Literature DB >> 33952583

Informal caregivers and advance care planning: systematic review with qualitative meta-synthesis.

Katharina Theodora Silies1, Sascha Köpke2, Rieke Schnakenberg3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Advance care planning (ACP) is a communication process about a person's values, life goals and preferences for current and future treatment and care. It can improve end-of-life care experiences for care recipients as well as for family caregivers. Knowledge about caregivers' needs might support implementation of ACP interventions suitable to both care recipients and their caregivers.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the experiences and attitudes of informal family caregivers, and their knowledge, regarding ACP.
METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted (participants: family caregivers; intervention: advance care planning; databases: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Library). Thematic synthesis was applied to qualitative and mixed methods studies; quantitative studies were described in relation to the themes of the meta-synthesis.
RESULTS: 57 studies were included, of these 51 in the meta-synthesis. Three themes emerged: (1) caregiver's individual conceptualisation of ACP, (2) caregiver's relationships and (3) ACP process. These themes were incorporated into a longitudinal perspective on the caregiver's ACP trajectory, encompassing the phases (A) life before, (B) ACP process, (C) utilisation of ACP and (D) life after. The implications for ACP activities are described according to each phase.
CONCLUSION: For the benefit of care recipients, healthcare professionals should carefully consider caregivers' conceptualisations of ACP as well as the relationships within the family. They need to be skilled communicators, sensitive to individual needs and equipped with sufficient time resources to tailor ACP interventions to their clients' unique situation. Thus, they will support decision-making according to care recipients' wishes, caregivers' end-of-life experience and their life after bereavement. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018082492. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  communication; end of life care; ethics; family management; home care

Year:  2021        PMID: 33952583     DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care        ISSN: 2045-435X            Impact factor:   3.568


  3 in total

1.  Family caregiver inclusion is not a level playing field: toward equity for the chosen families of sexual and gender minority patients.

Authors:  William E Rosa; Smita C Banerjee; Shail Maingi
Journal:  Palliat Care Soc Pract       Date:  2022-04-19

2.  A good death from the perspective of healthcare providers from the internal medicine department in Shanghai: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Chunyan Chen; Xiaobin Lai; Wenjuan Zhao; Menglei Chen
Journal:  Int J Nurs Sci       Date:  2021-11-27

3.  Contextual factors influencing advance care planning in home care: process evaluation of the cluster-randomised controlled trial STADPLAN.

Authors:  Katharina Silies; Tilman Huckle; Rieke Schnakenberg; Änne Kirchner; Almuth Berg; Juliane Köberlein-Neu; Gabriele Meyer; Falk Hoffmann; Sascha Köpke
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 4.070

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.