| Literature DB >> 33951088 |
Margaret S Nardelli1, Denise C Bicudo2, Silvio C Sampaio1, Cláudia M D S Cordovil3.
Abstract
In order to access environmental conditions, the use of bioindicators that have a close relationship with environmental stressors is a largely common practice, but when evaluating environmental inferences, the individual dominant taxa need to be interpreted. Humid regions such as the marshlands are fragile ecosystems and sustainpan> communities of microalgae, often used as bioindicators, of which diatoms are a good example. Although they provide an excellent response to chemical and physical changes in water, diatom studies in surface sediments in wetlands are scarce worldwide. To determine whether diatom species have the potential to provide unambiguous inferences in the influence of environmental factors, we have evaluated diatom abundance in surface sediment, from three Pantanal lakes, against a set of environmental gradients: pH, dissolved oxygen, turbidity, conductivity, total dissolved solids, water temperature, index of trophic water status, total phosphorus and total nitrogen. The Ferradura lake presented an oligotrophic state and both Burro and Caracará lakes presented mesotrophic state. Diatoms were more abundant in the a mesotrophic conditions, but with higher species richness in the oligotrophic conditions. Depending on the N:P ratio, the nutrients nitrogen and phosphorus can also play the role of pollutants and may have negative and unpredictable effects in the environment, such as biotic homogenization. Despite the spatial variation in species, there was a greater richness of Eunotia Ehrenberg species, with the highest relative density of Eunotia formica Ehrenberg and E. pantropica Glushchenko, Kulikovskiy & Kociolek, due to the environmental acidic conditions, a determining characteristic of this genus. It was also observed that a small increase in the level of phosphorus generated an increase in the abundance of Aulacoseira Thwaites with the highest relative density of A. pusilla (Meister) Tuji & Houki and A. veraluciae Tremarin, Torgan & T.Ludwig. However, A. italica dominated in the moderately acidic environment. The results can help with decisions in impacted areas to solve socioeconomic problems, environmental management and biodiversity.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33951088 PMCID: PMC8099072 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251063
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Geographic coordinates of the sampling sites in the studied lakes.
| Ferradura lake | Burro lake | Caracará lake | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sites/zone | Lat S | Lon W | Sites/zone | Lat S | Lon W | Sites/zone | Lat S | Lon W |
| 1-inflow | 16°31’35" | 56°23’26" | 11-inflow | 17°50’24" | 57°23’53" | 21-inflow | 17°53’32" | 57°27’55" |
| 2-marginal | 16°31’33" | 56°23’25" | 12-marginal | 17°50’22" | 57°23’44" | 22-marginal | 17°53’42" | 57°27’19" |
| 3-middle | 16°31’32" | 56°23’26" | 13-marginal | 17°49’17" | 57°24’04" | 23-middle | 17°53’11" | 57°27’24" |
| 4-marginal | 16°31’25" | 56°23’30" | 14-middle | 17°49’00" | 57°23’49" | 24-middle | 17°52’31" | 57°27’29" |
| 5-middle | 16°31’23" | 56°23’31" | 15-middle | 17°48’46" | 57°23’18" | 25-marginal | 17°52’11" | 57°27’44" |
| 6-middle | 16°31’22" | 56°23’35" | 16-middle | 17°47’30" | 57°23’27" | 26-middle | 17°51’31" | 57°27’16" |
| 7-marginal | 16°31’21" | 56°23’40" | 17-middle | 17°46’40" | 57°22’54" | 27-middle | 17°51’07" | 57°27’40" |
| 8-middle | 16°31’18" | 56°23’47" | 18-middle | 17°46’15" | 57°22’39" | 28-middle | 17°50’50" | 57°27’46" |
| 9-outflow | 16°31’23" | 56°23’56" | 19-outflow | 17°46’08" | 57°22’37" | 29-outflow | 17°50’33" | 57°27’44" |
| 10-outflow | 16°31’24" | 56°23’54" | 20-outflow | 17°45’46" | 57°22’27" | 30-outflow | 17°50’29" | 57°27’53" |
Rainfall data from five months prior to collection for region the of three areas studying.
