| Literature DB >> 33952296 |
Nandu Goswami1, Annarita Di Mise2, Mariangela Centrone2, Annamaria Russo2, Marianna Ranieri2, Johann Reichmuth1, Bianca Brix1, Natale Gaspare De Santo3, Ferdinando Carlo Sasso3, Grazia Tamma2, Giovanna Valenti4.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33952296 PMCID: PMC8101110 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-021-02856-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Fig. 1Comparison of baseline plasma AVP in the cold and warm seasons expressed as pg/ml. Plasma vasopressin was determined using a competitive RIA kit (Vasopressin; Nichols Institute Diagnostics, San Juan Capistrano, CA, USA). a AVP was significantly higher in the warm season (April–October) as compared with the cold season (November-March) in all participants, ****p < 0.0001, n = 52. b In males, AVP was significantly higher in the warm season respect to the cold season, ****p < 0.0001, n = 24. c Similarly, in females, AVP was significantly higher in the warm season with respect to the cold season ****p < 0.0001, n = 28. Values are expressed as means ± SEM. Student’s t-test was used for the statistical analysis
Fig. 2Comparison of baseline urinary levels of aquaporin-2 (u-AQP2) in the cold (November-March) and warm seasons (April–October), expressed as protein to-urinary creatinine ratio (u-AQP2/uCre, fmol/mg). Urinary AQP2 excretion was measured in the urine samples by ELISA as previously described [10]. a u-AQP2 excretion was significantly higher in the warm season respect to the cold season in all participants, **p < 0.01, n = 52. b In males, u-AQP2 excretion was significantly higher in the warm season respect to the cold season, ****p < 0.0001, n = 24. c In females, u-AQP2 excretion was significantly higher in the warm season respect to the cold season, *p < 0.05, n = 28. Values are expressed as means ± S.E. Student’s t-test was used for the statistical analysis