BACKGROUND: Individualized hemodynamic management during surgery relies on accurate titration of vasopressors and fluids. In this context, computer systems have been developed to assist anesthesia providers in delivering these interventions. This study tested the hypothesis that computer-assisted individualized hemodynamic management could reduce intraoperative hypotension in patients undergoing intermediate- to high-risk surgery. METHODS: This single-center, parallel, two-arm, prospective randomized controlled single blinded superiority study included 38 patients undergoing abdominal or orthopedic surgery. All included patients had a radial arterial catheter inserted after anesthesia induction and connected to an uncalibrated pulse contour monitoring device. In the manually adjusted goal-directed therapy group (N = 19), the individualized hemodynamic management consisted of manual titration of norepinephrine infusion to maintain mean arterial pressure within 10% of the patient's baseline value, and mini-fluid challenges to maximize the stroke volume index. In the computer-assisted group (N = 19), the same approach was applied using a closed-loop system for norepinephrine adjustments and a decision-support system for the infusion of mini-fluid challenges (100 ml). The primary outcome was intraoperative hypotension defined as the percentage of intraoperative case time patients spent with a mean arterial pressure of less than 90% of the patient's baseline value, measured during the preoperative screening. Secondary outcome was the incidence of minor postoperative complications. RESULTS: All patients were included in the analysis. Intraoperative hypotension was 1.2% [0.4 to 2.0%] (median [25th to 75th] percentiles) in the computer-assisted group compared to 21.5% [14.5 to 31.8%] in the manually adjusted goal-directed therapy group (difference, -21.1 [95% CI, -15.9 to -27.6%]; P < 0.001). The incidence of minor postoperative complications was not different between groups (42 vs. 58%; P = 0.330). Mean stroke volume index and cardiac index were both significantly higher in the computer-assisted group than in the manually adjusted goal-directed therapy group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients having intermediate- to high-risk surgery, computer-assisted individualized hemodynamic management significantly reduces intraoperative hypotension compared to a manually controlled goal-directed approach.
BACKGROUND: Individualized hemodynamic management during surgery relies on accurate titration of vasopressors and fluids. In this context, computer systems have been developed to assist anesthesia providers in delivering these interventions. This study tested the hypothesis that computer-assisted individualized hemodynamic management could reduce intraoperative hypotension in patients undergoing intermediate- to high-risk surgery. METHODS: This single-center, parallel, two-arm, prospective randomized controlled single blinded superiority study included 38 patients undergoing abdominal or orthopedic surgery. All included patients had a radial arterial catheter inserted after anesthesia induction and connected to an uncalibrated pulse contour monitoring device. In the manually adjusted goal-directed therapy group (N = 19), the individualized hemodynamic management consisted of manual titration of norepinephrine infusion to maintain mean arterial pressure within 10% of the patient's baseline value, and mini-fluid challenges to maximize the stroke volume index. In the computer-assisted group (N = 19), the same approach was applied using a closed-loop system for norepinephrine adjustments and a decision-support system for the infusion of mini-fluid challenges (100 ml). The primary outcome was intraoperative hypotension defined as the percentage of intraoperative case time patients spent with a mean arterial pressure of less than 90% of the patient's baseline value, measured during the preoperative screening. Secondary outcome was the incidence of minor postoperative complications. RESULTS: All patients were included in the analysis. Intraoperative hypotension was 1.2% [0.4 to 2.0%] (median [25th to 75th] percentiles) in the computer-assisted group compared to 21.5% [14.5 to 31.8%] in the manually adjusted goal-directed therapy group (difference, -21.1 [95% CI, -15.9 to -27.6%]; P < 0.001). The incidence of minor postoperative complications was not different between groups (42 vs. 58%; P = 0.330). Mean stroke volume index and cardiac index were both significantly higher in the computer-assisted group than in the manually adjusted goal-directed therapy group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients having intermediate- to high-risk surgery, computer-assisted individualized hemodynamic management significantly reduces intraoperative hypotension compared to a manually controlled goal-directed approach.
Authors: Julia Y Nicklas; Oliver Diener; Maximilian Leistenschneider; Christina Sellhorn; Gerhard Schön; Martin Winkler; Guenter Daum; Edzard Schwedhelm; Julian Schröder; Margit Fisch; Barbara Schmalfeldt; Jakob R Izbicki; Michael Bauer; Sina M Coldewey; Daniel A Reuter; Bernd Saugel Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: Alexandre Joosten; Amélie Delaporte; Maxime Cannesson; Joseph Rinehart; Jean Philippe Dewilde; Luc Van Obbergh; Luc Barvais Journal: A A Case Rep Date: 2016-12-15
Authors: Alexandre Joosten; Amelie Delaporte; Brigitte Ickx; Karim Touihri; Ida Stany; Luc Barvais; Luc Van Obbergh; Patricia Loi; Joseph Rinehart; Maxime Cannesson; Philippe Van der Linden Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Alexandre Joosten; Sean Coeckelenbergh; Brenton Alexander; Maxime Cannesson; Joseph Rinehart Journal: Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med Date: 2020-04-05 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Alexandre Joosten; Joseph Rinehart; Aurélie Bardaji; Philippe Van der Linden; Vincent Jame; Luc Van Obbergh; Brenton Alexander; Maxime Cannesson; Susana Vacas; Ngai Liu; Hichem Slama; Luc Barvais Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Guy Avital; Eric J Snider; David Berard; Saul J Vega; Sofia I Hernandez Torres; Victor A Convertino; Jose Salinas; Emily N Boice Journal: J Pers Med Date: 2022-07-18