Literature DB >> 33949886

Gene transcription changes in a locust model of noise-induced deafness.

Andrew S French1, Ben Warren2.   

Abstract

Locusts have auditory structures called Müller's organs attached to tympanic membranes on either side of the abdomen. We measured the normalized abundances of 500 different mRNA transcripts in 320 Müller's organs obtained from 160 locusts (Schistocerca gregaria) that had been subjected to a loud continuous 3-kHz tone for 24 h. Abundance ratios were then measured relative to transcripts from 360 control organs. A histogram of the number of observed transcripts versus their abundance ratios (noise exposed/control) was well fitted by a Cauchy distribution with median value near one. Transcripts below 5% and above 95% of the cumulative distribution function of the fitted Cauchy distribution were selected as putatively different from the expected values of an untreated preparation. This yielded eight transcripts with ratios increased by noise exposure (ratios 1.689-3.038) and 18 transcripts with reduced ratios (0.069-0.457). Most of the transcripts with increased abundance represented genes responsible for cuticular construction, suggesting extensive remodeling of some or all the cuticular components of the auditory structure, whereas the reduced abundance transcripts were mostly involved in lipid and protein storage and metabolism, suggesting a profound reduction in metabolic activity in response to the overstimulation.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Locust ears have functional and genetic similarities to human ears, including loss of hearing from age or noise exposure. We measured transcript abundances in transcriptomes of noise-exposed and control locust ears. The data indicate remodeling of the ear tympanum and profound reductions in metabolism that may explain reduced sound transduction. These findings advance our understanding of this useful model and suggest further experiments to elucidate mechanisms that ears use to cope with excessive stimulation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory neurons; hearing; mechanotransduction; noise-induced hearing loss

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33949886      PMCID: PMC8285658          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00119.2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


INTRODUCTION

About 1.5 billion people globally have compromised hearing (World Health Organization, http://www.who.int/) due to a range of causes, including genetic defects, infectious diseases, loud noise exposure, and aging. Experimental noise exposure has provided important models of deafness in mammals (1), and this has recently been extended to insect auditory systems (2, 3). Despite obvious differences, insects have evolved organs of hearing that deal with the same problems in converting the small pressure differences of sound into receptor currents in sensory neurons (4). Important similarities with vertebrates are the use of ciliated sensory neurons that use mechanical feedback to amplify small displacements (5, 6) and the presence of many homologous genes in the development and physiology of the hearing structures (7). Insects can provide experimental advantages because of their relatively simple anatomy, ease of breeding, rapid development, and reduced costs. Insects have also provided useful models of aging, including loss of hearing with age (7, 8), with the additional advantage of a short lifespan. Audition, like all mechanoreception, can be considered as a three-stage process (9). First, the external stimulus (sound) is mechanically coupled to a sensory structure; second, the mechanical signal is transduced to cause an electrical receptor current; third the receptor current is encoded in action potentials for distance transmission. Deafness could involve malfunction at any of the three stages. Changes in mechanical properties and reductions in transduced receptor potentials have been seen in aged (7) and noise-exposed (2, 3) insects, but the causes of these changes remain enigmatic. A range of ion channel families have been implicated in sensory mechanotransduction, including audition. These comprise Piezo proteins (10), transient receptor potential (TRP) channels (11, 12), degenerin/epithelial sodium channel/acid sensing ion channel (DEG/EnaC/ASIC) families (13), and transmembrane channel-like (TMC) proteins (14). Insect audition is performed by chordotonal organs (15), and three types of TRP channel genes have been linked to chordotonal mechanically activated ion currents: NompC (16), Nanchung, and Inactive (17, 18). However, all the above families must be considered when searching for changes in auditory function. Many arthropod mechanoreceptors, including chordotonal sensilla, rely on transepithelial gradients of ionic concentrations and voltages to drive the receptor current through mechanically activated ion channels (19). The detailed arrangement of ionic pumps, exchangers, and channels that produce these gradients are not completely understood in any insect tissue (20), but changes in these components could clearly reduce the receptor current and sound detection. Desert locusts, Schistocerca gregaria, have paired abdominal auditory organs, each consisting of an external tympanum with a sensory structure called Müller’s organ attached internally (21–23). We found previously that 24-h noise exposure produced hearing loss characterized by both mechanical and electrophysiological changes in the locust system (3). Here, we compared the abundances of 500 different mRNA transcripts from Müller’s organs in noise-exposed versus control locusts, in attempts to identify the major molecular changes underway in this model of noise-induced hearing loss.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals, Noise Exposure, and Tissue Extraction

