite of projections using multiple models2-8, but primarily used previous-generation scenarios9 and climate models10, and could not fully explore known uncertainties. Here we estimate probability distributions for these projections under the new scenarios11,12 using statistical emulation of the ice sheet and glacier models. We find that limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius would halve the land ice contribution to twenty-first-century sea level rise, relative to current emissions pledges. The median decreases from 25 to 13 centimetres sea level equivalent (SLE) by 2100, with glaciers responsible for half the sea level contribution. The projected Antarctic contribution does not show a clear response to the emissions scenario, owing to uncertainties in the competing processes of increasing ice loss and snowfall accumulation in a warming climate. However, under risk-averse (pessimistic) assumptions, Antarctic ice loss could be five times higher, increasing the median land ice contribution to 42 centimetres SLE under current policies and pledges, with the 95th percentile projection exceeding half a metre even under 1.5 degrees Celsius warming. This would severely limit the possibility of mitigating future coastal flooding. Given this large range (between 13 centimetres SLE using the main projections under 1.5 degrees Celsius warming and 42 centimetres SLE using risk-averse projections under current pledges), adaptation planning for twenty-first-century sea level rise must account for a factor-of-three uncertainty in the land ice contribution until climate policies and the Antarctic response are further constrained.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33953415 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03302-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nature ISSN: 0028-0836 Impact factor: 49.962