Literature DB >> 33950465

Patient-caregiver agreement and test-retest reliability of the EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-Y-5L in paediatric patients with haematological malignancies.

Wenjing Zhou1,2, Anle Shen3, Zhihao Yang4, Pei Wang5, Bin Wu6, Michael Herdman7, Nan Luo8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2019, the EuroQol Group developed a 'beta' 5-level version of EQ-5D-Y (Y-5L) by increasing the number of descriptive levels to five for each health dimension, as compared to the standard 3-level EQ-5D-Y (Y-3L).
OBJECTIVE: To assess patient-caregiver agreement and test-retest reliability of the Y-5L and Y-3L in paediatric patients with haematological malignancies.
METHODS: Paediatric inpatients aged 8-17 years were interviewed with the Y-5L and Y-3L questionnaires twice, while their caregivers were interviewed at the same time using the proxy versions of the questionnaires. Patient-caregiver agreement and test-retest reliability were assessed using Gwet's agreement coefficient (Gwet's AC1) for EQ-5D dimensions and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the EQ VAS.
RESULTS: Ninety-six patient-caregiver dyads participated in the study. Patient-caregiver agreement on the EQ-5D-Y descriptive system was moderate to good for both the Y-3L and Y-5L, but poor on the EQ VAS. Test-retest reliability of the descriptive system was good to very good for the Y-3L and moderate to good for the Y-5L in children, and fair to good for both versions of EQ-5D-Y in proxies. The EQ VAS showed good test-retest reliability in both children and caregivers. In a subgroup analysis of results in younger patients aged 8-10 years, patient-caregiver agreement and test-retest reliability were also observed to range from moderate to very good.
CONCLUSION: Both the Y-3L and Y-5L descriptive systems showed acceptable patient-caregiver agreement and test-retest reliability when used to assess the HRQoL of children and adolescents with haematological malignancies, including in younger patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EQ-5D-Y; Haematological malignancies; Proxy; Reliability

Year:  2021        PMID: 33950465     DOI: 10.1007/s10198-021-01309-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Health Econ        ISSN: 1618-7598


  1 in total

1.  Parent-child discrepancy in the assessment of health- related quality of life using the EQ-5D-Y questionnaire.

Authors:  Miguel Á Perez Sousa; Pedro R Olivares Sánchez-Toledo; Narcis Gusi Fuerte
Journal:  Arch Argent Pediatr       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 0.635

  1 in total
  5 in total

1.  Psychometric performance of proxy-reported EQ-5D youth version 5-level (EQ-5D-Y-5L) in comparison with three-level (EQ-5D-Y-3L) in children and adolescents with scoliosis.

Authors:  Jiaer Lin; Carlos King Ho Wong; Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Prudence Wing Hang Cheung; Nan Luo
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2022-02-04

2.  EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-Y-5L proxy report: psychometric performance and agreement with self-report.

Authors:  Titi Sahidah Fitriana; Fredrick Dermawan Purba; Elly Stolk; Jan J V Busschbach
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 3.077

3.  Non-disease specific patient-reported outcome measures of health-related quality of life in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review of current research and practice.

Authors:  Justyna Młyńczyk; Paweł Abramowicz; Maciej K Stawicki; Jerzy Konstantynowicz
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 2.631

4.  Measurement properties and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-Y-5L compared to the EQ-5D-Y-3L in children and adolescents receiving acute orthopaedic care.

Authors:  Janine Verstraete; Zara Marthinus; Stewart Dix-Peek; Des Scott
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 3.186

5.  Are We Agreed? Self- Versus Proxy-Reporting of Paediatric Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Using Generic Preference-Based Measures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Diana Khanna; Jyoti Khadka; Christine Mpundu-Kaambwa; Kiri Lay; Remo Russo; Julie Ratcliffe
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 4.558

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.