| Rainfall data | Station code | Oct/2014 | Nov/2014 | Dec/2014 | Jan/2015 | Feb/2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ferradura lake | 1656002 | 26 mm | 237 mm | 125 mm | 144 mm | 321 mm |
| Burro lake | 1655001 | 58 mm | 136 mm | 322 mm | 106 mm | 195 mm |
| Caracará lake | 1757001 | 33 mm | 99 mm | 159 mm | 62 mm | 170 mm |
Water variables in the three studied lakes.
| Site | Depth | T °C | pH | TU | DO | TDS ug.L–1 | N ug.L–1 | P ug.L–1 | Cond μS.cm–1 | Clor- | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Min | 320 | 28.2 | 5.8 | 12.1 | 27.7 | 29 | 1612.8 | 20.3 | 0.04 | -0.3 | |
| Max | 650 | 29.1 | 6.4 | 27.1 | 41.4 | 31 | 2822.4 | 36.8 | 0.05 | 2 | |
| Mean | 454 | 28.5 | 6.1 | 16.4 | 34.7 | 29.5 | 2096.6 | 26.9 | 0.05 | 0.77 | |
| SD | 111 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 4.2 | 5.3 | 0.7 | 395.1 | 5.4 | 0 | 1 | |
| CV (%) | 25 | 0.9 | 3.4 | 25.3 | 15.4 | 2.3 | 18.8 | 20 | 2.17 | 176 | |
| Min | 160 | 28.1 | 5.8 | 0 | 29.7 | 24 | 1478.4 | 16.6 | 0.04 | 0.68 | |
| Max | 380 | 29.5 | 6.7 | 47.2 | 55.4 | 32 | 2419.2 | 49.3 | 0.05 | 6.14 | |
| Mean | 216 | 28.5 | 6.2 | 21.8 | 41.2 | 28.8 | 1827.8 | 31.5 | 0.04 | 0.78 | |
| SD | 59 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 15.3 | 7.5 | 2.9 | 276.7 | 8.3 | 0 | 1.82 | |
| CV (%) | 27 | 1.4 | 4.4 | 70.3 | 18.2 | 10.2 | 15.1 | 26.4 | 9.86 | 231.74 | |
| Min | 120 | 29.2 | 5.9 | 5.5 | 48.6 | 23 | 1478.4 | 13 | 0.04 | 0.34 | |
| Max | 270 | 30.2 | 6.8 | 61.6 | 93.3 | 38 | 2688 | 41.9 | 0.06 | 3.41 | |
| Mean | 194 | 29.6 | 6.4 | 38.6 | 62.7 | 28.1 | 1948.8 | 23.9 | 0.04 | 0.51 | |
| SD | 48 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 13.4 | 13 | 4.8 | 442.7 | 10.2 | 0.01 | 1.05 | |
| CV (%) | 25 | 0.9 | 4.7 | 34.7 | 20.7 | 17 | 22.7 | 42.7 | 17.14 | 204.94 |
Ferradura lake (FP), Burro lake (BP) and Caracará lake (CP). Minimum value (Min), maximum value (Max), mean value (Mean), standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV%).
bDepth collect (cm); water temperature (T °C); turbidity (TU); dissolved oxygen (DO %); total dissolved solids (TDS ug.L–1); total nitrogen (N μg.L–1); total phosphorus (P μg.L–1); electrical conductivity (Cond μS.cm–1); chlorophyll-a (Clor-a ug.L–1).