Details of the animal handling, noise exposure, and transcriptome creation have been given before (3). Briefly, locusts (Schistocerca gregaria) were reared in the gregarious phase with a 12-h light/dark cycle at 36.25°C, fed on a combination of fresh wheat and bran ad libitum. Male locusts between 10 and 20 d postimaginal molt were used for experiments. Wings were cut off at their base to increase noise exposure to the tympanal ears. Up to 20 locusts at a time were placed in a cylindrical wire mesh cage (8 cm diameter, 11 cm height) directly below a loudspeaker (Visaton FR 10 HM 4 OHM, RS Components) driven by a function generator (Thurlby Thandar Instruments TG550, RS Components) and an audio amplifier (Monacor PA-702, Insight Direct) to produce a 3-kHz tone at 126 dB sound pressure level (SPL), measured at the top of the cage, for 24 h continuously. Control locusts were selected, housed, and treated identically for 24 h, but without activating the 3-kHz tone. A total of 320 Müller’s organs from 160 noise-exposed locusts (2 ears per locust) were extracted by grasping the Müller’s organ (Fig. 1) through the tympanum with fine forceps and pulling it out. Another 320 Müller’s organs were extracted similarly from control animals. RNA extraction took place less than 4 h from the end of the 24-h noise exposure. Müller’s organs were snap frozen onto a pestle within an Eppendorf tube submerged in liquid nitrogen and RNA extracted and treated with DNase using an RNAqueous kit (AM1931, ThermoFisher). RNA was shipped in dry ice for Illumina HiSeq 2000 sequencing by Beijing Genomics Institute (Hong Kong). Sample RNA integrity values of 8.7 and 8.4 were given by control and noise-exposed samples, respectively. Both noise-exposed and control groups gave ∼186.1 million paired end reads of 100 nucleotides each.
Figure 1.

Stimulation of locust ears. Noise-exposed locusts (160 animals) were placed in a cylindrical wire mesh cage directly below a loudspeaker producing a 3-kHz tone at 126 dB sound pressure level (SPL) for 24 h continuously. Other conditions were normal (12-h light/dark cycle, 36.25°C). Controls (160 animals) were treated identically, except that the loudspeaker was silent. Locusts’ ears (black circle) comprise tympani on either the side of the abdomen, each innervated internally by a Müller’s organ, being a nerve ganglion containing at least four identifiable groups of scolopidial sensory neurons that proceed distally through the styliform, folded and pyriform structures to form close apposition with the tympanum (22, 23). At least two muscles are connected to the edge of the tympanum, close to an adjacent spiracle (not shown).

Stimulation of locust ears. Noise-exposed locusts (160 animals) were placed in a cylindrical wire mesh cage directly below a loudspeaker producing a 3-kHz tone at 126 dB sound pressure level (SPL) for 24 h continuously. Other conditions were normal (12-h light/dark cycle, 36.25°C). Controls (160 animals) were treated identically, except that the loudspeaker was silent. Locusts’ ears (black circle) comprise tympani on either the side of the abdomen, each innervated internally by a Müller’s organ, being a nerve ganglion containing at least four identifiable groups of scolopidial sensory neurons that proceed distally through the styliform, folded and pyriform structures to form close apposition with the tympanum (22, 23). At least two muscles are connected to the edge of the tympanum, close to an adjacent spiracle (not shown).

