| Literature DB >> 33952274 |
Pengfei Li1, Haiying Zhou2, Tian Tu1, Hui Lu3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Peritendinous adhesion is among the common complications after tendon injury. Numerous studies have been carried out to prevent its formation, including modifications of surgical procedures, postoperative cares, application of medicines, etc. This study dynamically monitored fluctuations of inflammation, state of oxidative stress, and histopathologic changes around injured tendon to provide theoretical basis for further exploration in mechanisms of peritendinous adhesion formation.Entities:
Keywords: Acute tendon injury; Dynamic exacerbation; Inflammation; Peritendinous adhesion; Reactive oxygen species; Tendon surgery
Year: 2021 PMID: 33952274 PMCID: PMC8097959 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02445-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.359
Fig. 1a Achilles tendon was carefully dissected. b The tendon was restructured using modified Kessler’s method after sharply severed
Criteria for histological evaluation of peritendinous adhesion
| Points | Features of adhesion |
|---|---|
| Quantity | |
| 0 | No apparent adhesion |
| 1 | A number of scattered filaments |
| 2 | A large number of filaments |
| 3 | Countless filaments |
| Quality | |
| 0 | No apparent adhesions |
| 1 | Regular, elongated, fine, filamentous |
| 2 | Irregular, mixed, shortened, filamentous |
| 3 | Dense, not filaments |
| Grading of adhesion | |
| 0 | None |
| 1–2 | Slight |
| 3–4 | Moderate |
| 5–6 | Severe |
Rat primers used in quantitative PCR analysis
| Gene | Primer sequence(5′-3′) |
|---|---|
| IL-1β | Sense: GGGATGATGACGACCTGCTA |
| Antisense: TGTCGTTGCTTGTCTCTCCT | |
| IL-6 | Sense: CCACTGCCTTCCCTACTTCA |
| Antisense:TTCTGACAGTGCATCATCGC | |
| SOD1 | Sense: CACTTCGAGCAGAAGGCAAG |
| Antisense:CCAACATGCCTCTCTTCATC | |
| SOD2 | Sense: CACATTAACGCGCAGATCATG |
| Antisense:CCTTAGGGCTCAGGTTTGTC | |
| COL1 | Sense: GGATCGACCCTAACCAAGGC |
| Antisense:GATCGGAACCTTCGCTTCCA | |
| HIF1A | Sense: TGCTTGGTGCTGATTTGTGA |
| Antisense: GGTCAGATGATCAGAGTCCA | |
| GAPDH | Sense:GAGCGAGATCCCGTCAAGATCAAA |
| Antisense:CACAGTCTTCTGAGTGGCAGTGAT |
Grading results of macroscopic evaluation
| Group 1 (control) | Group 2 (sham) | Group 3 (6 h after surgery) | Group 4 (24 h after surgery) | Group 5 (48 h after surgery) | Group 6 (72 h after surgery) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grading | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
Fig. 2a Respective trends of TNF-α, IL-1β, and TGF-β1 in the serum with time.
b Fluctuation of the serous content of ROS after tendon surgery ( * means P < 0.05 when compared with control or group, ***P < 0.001)
Fig. 3a Typical representation of histomorphologic findings; magnification, H&E and Masson, × 100; COL1 and COL3, × 200; bar = 200 μm. b Expression levels of diverse related genes during the process of recovery. Error bars indicated standard errors. (* means P < 0.05 when compared with control or group, **P < 0.01, ***P <0.001, ****P < 0.0001)