Correlation coefficients (Pearson) between abiotic variables.
| Variables | Depth | T °C | pH | TU | DO% | TN μg.L–1 | TP μg.L–1 | TSI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Depth cm | -0.32 | 0.2 | 0 | |||||
| T °C | -0.03 | -0.3 | 0.08 | |||||
| pH | -0.02 | -0.24 | 0.27 | |||||
| TU | -0.32 | -0.03 | -0.1 | 0.24 | ||||
| DO% | -0.2 | 0.21 | ||||||
| N μg.L–1 | 0.2 | -0.03 | -0.02 | -0.03 | -0.2 | 0.23 | -0.2 | |
| P μg.L–1 | 0 | -0.3 | -0.24 | -0.1 | 0.23 | |||
| TSI | 0.08 | 0.27 | 0.24 | 0.21 | -0.2 |
aDepth collect (cm); water temperature (T °C); turbidity (TU); dissolved oxygen (DO %); total nitrogen (TN μg.L–1); total phosphorus (TP μg.L–1); trophic status index (TSI).
bCorrelations in bold are significant at p <0.05 N = 30.
Fig 1Principal Component Analysis (PCA) with 8 abiotic variables that presented correlation and 30 sites of the lakes.
Depth collects; water temperature (T °C); hydrogenation potential (pH); Dissolved oxygen (DO%); Total Nitrogen for water (TN); Total phosphorus for water (TP) and Trophic State Index (TSI), Ferradura (FP) Burro (BP) and Caracará (CP).
Fig 2Trophic level, classification of the Cetesb in relation to the Trophic Status Index (TSI).
Ferradura lake (FP) oligotrophic (47≤ TSI ≤ 52) minimum trophic level, Burro lake (BP) and Caracará lake (CP), both mesotrophic (52 ≤ TSI ≤ 59), medium trophic level.
Codes and denomination of species with more than 5% abundance in the samples collected from the three lakes under study.
| Code | Denomination of the Species | FP | BP | CP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AEXG | x | x | ||
| AAMB | x | x | x | |
| AUGR | x | x | x | |
| AUIT | x | x | x | |
| AUPU | x | |||
| ASIM | x | |||
| AUMI | x | |||
| AUVE | x | x | x | |
| ECUT | x | x | x | |
| EDID | x | x | x | |
| EDMG | x | x | ||
| EFOR | x | x | x | |
| ELGC | x | x | x | |
| EMET | x | x | x | |
| EMON | x | x | x | |
| EFLX | x | |||
| EPAP | x | x | ||
| EGUI | x | x | x | |
| EPAN | x | x | x | |
| ETRA | x | x | x | |
| FBRA | x | x | x | |
| PSYM | x | x | x | |
| SLCR | x | x | ||
| SLDB | x | |||
| SGOU | x | x |
aPresence (x) and absence (-) of species in the lakes: Ferradura Lake (FP), Burro Lake (BP) and Caracará Lake (CP).
Correlation coefficients between abiotic and biotic variables.
| Sites | FP | BP | CP | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AEXG | 0.5 | 0 | 0.1 | 300 | 15 | 1.8 | 4.4 | 247 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| AAMB | 0.2 | 0 | 0.1 | 300 | 12.4 | 3.5 | 3.8 | 110 | 3.3 | 0.4 | 1 | 277.1 |
| AUGR | 4 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 128.8 | 11.2 | 4.3 | 3 | 70.4 | 3.3 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 88.1 |
| AUIT | 49.6 | 39.8 | 7.8 | 19.7 | 15 | 4.8 | 4.5 | 93.4 | 11.8 | 4.5 | 3.1 | 69.7 |
| AUMI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.8 | 1.4 | 2.4 | 174.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| AUPU | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 44 | 6.1 | 12.9 | 211.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ASIM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.3 | 1.5 | 1.9 | 132 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| AUVE | 5.5 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 208.6 | 40.2 | 19.1 | 13.3 | 69.7 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 38.2 |