Transcript Discovery

Initial cDNA reads were groomed to select those with 80 or more contiguous nucleotides with Phred quality score of >19 to give a final database of ∼100 million pairs of reads each from control and noise-exposed groups. Two approaches were used to select transcripts for assembly. The first method was a targeted search for genes likely to be affected by noise exposure from known physiology. These included mechanically activated ion channels, membrane transporters for ions hypothetically involved in sensory transduction, cytoskeletal proteins, and molecules associated with synaptic transmission. Sequences of interest were identified by searching all possible translations of reads from the control transcriptome versus amino acid sequences of published genes using BLOSUM matching matrices (24). Closely related species were used when possible, but Drosophila melanogaster sequences were also used in some cases. The searches were conducted at relatively low stringency so that many unrelated genes were also found, assembled, and included in the list. Transcripts from this targeted approach included the genes that we described previously (3). The second method attempted to find individual reads with strongly different abundances in the two transcriptomes. The first 10 million pairs of each transcriptome were searched by counting the number of times that each read was repeated identically. This process was accelerated by removing all copies of each read from the abbreviated transcriptome as it was counted. This continued until all different reads were found in each set. This initial count took ∼3 mo of continuous process by two desktop computers. A second program then searched the two lists of reads for identically matching noise-exposed and control reads in each set and calculated the ratio of the two counts. Finally, matching reads with abundance ratios exceeding 3:1 in either direction were used for assembly, commencing with the highest and lowest ratios, and proceeding until a total of 500 different mRNA identifiable transcripts had been assembled.

Transcript Assembly and Abundance

Identified reads were used to assemble complete transcripts by the transcriptome walking algorithm (25) using an initial minimum overlap of 80 nucleotides. But increased overlap up to 95 was sometimes required to separate transcripts with common motifs or decreases to 60 overlaps for less abundant transcripts. Walking was always continued to identify the complete protein coding sequence, including both START and STOP codons. The walking steps attempted to identify each nucleotide from overlap of 40 reads and then used the highest quality 20 reads of each 40 for assembly. Single nucleotide polymorphisms were recorded where any alternate nucleotide contributed >10% of the reads, but all the reported transcripts represent the canonical sequences. Only transcripts with complete reading frames that could be putatively identified by the BLAST algorithm (US National Library of Medicine) were accepted into the final collection of 500. In the process, a total of 79 assembled sequences were separately classified as noncoding, partial, or unknown transcripts. Relative abundances of transcribed mRNA sequences in the two tissues were estimated by searching both complete groomed transcriptome libraries for reads matching the reading frame of each transcript, using the criterion of at least 90/100 identical nucleotide matches to score each read as derived from that transcript. Matching reads as a fraction of total reads counted were then normalized by reading frame length and expressed as abundance relative to the 40S ribosomal protein SA abundance in each transcriptome. This method has previously been found to agree closely with relative abundances estimated by quantitative PCR (26).

Fitting Relative Abundance Data

Abundance ratio values (Noise exposed/Control) were counted into histogram bins of 0.2 width (Fig. 2). The complete histogram was fitted by the Cauchy distribution (27): where x is abundance ratio, x0 is the location parameter, γ is the half width at half maximum, and A is the value of f(x) at x = x0. Fitting was performed using a minimum squared error method. Confidence intervals were obtained from the normalized cumulative distribution function, F(x), at the desired values by successive approximation, using the fitted values of x0 and γ:
Figure 2.

Distribution of ratios of abundances of mRNA transcripts from Müller’s organs of control and noise-exposed locusts. Ratio values were counted into histogram bins of 0.2 width. The continuous line shows the best fitting Cauchy distribution () with parameters x0 = 1.007, γ = 0.865. Dashed vertical lines indicate the 5% and 95% values of the normalized cumulative distribution () using the same fitted parameters. Values below and above unity correspond to transcripts with reduced and increased abundance in noise-exposed animals, respectively. x0, location parameter; γ, half width at half maximum.

Distribution of ratios of abundances of mRNA transcripts from Müller’s organs of control and noise-exposed locusts. Ratio values were counted into histogram bins of 0.2 width. The continuous line shows the best fitting Cauchy distribution () with parameters x0 = 1.007, γ = 0.865. Dashed vertical lines indicate the 5% and 95% values of the normalized cumulative distribution () using the same fitted parameters. Values below and above unity correspond to transcripts with reduced and increased abundance in noise-exposed animals, respectively. x0, location parameter; γ, half width at half maximum. All transcript discovery, assembly, abundance estimation, data processing, and fitting was performed by custom written software using the C++ language and desktop computers.

