| Literature DB >> 33950261 |
Alexander S T Papadopulos1,2, Andrew J Helmstetter2,3, Owen G Osborne1, Aaron A Comeault1, Daniel P Wood1, Edward A Straw2,4, Laurence Mason2, Michael F Fay2,5, Joe Parker2,6, Luke T Dunning7, Andrew D Foote1,8, Rhian J Smith2, Jackie Lighten9.
Abstract
The impact of human-mediated environmental change on the evolutionary trajectories of wild organisms is poorly understood. In particular, capacity of species to adapt rapidly (in hundreds of generations or less), reproducibly and predictably to extreme environmental change is unclear. Silene uniflora is predominantly a coastal species, but it has also colonized isolated, disused mines with phytotoxic, zinc-contaminated soils. To test whether rapid, parallel adaptation to anthropogenic pollution has taken place, we used reduced representation sequencing (ddRAD) to reconstruct the evolutionary history of geographically proximate mine and coastal population pairs and found largely independent colonization of mines from different coastal sites. Furthermore, our results show that parallel evolution of zinc tolerance has occurred without gene flow spreading adaptive alleles between mine populations. In genomic regions where signatures of selection were detected across multiple mine-coast pairs, we identified genes with functions linked to physiological differences between the putative ecotypes, although genetic differentiation at specific loci is only partially shared between mine populations. Our results are consistent with a complex, polygenic genetic architecture underpinning rapid adaptation. This shows that even under a scenario of strong selection and rapid adaptation, evolutionary responses to human activities (and other environmental challenges) may be idiosyncratic at the genetic level and, therefore, difficult to predict from genomic data.Entities:
Keywords: heavy metal tolerance; parallel evolution; rapid evolution
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33950261 PMCID: PMC8382892 DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msab141
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Biol Evol ISSN: 0737-4038 Impact factor: 16.240
Fig. 1.Differential heavy metal tolerance between local mine and coastal populations. (A) Map of population sampling locations. Fill colors denote habitat type (mine—orange, coastal—blue). Outline colors denote local populations (West Wales—WWA; South Wales—SWA; South-West England—ENG; South-West Ireland—IRE). The same color scheme is used throughout. (B) Zinc and (C) copper tolerance for each mine-coast pair (center line, median; box limits, upper and lower quartiles; whiskers, 1.5× interquartile range; points, outliers; zinc treatment left to right n = 15/17/14/14/14/16/15/19; copper treatment left to right n = 17/17/16/17/15/18/16/18). Local mine and coastal populations have significantly different zinc tolerance, but only the Irish pair have significantly different copper tolerance.
Fig. 2.Isolation by distance (IBD) patterns arising from multiple or single origins of mine populations. (A) Under a simulated multiple independent origin model, the correlation between FST and migration between mine populations (orange) is steeper (i.e., IBD is stronger) and has a higher intercept than isolation by distance between coastal populations (blue). (B) In contrast, under a single origin model, the relationship between genetic differentiation and geography breaks down between mine populations—the slope is not significantly different from zero and the intercept is lower than between coastal populations (center line, median; box limits, upper and lower quartiles; whiskers, 1.5× interquartile range; points, outliers). (C) The observed IBD relationships in Silene uniflora conform to the patterns expected from multiple origins of the mine populations. IBD between mine and coastal populations in green.
Fig. 3.Evidence for three independent origins of zinc-tolerant populations in S. uniflora. (A) Phylogenetic reconstruction (mine populations in orange and coastal populations in blue). Nodes with greater than 90% bootstrap support are denoted by black circles. (B) PCA points to three, well-supported, independent origins of zinc-tolerant populations. Variance explained by PC1 = 12.3% and PC2 = 9.0%. Points are colored by region as figure 1. All points from a specific population are surrounded by a single ellipse which is colored by habitat type (mine—orange, coast—blue). (C) Treemix analysis with four migration edges. Points are colored as in figure. 1. The topology is almost identical to that produced by the SNPhylo analysis—the relationship of ENG-C and SWA-C to ENG-M is reversed. Color scale indicates migration edge weight. Only migration between coastal populations was supported by f4 statistics (see fig. 4).
Fig. 4.Evidence for admixture between coastal populations but not between mines. z-scores of f4 statistics for the six different permutations of four taxon trees (Types 1–6), with all of the different combinations of mine (orange) and coastal (blue) populations based on relationships in figure 3. The red line denotes the z-score at which the f4 statistic is significantly different from zero at the 5% level after Dunn–Bonferroni correction for multiple tests (z = 3.67). There is evidence of admixture in the four coast tree (Type 1; z = 5.23) and three coast: one mine trees (Type 3; z > 3.67 for three of the quartets), which is also reflected in the four Type 5 quartets with z-scores exceeding 3.67. On the other hand, the four mine (Type 2; z = 0.17) and three mine: one coast trees (Type 4; z = 0.14–2.35) demonstrate that there has not been introgression between mine sites.
Fig. 5.Molecular convergence and divergence across regional mine-coast pairs. Upset plots of the shared (A) outlier scaffolds and (B) individual SNPs across the four regional mine-coast pairs. Filled points below bars denote which regional sets are intersected for each bar (e.g., the leftmost bar in each plot represents the set including all four mine-coast comparisons). Inset scatterplots show observed overlap (y-axis) versus expected overlap (x-axis) across combinations of regional sets, with line at 1:1. Black bars denote outliers found in a single geographic region. The remaining bars are colored by super exact test P value (all < 0.001) with darker green denoting smaller P values and purple denoting extremely small values (<10−150).