| ELGC | 7 | 3.4 | 2.3 | 68 | 6 | 2.6 | 1.9 | 74.3 | 10 | 3.7 | 2.8 | 75.6 |
| ECUT | 6.5 | 1 | 1.9 | 185.3 | 4 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 165.8 | 22.5 | 5.4 | 6.6 | 122.1 |
| EDID | 5 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 107.5 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 201.5 | 2.5 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 89.8 |
| EDMG | 3.5 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 235.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 19.7 | 10.5 | 53.3 |
| EFOR | 23.4 | 11.7 | 7.8 | 66.6 | 33 | 11.6 | 10 | 86.4 | 11.5 | 6.9 | 3.3 | 47.6 |
| EMET | 15 | 7.7 | 4.6 | 59.8 | 5 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 114.5 | 8 | 2.5 | 2.7 | 107.3 |
| EMON | 13.3 | 5.3 | 3.9 | 73.2 | 4 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 104.6 | 14.5 | 4.7 | 3.8 | 80.7 |
| EFLX | 5 | 1 | 1.7 | 178.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| EPAP | 2 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 200 | 6 | 1.6 | 2.2 | 140.9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| EGUI | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 152.8 | 9 | 0.9 | 2.7 | 300 | 1.8 | 1 | 0.7 | 69.2 |
| EPAN | 18.5 | 7.1 | 5.1 | 71 | 22.6 | 7.2 | 7.2 | 99.6 | 30.7 | 20.6 | 6.4 | 31.2 |
| ETRA | 2 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 300 | 44.3 | 9 | 13.2 | 146 | 6 | 1.5 | 2 | 139.1 |
| FBRA | 1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 300 | 12.4 | 1.5 | 3.6 | 236.2 | 7 | 1.4 | 2 | 148.8 |
| PSYM | 1 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 137.8 | 6 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 240.8 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 152.8 |
| SLCR | 2 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 160.6 | 17 | 2.2 | 5 | 227.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| SLDB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17.5 | 2.7 | 5.4 | 196.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| SGOU | 0.3 | 0 | 0.1 | 300 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.5 | 2 | 2 | 100.3 |
aBiotic variables: Species codes are described in Table 5.
bValues of maximum, mean density of species (cells.mL-1), standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV %), of the 25 most abundant species (> 5%) for the three lakes under study: Ferradura Lake (FP), Burro Lake (BP) and Caracará Lake (CP).
Fig 3Illustration of the abundant species (> 5%) for the three lakes.
AEXG: Achnanthes exiguum; AAMB: Aulacoseira ambigua; AUGR: A. granulata; AUIT: A. italica; AUPU: A. pusilla; ASIM: A. simoniae; AUMI: A.minuscula; AUVE: A. veraluciae; ECUT: E. curtiraphe; EDID: E. didyma; EDMG: E. desmogonioides; EFOR: E. formica; ELGC: Eunotia longicamelus; EMET: E. metamonodon; EMON: E. monodon; EFLX: E. flexuosa; EPAP: E. papilio; EGUI: E. guianense; EPAN: E. pantropica; ETRA: E. transfuga; FBRA: Fragilariforma brasiliensis; PSYM: Placoneis symmetrica; SLCR: Staurosirella crassa; SLDB: S. dubia; SGOU: Synedra goulardii.
Correlation coefficients (Pearson) between biotic variables.
