Literature DB >> 33950317

The role of sex genotype in paediatric CNS tumour incidence and survival.

Wai Cheong Soon1, Edward Goacher2, Sandeep Solanki3, Josie Hayes4, Melpo Kapetanstrataki5, Susan Picton6, Paul Dominic Chumas7, Ryan Koshy Mathew8,9.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Evidence exists, in CNS germinomas and medulloblastomas (MB), that patient sex significantly influences incidence and outcome. The role of sex genotype in other paediatric CNS tumours remains unclear. This study sought to examine the role of sex genotype in CNS tumour incidence and overall survival (OS).
METHODS: Age-adjusted incidence and OS rates were collected from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Result (SEER) registry between 2000 and 2011 for common paediatric (<=19 years) CNS tumours: pilocytic astrocytoma (PA), anaplastic astrocytoma, glioblastoma (GBM), medulloblastoma, supratentorial CNS embryonal tumour, ependymoma, and germinoma. All patients with histologically confirmed, ICD-03 coded, first tumours, were included. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to calculate hazard ratios (HR).
RESULTS: The total cases are as follows: males=3018 and females=2276. Highest incidence was seen in PA (n=2103). GBM displayed the worst OS, whilst PA displayed the best. Higher incidence was observed in males for all tumours, except PA. Females with ependymoma had significantly better OS compared to males, whereas males with germinomas had better OS compared to females. Females <1 year with AA had better OS than males. Increasing age significantly improved male and female survival in ependymoma and medulloblastoma.
CONCLUSION: Interrogating population-based registries such as SEER minimises bias and provides credible data. Observed differences in incidence and OS between the sexes for different paediatric CNS tumours provide useful prognostic information for clinicians. Sex genotype was a significant independent prognostic factor in ependymomas and germinomas. Further investigation of possible epigenetic and hormonal differences may provide sex-specific vulnerabilities that may be exploitable for targeted therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Incidence; Paediatric; Sex; Survival; Tumour

Year:  2021        PMID: 33950317     DOI: 10.1007/s00381-021-05165-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst        ISSN: 0256-7040            Impact factor:   1.475


  43 in total

1.  Gender differences in facial expression recognition in survivors of pediatric brain tumors.

Authors:  Victoria W Willard; Kristina K Hardy; Melanie J Bonner
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Influence of a child's sex on medulloblastoma outcome.

Authors:  M D Weil; K Lamborn; M S Edwards; W M Wara
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-05-13       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Central nervous system tumours in children: epidemiology and risk factors.

Authors:  Patricia A McKinney
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.010

4.  Sex ratio among childhood cancers by single year of age.

Authors:  Lindsay A Williams; Michaela Richardson; Erin L Marcotte; Jenny N Poynter; Logan G Spector
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 5.  Epidemiology of childhood cancer.

Authors:  Peter Kaatsch
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 12.111

6.  The relationship of sex and treatment modality to neuropsychologic outcome in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  D P Waber; N J Tarbell; C M Kahn; R D Gelber; S E Sallan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Cognitive functioning of pediatric patients with brain tumor: an investigation of the role of gender.

Authors:  Claudia Corti; Valentina Manfredi; Maura Massimino; Alessandra Bardoni; Renato Borgatti; Geraldina Poggi
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 1.475

8.  Primary CNS germ cell tumors in Japan and the United States: an analysis of 4 tumor registries.

Authors:  Bridget J McCarthy; Soichiro Shibui; Takamasa Kayama; Etsuo Miyaoka; Yoshitaka Narita; Michiko Murakami; Ayako Matsuda; Tomohiro Matsuda; Tomotaka Sobue; Bryan E Palis; Therese A Dolecek; Carol Kruchko; Herbert H Engelhard; J Lee Villano
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 12.300

9.  Medulloblastoma in adults.

Authors:  M D Prados; R E Warnick; W M Wara; D A Larson; K Lamborn; C B Wilson
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1995-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Medulloblastoma: A common pediatric tumor: Prognostic factors and predictors of outcome.

Authors:  Lachi Pavan Kumar; Syed Fayaz Ahmed J Deepa; I Moinca; P Suresh; K V J R Naidu
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Pineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation: a systematic review and contemporary management of 389 cases reported during the last two decades.

Authors:  Hajime Takase; Reo Tanoshima; Navneet Singla; Yoshihiko Nakamura; Tetsuya Yamamoto
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Risk Factors for Survival in Patients With Medulloblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yu Liu; Bo Xiao; Sen Li; Jiangang Liu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Prognostic Factors and Histopathological Features of Pediatric Intracranial Ependymomas: Nationwide Brain Tumor Registry-based Study of Japan.

Authors:  Takahiro Sasaki; Yuji Uematsu; Junya Fukai; Shota Tanaka; Akitake Mukasa; Nobuhito Saito; Yoshitaka Narita; Naoyuki Nakao
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 2.036

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.