Literature DB >> 33951457

Explaining face representation in the primate brain using different computational models.

Le Chang1, Bernhard Egger2, Thomas Vetter3, Doris Y Tsao4.   

Abstract

Understanding how the brain represents the identity of complex objects is a central challenge of visual neuroscience. The principles governing object processing have been extensively studied in the macaque face patch system, a sub-network of inferotemporal (IT) cortex specialized for face processing. A previous study reported that single face patch neurons encode axes of a generative model called the "active appearance" model, which transforms 50D feature vectors separately representing facial shape and facial texture into facial images. However, a systematic investigation comparing this model to other computational models, especially convolutional neural network models that have shown success in explaining neural responses in the ventral visual stream, has been lacking. Here, we recorded responses of cells in the most anterior face patch anterior medial (AM) to a large set of real face images and compared a large number of models for explaining neural responses. We found that the active appearance model better explained responses than any other model except CORnet-Z, a feedforward deep neural network trained on general object classification to classify non-face images, whose performance it tied on some face image sets and exceeded on others. Surprisingly, deep neural networks trained specifically on facial identification did not explain neural responses well. A major reason is that units in the network, unlike neurons, are less modulated by face-related factors unrelated to facial identification, such as illumination.
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computational model; electrophysiology; face processing; inferotemporal cortex; neural coding; primate vision

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33951457      PMCID: PMC8566016          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.04.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.900


  20 in total

1.  Perception of shape from shading.

Authors:  V S Ramachandran
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-01-14       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Perceptual gloss parameters are encoded by population responses in the monkey inferior temporal cortex.

Authors:  Akiko Nishio; Takeaki Shimokawa; Naokazu Goda; Hidehiko Komatsu
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Performance-optimized hierarchical models predict neural responses in higher visual cortex.

Authors:  Daniel L K Yamins; Ha Hong; Charles F Cadieu; Ethan A Solomon; Darren Seibert; James J DiCarlo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Functional compartmentalization and viewpoint generalization within the macaque face-processing system.

Authors:  Winrich A Freiwald; Doris Y Tsao
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Explicit information for category-orthogonal object properties increases along the ventral stream.

Authors:  Ha Hong; Daniel L K Yamins; Najib J Majaj; James J DiCarlo
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  What makes a cell face selective? The importance of contrast.

Authors:  Shay Ohayon; Winrich A Freiwald; Doris Y Tsao
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Deep neural networks rival the representation of primate IT cortex for core visual object recognition.

Authors:  Charles F Cadieu; Ha Hong; Daniel L K Yamins; Nicolas Pinto; Diego Ardila; Ethan A Solomon; Najib J Majaj; James J DiCarlo
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Convolutional neural networks explain tuning properties of anterior, but not middle, face-processing areas in macaque inferotemporal cortex.

Authors:  Rajani Raman; Haruo Hosoya
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2020-05-08

9.  Representational similarity analysis - connecting the branches of systems neuroscience.

Authors:  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Marieke Mur; Peter Bandettini
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-24

10.  Efficient inverse graphics in biological face processing.

Authors:  Ilker Yildirim; Mario Belledonne; Winrich Freiwald; Josh Tenenbaum
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 14.136

View more
  3 in total

1.  Unsupervised deep learning identifies semantic disentanglement in single inferotemporal face patch neurons.

Authors:  Irina Higgins; Le Chang; Victoria Langston; Demis Hassabis; Christopher Summerfield; Doris Tsao; Matthew Botvinick
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 14.919

2.  Face identity coding in the deep neural network and primate brain.

Authors:  Jinge Wang; Runnan Cao; Nicholas J Brandmeir; Xin Li; Shuo Wang
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-06-20

3.  Grounding deep neural network predictions of human categorization behavior in understandable functional features: The case of face identity.

Authors:  Christoph Daube; Tian Xu; Jiayu Zhan; Andrew Webb; Robin A A Ince; Oliver G B Garrod; Philippe G Schyns
Journal:  Patterns (N Y)       Date:  2021-09-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.