RESULTS

A total of 500 mRNA transcripts were assembled to include the complete amino acid reading frame, and in many cases the complete 5′ and 3′ end sequences. Identification codes, abundances in the control and noise-exposed transcriptomes, and putative functions of all transcripts are given in Table 1. Full nucleotide sequences, reading frames, translations, and single nucleotide polymorphisms for all transcripts are available at http://asf-pht.medicine.dal.ca/SCH_Web/. Reading frames ranged from 159 to 15,450 nucleotides (53–5,150 amino acids) with average length 1,927 nucleotides. Based on hypotheses from previous studies (3, 7), we noted that the list of transcripts included seven mechanically activated ion channels, 32 transmembrane transporters or pumps, 24 voltage- or ligand-activated ion channels, and 66 transcription or translation factors.
Table 1.

Schistocerca gregaria mRNA transcripts and abundances for control and noise-exposed animals

ID CodeGenBankControlNoisePutative Function
SCH_0001MW962393−2.432−2.253Actin 1
SCH_0002MK962884−2.298−2.272TRPV cation channel Inactive
SCH_0003MW962394−0.374−0.347GAPDH
SCH_0004MW9623950.5830.635Actin 2
SCH_0005MW962396−2.804−2.849Adenylate cyclase type 2
SCH_0006MW962397−1.441−1.643Actin 3
SCH_0007MW962398−3.451−3.396Ankyrin repeat and death containing protein
SCH_0008MW962399−2.916−2.959TRPN cation channel NompC
SCH_0009MW962400−2.739−2.785Ankyrin repeat containing 27-like
SCH_0010MW962401−1.700−1.781Ankyrin repeat containing 54-like
SCH_0011MW962402−2.242−2.259Mariner Mos1 transpoase
SCH_0012MW962403−3.100−3.161Distal antennal-like
SCH_0013MW962404−1.673−1.650Basement membrane-specific heparan sulfate proteoglycan core protein
SCH_0014MW962405−1.893−1.883NDUFAF4
SCH_0015MW962406−0.369−0.877Apolipophorin precursor
SCH_0016MK962885−2.172−2.135TRPV cation channel Nanchung
SCH_0017MK962886−2.258−2.232Piezo
SCH_0018MW962407−1.719−1.717Synaptophysin
SCH_0019MW962408−1.616−1.588Synaptotagmin
SCH_0020MW962409−1.169−1.186Synaptosomal-Associated Protein SNAP 25
SCH_0021MW962410−1.949−1.981Transmembrane channel TMC 7
SCH_0022MW962411−0.525−0.487Na/K ATPase
SCH_0023MW962412−2.086−2.202Solute carrier family 12
SCH_0024MW962413−1.964−1.857Bumetanide-sensitive K/Na/Cl transporter
SCH_0025MW962414−1.971−2.015Bumetanide-sensitive K/Na/Cl transporter
SCH_0026MW962415−2.400−2.543Na/H Exchanger
SCH_0027MW962416−3.193−3.057Na/H Exchanger
SCH_0028MW962417−1.697−1.736Ca-transporting ATPase
SCH_0029MW962418−3.319−3.064Na/H Exchanger
SCH_0030MW962419−2.423−2.442K channel Shaker
SCH_0031MW962420−1.965−1.985G-protein activated IR K channel
SCH_0032MW9624210.1500.243Tubulin alpha
SCH_0033MW9624220.1940.236Tubulin alpha
SCH_0034MW962423−0.143−0.127Tubulin alpha
SCH_0035MW962424−1.066−1.081Spectrin alpha chain
SCH_0036MW962425−2.797−2.911EAG K channel
SCH_0037MW962426−1.675−1.654MAP kinase-activated protein kinase
SCH_0038MW962427−1.748−1.840CaM kinase II
SCH_0039MW962428−1.588−1.665Protein kinase DC2
SCH_0040MW962429−2.095−2.168DENN domain containing protein