| b | AEXG | AAMB | AUGR | AUIT | AUMI | AUPU | ASIM | AUVE | ECUT | EDMG | EMET | EMON | EFLX | EPAP | EPAN | ETRA | FBRA | PSYM | SLCR | SLDB | SGOU |
| AEXG | 0.11 | 0.05 | -0.17 | 0 | -0.05 | 0.07 | 0.09 | -0.12 | -0.14 | -0.13 | -0.13 | -0.06 | -0.01 | -0.26 | -0.05 | 0.05 | 0.2 | -0.1 | |||
| AAMB | 0.11 | -0.36 | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.22 | -0.2 | -0.25 | -0.24 | -0.3 | -0.14 | 0.13 | -0.18 | 0.19 | -0.1 | 0.07 | 0.07 | -0.17 | ||||
| AUGR | 0.05 | 0.35 | 0.34 | -0.22 | -0.35 | -0.3 | -0.23 | -0.23 | 0.23 | -0.31 | 0.2 | 0.23 | 0 | 0.14 | -0.13 | ||||||
| AUIT | -0.17 | -0.36 | -0.17 | -0.15 | -0.24 | -0.19 | 0.23 | -0.1 | -0.33 | -0.28 | -0.3 | -0.08 | -0.1 | -0.21 | -0.32 | ||||||
| AUMI | 0 | 0.13 | 0.35 | -0.17 | 0.24 | -0.11 | -0.18 | -0.09 | -0.26 | -0.09 | 0.22 | -0.29 | 0.03 | -0.07 | -0.06 | -0.02 | 0 | -0.14 | |||
| AUPU | -0.05 | 0.11 | 0.34 | -0.15 | 0.16 | -0.11 | -0.16 | -0.09 | -0.23 | -0.07 | 0.03 | -0.27 | 0.03 | -0.06 | -0.08 | -0.07 | -0.05 | -0.12 | |||
| ASIM | 0.07 | 0.22 | -0.24 | 0.31 | -0.16 | -0.23 | -0.18 | -0.31 | -0.11 | 0.09 | -0.31 | 0.17 | -0.06 | 0 | 0.06 | 0.1 | -0.17 | ||||
| AUVE | 0.09 | 0.24 | 0.16 | 0.31 | -0.22 | -0.32 | -0.34 | -0.18 | -0.25 | 0.24 | 0.33 | 0.24 | 0.04 | 0.21 | -0.23 | ||||||
| ECUT | -0.12 | -0.2 | -0.22 | -0.19 | -0.11 | -0.11 | -0.16 | -0.22 | -0.11 | 0.06 | -0.15 | -0.14 | 0.35 | -0.12 | -0.16 | -0.18 | -0.13 | -0.14 | 0.08 | ||
| EDMG | -0.14 | -0.25 | -0.35 | -0.18 | -0.16 | -0.23 | -0.32 | -0.23 | -0.02 | -0.18 | -0.26 | -0.21 | -0.06 | -0.18 | -0.18 | -0.17 | 0.35 | ||||
| EMET | -0.13 | -0.24 | -0.3 | -0.09 | -0.09 | -0.18 | -0.34 | -0.11 | -0.23 | 0.3 | -0.09 | -0.29 | -0.31 | -0.24 | -0.08 | -0.04 | -0.18 | -0.18 | |||
| EMON | -0.13 | -0.3 | -0.23 | 0.23 | -0.26 | -0.23 | -0.31 | 0.06 | -0.02 | 0.3 | -0.27 | -0.05 | -0.11 | 0.21 | -0.13 | -0.17 | -0.19 | ||||
| EFLX | -0.06 | -0.14 | -0.23 | -0.09 | -0.07 | -0.11 | -0.18 | -0.15 | -0.18 | -0.11 | -0.03 | -0.1 | -0.07 | -0.12 | -0.08 | -0.08 | -0.13 | ||||
| EPAP | -0.01 | 0.13 | 0.23 | -0.1 | 0.22 | 0.03 | 0.09 | -0.14 | -0.26 | -0.09 | -0.27 | -0.11 | -0.06 | 0.01 | -0.08 | 0.16 | -0.01 | 0.08 | -0.2 | ||
| EPAN | -0.26 | -0.18 | -0.31 | -0.33 | -0.29 | -0.27 | -0.31 | -0.25 | 0.35 | -0.29 | -0.05 | -0.03 | -0.06 | 0.03 | -0.13 | -0.31 | -0.29 | -0.32 | |||
| ETRA | -0.05 | 0.19 | -0.28 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.17 | 0.24 | -0.12 | -0.21 | -0.31 | -0.11 | -0.1 | 0.01 | 0.03 | -0.06 | 0.1 | -0.07 | 0.01 | -0.1 | ||
