Literature DB >> 33951140

Computer-assisted Individualized Hemodynamic Management Reduces Intraoperative Hypotension in Intermediate- and High-risk Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Alexandre Joosten, Joseph Rinehart, Philippe Van der Linden, Brenton Alexander, Christophe Penna, Jacques De Montblanc, Maxime Cannesson, Jean-Louis Vincent, Eric Vicaut, Jacques Duranteau.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Individualized hemodynamic management during surgery relies on accurate titration of vasopressors and fluids. In this context, computer systems have been developed to assist anesthesia providers in delivering these interventions. This study tested the hypothesis that computer-assisted individualized hemodynamic management could reduce intraoperative hypotension in patients undergoing intermediate- to high-risk surgery.
METHODS: This single-center, parallel, two-arm, prospective randomized controlled single blinded superiority study included 38 patients undergoing abdominal or orthopedic surgery. All included patients had a radial arterial catheter inserted after anesthesia induction and connected to an uncalibrated pulse contour monitoring device. In the manually adjusted goal-directed therapy group (N = 19), the individualized hemodynamic management consisted of manual titration of norepinephrine infusion to maintain mean arterial pressure within 10% of the patient's baseline value, and mini-fluid challenges to maximize the stroke volume index. In the computer-assisted group (N = 19), the same approach was applied using a closed-loop system for norepinephrine adjustments and a decision-support system for the infusion of mini-fluid challenges (100 ml). The primary outcome was intraoperative hypotension defined as the percentage of intraoperative case time patients spent with a mean arterial pressure of less than 90% of the patient's baseline value, measured during the preoperative screening. Secondary outcome was the incidence of minor postoperative complications.
RESULTS: All patients were included in the analysis. Intraoperative hypotension was 1.2% [0.4 to 2.0%] (median [25th to 75th] percentiles) in the computer-assisted group compared to 21.5% [14.5 to 31.8%] in the manually adjusted goal-directed therapy group (difference, -21.1 [95% CI, -15.9 to -27.6%]; P < 0.001). The incidence of minor postoperative complications was not different between groups (42 vs. 58%; P = 0.330). Mean stroke volume index and cardiac index were both significantly higher in the computer-assisted group than in the manually adjusted goal-directed therapy group (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients having intermediate- to high-risk surgery, computer-assisted individualized hemodynamic management significantly reduces intraoperative hypotension compared to a manually controlled goal-directed approach.
Copyright © 2021, the American Society of Anesthesiologists. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33951140      PMCID: PMC8277754          DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   8.986


  39 in total

1.  Personalised haemodynamic management targeting baseline cardiac index in high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: a randomised single-centre clinical trial.

Authors:  Julia Y Nicklas; Oliver Diener; Maximilian Leistenschneider; Christina Sellhorn; Gerhard Schön; Martin Winkler; Guenter Daum; Edzard Schwedhelm; Julian Schröder; Margit Fisch; Barbara Schmalfeldt; Jakob R Izbicki; Michael Bauer; Sina M Coldewey; Daniel A Reuter; Bernd Saugel
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Part of the Steamroller and Not Part of the Road: Better Blood Pressure Management Through Automation.

Authors:  Alexandre Joosten; Joseph Rinehart
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Intraoperative hypotension and the risk of postoperative adverse outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  E M Wesselink; T H Kappen; H M Torn; A J C Slooter; W A van Klei
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Fully Automated Anesthesia and Fluid Management Using Multiple Physiologic Closed-Loop Systems in a Patient Undergoing High-Risk Surgery.

Authors:  Alexandre Joosten; Amélie Delaporte; Maxime Cannesson; Joseph Rinehart; Jean Philippe Dewilde; Luc Van Obbergh; Luc Barvais
Journal:  A A Case Rep       Date:  2016-12-15

5.  Does goal-directed haemodynamic and fluid therapy improve peri-operative outcomes?: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Matthew A Chong; Yongjun Wang; Nicolas M Berbenetz; Ian McConachie
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Robots Will Perform Anesthesia in the Near Future.

Authors:  Thomas M Hemmerling
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Crystalloid versus Colloid for Intraoperative Goal-directed Fluid Therapy Using a Closed-loop System: A Randomized, Double-blinded, Controlled Trial in Major Abdominal Surgery.

Authors:  Alexandre Joosten; Amelie Delaporte; Brigitte Ickx; Karim Touihri; Ida Stany; Luc Barvais; Luc Van Obbergh; Patricia Loi; Joseph Rinehart; Maxime Cannesson; Philippe Van der Linden
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Feasibility of closed-loop titration of norepinephrine infusion in patients undergoing moderate- and high-risk surgery.

Authors:  Alexandre Joosten; Brenton Alexander; Jacques Duranteau; Fabio Silvio Taccone; Jacques Creteur; Jean-Louis Vincent; Maxime Cannesson; Joseph Rinehart
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 9.166

9.  Feasibility of computer-assisted vasopressor infusion using continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring in high-risk patients undergoing renal transplant surgery.

Authors:  Alexandre Joosten; Sean Coeckelenbergh; Brenton Alexander; Maxime Cannesson; Joseph Rinehart
Journal:  Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med       Date:  2020-04-05       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  Anesthetic Management Using Multiple Closed-loop Systems and Delayed Neurocognitive Recovery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Alexandre Joosten; Joseph Rinehart; Aurélie Bardaji; Philippe Van der Linden; Vincent Jame; Luc Van Obbergh; Brenton Alexander; Maxime Cannesson; Susana Vacas; Ngai Liu; Hichem Slama; Luc Barvais
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 7.892

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Closed-Loop Controlled Fluid Administration Systems: A Comprehensive Scoping Review.

Authors:  Guy Avital; Eric J Snider; David Berard; Saul J Vega; Sofia I Hernandez Torres; Victor A Convertino; Jose Salinas; Emily N Boice
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-07-18

Review 2.  Provisional Decision-Making for Perioperative Blood Pressure Management: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Qiliang Song; Jipeng Li; Zongming Jiang
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 7.310

Review 3.  Artificial Intelligence in Critical Care Medicine.

Authors:  Joo Heung Yoon; Michael R Pinsky; Gilles Clermont
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 19.334

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.