SCH_0041MW962430−1.714−1.809Carboxylesterase
SCH_0042MW962431−0.585−0.472Carboxylesterase
SCH_0043MW962432−0.270−0.185Aquaporin
SCH_0044MW962433−0.973−2.136Carboxylesterase
SCH_0045MW962434−1.152−1.093Carboxylesterase
SCH_0046MW962435−0.330−0.200Carboxylesterase
SCH_0047MW962436−0.756−0.680Carboxylesterase
SCH_0048MW962437−1.345−1.282Carboxylesterase
SCH_0049MW962438−1.279−1.375Carboxylesterase
SCH_0050MW962439−2.129−2.077Carboxylesterase
SCH_0051MW962440−1.214−1.101Carboxylesterase
SCH_0052MW962441−2.081−2.116Acetylcholine esterase
SCH_0053MW962442−1.773−1.798Serine-threonine protein phosphatase II
SCH_0054MW962443−1.726−1.754Serine-threonine protein phosphatase II
SCH_0055MW962444−1.974−2.065Beta-arrestin 1
SCH_0056MW962445−1.717−1.6233-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase
SCH_0057MW962446−2.408−2.4415-AMP-activated protein kinase catalytic subunit α2
SCH_0058MW962447−2.200−2.247Calcium/calmodulin-responsive adenylate cyclase
SCH_0059MW962448−2.440−2.482Adenylate cyclase type 9
SCH_0060MW962449−2.892−2.892Adenylate cyclase type 8
SCH_0061MW962450−1.786−1.794Ankyrin 3
SCH_0062MW962451−2.146−2.175Ankyrin 3
SCH_0063MW962452−1.272−1.262Argonaute 2
SCH_0064MW962453−2.462−2.519Argonaute 2
SCH_0065MW962454−2.484−2.627Argonaute 1
SCH_0066MW962455−2.708−2.664G protein-activated IR K channel
SCH_0067MW962456−1.809−1.901Spectrin beta chain
SCH_0068MW962457−2.955−2.871Ca-activated K channel slowpoke
SCH_0069MW962458−0.597−0.586ATP-dependent RNA helicase
SCH_0070MW962459−0.583−0.584ATP-dependent RNA helicase
SCH_0071MW962460−0.372−0.425ATP-dependent RNA helicase
SCH_0072MW962461−0.901−0.911Basigin
SCH_0073MW962462−0.737−0.859C-type lysozyme
SCH_0074MW962463−0.356−0.306Calmodulin
SCH_0075MW962464−0.626−0.606Calmodulin
SCH_0076MW962465−1.237−1.262Calpain
SCH_0077MW962466−0.435−0.423Calreticulin
SCH_0078MW962467−2.047−2.085Voltage-activated Na channel alpha subunit
SCH_0079MW962468−2.117−2.062Voltage-activated Cl channel CLC type
SCH_0080MW962469−1.551−1.534HCN channel
SCH_0081MW962470−1.344−1.407K channel subfamily K member
SCH_0082MW962471−1.622−1.600cAMP-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit
SCH_0083MW962472−1.398−1.438cAMP-dependent protein kinase type II regulatory subunit
SCH_0084MW962473−1.650−1.611Cryptochrome 2
SCH_0085MW962474−2.302−2.306Cryptochrome 2
SCH_0086MW962475−1.274−1.271CRAC Calcium release-activated calcium channel
SCH_0087MW962476−2.151−2.155Cyclin-dependent kinase 5
SCH_0088MW962477−2.006−1.982Diacylglycerol kinase epsilon
SCH_0089MW962478−1.788−1.781Diacylglycerol kinase theta
SCH_0090MW962479−2.007−1.969Protein kinase CP
SCH_0091MW962480−2.304−2.345Dicer 1
SCH_0092MW962481−0.2040.085Endocuticle structural glycoprotein SgAbd 2
SCH_0093MW962482−1.611−1.661Epidermal growth factor receptor
SCH_0094MW962483−2.856−2.774Glycine receptor alpha subunit
SCH_0095MW962484−0.706−0.581Phe-4-monooxygenase (Henna)
SCH_0096MW962485−2.269−2.281Huntingtin
SCH_0097MW962486−2.111−2.169IP3 receptor
SCH_0098MW962487−2.465−2.557Peripheral plasma membrane protein CASK