| FBRA | 0.05 | 0.2 | -0.3 | -0.07 | -0.06 | -0.06 | 0.33 | -0.16 | -0.06 | -0.24 | 0.21 | -0.07 | -0.08 | -0.13 | -0.06 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.19 | ||
| PSYM | 0.2 | -0.1 | 0.23 | -0.08 | -0.06 | -0.08 | 0 | 0.24 | -0.18 | -0.18 | -0.08 | -0.13 | -0.12 | 0.16 | -0.31 | 0.1 | 0.02 | 0.2 | -0.04 | ||
| SLCR | 0.07 | 0 | -0.1 | -0.02 | -0.07 | 0.06 | 0.04 | -0.13 | -0.18 | -0.04 | -0.17 | -0.08 | -0.01 | -0.29 | -0.07 | 0.01 | 0.2 | -0.13 | |||
| SLDB | 0.07 | 0.14 | -0.21 | 0 | -0.05 | 0.1 | 0.21 | -0.14 | -0.17 | -0.18 | -0.19 | -0.08 | 0.08 | -0.32 | 0.01 | 0.02 | -0.12 | ||||
| SGOU | -0.1 | -0.17 | -0.13 | -0.32 | -0.14 | -0.12 | -0.17 | -0.23 | 0.08 | 0.35 | -0.18 | -0.13 | -0.2 | -0.1 | 0.19 | -0.04 | -0.13 | -0.12 |
aCorrelations in bold are significant at p <0.05.
bBiotic variables: Species codes are described in Table 5.
Fig 4Principal Component Analysis (PCA) with 21 biotic variables, and 30 sites of the lakes: Ferradura (FP) Burro (BP) and Caracará (CP).
Correlation coefficients (Pearson) between biotic and abiotic variables.
| Variables | Depth cm | T °C | pH | D0% | TN μg.L–1 | TP μg.L–1 | TSI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAMB | -0.26 | -0.358 | -0.027 | -0.066 | -0.163 | 0.159 | |
| AUGR | -0.253 | 0.14 | -0.006 | -0.116 | 0.161 | ||
| AUIT | 0.226 | 0.047 | |||||
| AUVE | -0.308 | -0.328 | 0.074 | -0.068 | -0.297 | 0.222 | |
| ELGC | 0.049 | 0.021 | -0.146 | -0.021 | 0.325 | -0.002 | |
| EDID | 0.296 | 0.071 | -0.045 | 0.025 | -0.059 | -0.328 | |
| EDMG | -0.309 | -0.207 | -0.359 | 0.063 | |||
| EMET | -0.234 | -0.313 | -0.345 | 0.149 | -0.168 | ||
| EMON | 0.237 | 0.152 | -0.189 | 0.229 | 0.003 | -0.069 | |
| EFLX | -0.207 | -0.301 | -0.155 | -0.094 | 0.014 | ||
| EPAP | -0.071 | -0.268 | -0.286 | -0.238 | -0.254 | 0.312 | |
| EPAN | -0.257 | 0.241 | -0.073 | -0.068 | 0.124 | ||
| ETRA | -0.282 | -0.13 | 0.174 | -0.031 | 0.05 | ||
| SGOU | -0.344 | -0.044 | -0.119 | -0.198 | 0.064 |
aCorrelations in bold are significant at p <0.05.
bBiotic variables: Species codes are described in Table 5.
cAbiotic variables: Depth (cm); water temperature (T°C); hydrogenation potential (pH); dissolved oxygen (DO%); total nitrogen for water (TN); total phosphorus for water (TP); and level of trophic status index (TSI).
Fig 5Ordination for CCA with 14 species (Table 8), 07 abiotic variables and 30 sites of the three lakes.
Depth; water temperature (T °C); hydrogenation potential (pH); dissolved oxygen (DO%); total nitrogen (TN); total phosphorus (TP); trophic state index (TSI), Ferradura (FP) Burro (BP) and Caracará (CP).