SCH_0099MW962488−1.929−1.939E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase parkin
SCH_0100MW962489−1.711−1.705Serine/threonine-protein kinase Tricorner
SCH_0101MW962490−2.165−2.172Serine/threonine-protein kinase Warts
SCH_0102MW962491−2.215−2.301Ribosomal protein S6 kinase beta
SCH_0103MW962492−1.726−1.6721-phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate phosphodiesterase
SCH_0104MW962493−2.449−2.5711-phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate phosphodiesterase
SCH_0105MW962494−1.142−1.131Na/H exchange regulatory cofactor
SCH_0106MZ004840−0.053−0.012NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1 (mitochondrial)
SCH_0107MW962495−2.124−2.149Phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate 3- phosphatase
SCH_0108MW962496−0.122−0.08714-3-3 protein zeta
SCH_0109MW962497−0.682−0.65614-3-3 protein epsilon
SCH_0110MW962498−1.890−1.9635-oxoprolinase
SCH_0111MW962499−1.308−1.327Cation/H exchanger NHE
SCH_0112MW962500−1.544−1.508V-type proton ATPase subunit H
SCH_0113MW962501−1.189−1.146V-type proton ATPase subunit B
SCH_0114MW962502−1.145−1.136V-type proton ATPase catalytic subunit A
SCH_0115MW962503−1.152−1.143V-type proton ATPase subunit D
SCH_0116MW962504−0.864−0.828V-type proton ATPase subunit E
SCH_0117MW962505−1.747−1.744Calcium permeable stress-gated cation channel
SCH_0118MW962506−0.376−0.268Annexin B9
SCH_0119MW962507−0.902−0.900Annexin B9
SCH_0120MW962508−1.512−1.494Annulin
SCH_0121MW962509−1.336−1.458Hemocyte protein-glutamine γ-glutamyltransferase
SCH_0122MW962510−1.718−1.683Anoctamin (Ca-activated Cl channel)
SCH_0123MW962511−2.312−2.347Anoctamin (Ca-activated Cl channel)
SCH_0124MW962512−1.196−1.103Carbonic anhydrase
SCH_0125MW962513−0.865−1.010Carbonic anhydrase
SCH_0126MW962514−1.681−1.774Carbonic anhydrase
SCH_0127MW962515−0.234−0.242Eukaryotic initiation factor 4 A-II
SCH_0128MW962516−1.192−1.420Attractin-like
SCH_0129MW962517−2.724−2.957Attractin-like
SCH_0130MW962518−1.304−1.205Collagen alpha chain
SCH_0131MW962519−1.874−1.829Collagen alpha chain
SCH_0132MW962520−1.455−1.373Collagen apha chain
SCH_0133MW962521−1.931−1.918Chromatin-remodeling ATPase INO80
SCH_0134MW962522−2.197−2.237Helicase domino
SCH_0135MW962523−2.073−2.016Helicase-like
SCH_0136MW962524−2.231−2.111Eyes absent
SCH_0137MW962525−2.114−2.312Ecdysone receptor
SCH_0138MW962526−1.723−1.872Retinoid-X receptor
SCH_0139MW962527−2.500−2.640Embryonic gonad like
SCH_0140MW962528−2.690−2.667Nuclear hormone receptor
SCH_0141MW962529−2.745−2.742Nuclear hormone receptor
SCH_0142MW962530−2.109−2.061Early growth response protein
SCH_0143MW962531−3.147−3.133Tyramine receptor
SCH_0144MW9625320.1410.332Endocuticle structural glycoprotein SgAbd 4
SCH_0145MW962533−1.460−1.232Endocuticle structural glycoprotein SgAbd 3
SCH_0146MW962534−2.996−3.032Na/Ca exchanger
SCH_0147MW962535−2.210−2.238Na/H Exchanger
SCH_0148MW962536−2.184−2.207GABA A receptor beta subunit
SCH_0149MW962537−1.654−1.560Glutamate-gated chloride channel
SCH_0150MW962538−2.410−2.447Glutamate-gated chloride channel
SCH_0151MW962539−2.684−2.754GABA B receptor subunit 1
SCH_0152MW962540−2.554−2.545Choline acetyltransferase
SCH_0153MW962541−3.304−3.440GABA B receptor subunit 2
SCH_0154MW962542−2.235−2.238Sodium bicarbonate cotransporter
SCH_0155MW962543−1.437−1.524Band 3 anion transporter
SCH_0156MW962544−1.118−1.194Dystonin
SCH_0157MW962545−1.277−1.265Microtubule-associated protein
SCH_0158MW962546−1.387−1.379Microtubule-associated serine-threonine kinase
SCH_0159MW962547−2.178−2.221Microtubule-associated serine-threonine kinase
SCH_0160MW962548−2.142−2.154Serine-threonine kinase sgk-like
SCH_0161MW962549−1.573−1.527Serine-threonine kinase grp
SCH_0162MW962550−1.913−1.881Tubulin gamma
SCH_0163MW962551−1.890−2.230Myosin heavy chain
SCH_0164MW962552−1.899−2.155Myosin light chain
SCH_0165MW962553−1.991−2.015TRPML3 (mucolipin 3)
SCH_0166MW962554−3.189−3.174Pickpocket (ENaC, ASIC family)
SCH_0167MW962555−2.869−2.891Glutamate-gated chloride channel
SCH_0168MW962556−2.171−2.285Transcriptional repressor Scratch
SCH_0169MW962557−2.176−2.182Zinc finger protein 432-like
SCH_0170MW962558−2.308−2.339Locust corazonin-related transcriptional factor
SCH_0171MW962559−1.963−1.960Zinc finger protein 271-like
SCH_0172MW962560−1.629−1.602Zinc finger protein 271-like
SCH_0173MW962561−2.338−2.367Zinc finger protein 236-like
SCH_0174MW962562−2.115−2.107Zinc finger protein 62-like
SCH_0175MW962563−2.560−2.489Zinc finger protein 341-like
SCH_0176MW962564−2.368−2.308Zinc finger protein 271-like
SCH_0177MW962565−2.430−2.368Zinc finger protein 813-like
SCH_0178MW962566−2.251−2.220Zinc finger protein 32-like
SCH_0179MW962567−2.218−2.218Zinc finger protein 135-like
SCH_0180MW962568−2.333−2.358Zinc finger protein 569-like
SCH_0181MW962569−1.986−2.012Zinc finger protein 2-like
SCH_0182MW962570−1.899−1.917Dicer 2
SCH_0183MW962571−1.449−1.455Eukaryotic initiation factor 3 A
SCH_0184MW9625720.3780.378Elongation factor 1 alpha
SCH_0185MW962573−1.107−1.079Eukaryotic initiation factor 2 subunit 1
SCH_0186MW962574−2.109−2.095DSCAM 2
SCH_0187MW962575−2.137−2.150Dynamin
SCH_0188MW962576−2.143−2.154Dynamin
SCH_0189MW962577−1.793−1.791Dynamin
SCH_0190MW962578−2.027−2.053Enhancer of sevenless 2B
SCH_0191MW962579−1.190−1.188Lamin Dm0
SCH_0192MW962580−1.867−1.853E3 ubuquitin-protein kinase RNF123
SCH_0193MW962581−0.711−0.670Voltage-dependent anion channel
SCH_0194MW962582−1.677−1.673L-type calcium channel beta subunit
SCH_0195MW962583−1.863−1.868L-type calcium channel beta subunit
SCH_0196MW962584−0.654−0.602Chitin deacetylase
SCH_0197MW962585−0.490−0.349Chitin deacetylase
SCH_0198MW962586−1.079−0.987Chitin deacetylase
SCH_0199MW962587−1.911−2.319Troponin
SCH_0200MW962588−1.456−1.505Alpha actinin
SCH_0201MW962589−1.197−1.200Spectrin beta chain
SCH_0202MW962590−1.471−1.460Lola - longitdinals lacking
SCH_0203MW962591−1.459−1.483Bric-a-brac-like
SCH_0204MW962592−1.147−1.162BTG 2
SCH_0205MW962593−1.572−1.593BTG 3
SCH_0206MW962594−1.518−1.547Calcium-transporting ATPase
SCH_0207MW962595−2.647−2.688Neural cadherin
SCH_0208MW9625960.719−0.424Vitellogenin A
SCH_0209MW962597−0.872−0.875Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2-17 kDA
SCH_0210MZ0048410.8640.877Cytochrome B (mitochondrial)
SCH_0211MW962598−0.836−0.816Ras-related protein Rab 1 A
SCH_0212MZ0048421.3231.341Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (mitochondrial)
SCH_0213MW9625990.3520.358ATP-ADP translocator
SCH_0214MW962600−0.304−0.229Arginine kinase
SCH_0215MW9626010.6220.194Hexamerin-like
SCH_0216MW962602−0.150−0.12940S ribosomal protein S4
SCH_0217MW962603−0.166−0.198Polyubiquitin
SCH_0218MW962604−0.457−0.357Heat shock protein 90
SCH_0219MW9626050.2350.062Imaginal disc growth factor
SCH_0220MW9626060.3480.355Tubulin beta
SCH_0221MW962607−0.478−0.535Superoxide dismutase [Cu-Zn]
SCH_0222MW962608−1.530−1.607Lacunin
SCH_0223MZ0048430.9991.009ATP synthase F0 subunit 6 (mitochondrial)
SCH_0224MZ0048440.9190.941Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 2 (mitochondrial)
SCH_0225MW9626090.3760.360Icarapin-like
SCH_0226MZ0048450.9761.002Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 3 (mitochondrial)
SCH_0227MW9626100.687−0.458Vitellogenin B
SCH_0228MW9626110.437−0.580Hexamerin-like
SCH_0229MW9626120.0000.00040S ribosomal protein SA
SCH_0230MW962613−0.979−0.972Sortilin-related receptor
SCH_0231MW962614−0.782−0.597Pacifastin-related peptide precursor
SCH_0232MW962615−0.120−0.019Transferrin
SCH_0233MW9626160.317−0.216Hexamerin-like
SCH_0234MW962617−0.348−0.268Thioredoxin 2-like
SCH_0235MW9626180.5140.557Heat shock protein 70
SCH_0236MW962619−0.394−0.427Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 5
SCH_0237MW962620−0.206−0.18160S ribosomal protein L19
SCH_0238MW962621−1.711−1.663Solute carrier family 25 member 44
SCH_0239MW962622−0.346−0.333ATP synthase subunit alpha (mitochondrial)
SCH_0240MW962623−0.774−0.723NDRG3
SCH_0241MW9626240.1000.123Activating transcription factor of chaperone
SCH_0242MW962625−0.606−0.618Ly 6 neurotoxin
SCH_0243MW962626−2.951−3.012Glutamate receptor, ionotropic
SCH_0244MW9626270.0810.039Ferritin heavy subunit
SCH_0245MW962628−0.720−0.969Facilitated trehalose transporter
SCH_0246MW962629−0.910−0.834Innexin 2
SCH_0247MW962630−0.087−0.440Gamma butyrobetaine dioxygenase
SCH_0248MW962631−0.376−0.355Ly 6 neurotoxin
SCH_0249MW9626320.0450.137Tubulin beta
SCH_0250MW962633−0.215−0.162Midline fasciclin
SCH_0251MW962634−1.321−1.316GTP-binding protein sar1
SCH_0252MW962635−0.492−0.544Legumain
SCH_0253MW962636−1.576−1.597Membrane-associated protein sar1
SCH_0254MW962637−1.933−1.906Exocyst complex component 5
SCH_0255MW962638−1.983−2.577GILT-like
SCH_0256MW962639−1.744−1.850Fibrillin 2
SCH_0257MW962640−1.395−1.402CLCN3 H/Cl exchange transporter 3
SCH_0258MW962641−1.209−1.182DNA topoisomerase (mitochondrial)
SCH_0259MW962642−1.448−1.420Farnesol dehydrogenase
SCH_0260MW962643−1.704−1.750CLUH Clustered mitochondrial protein homolog
SCH_0261MW962644−1.292−1.282Alpha-2-macroglobulin receptor-associated protein
SCH_0262MW962645−0.618−0.638Integral membrane protein 2 C
SCH_0263MW962646−1.654−1.651Isocitrate dehydrogenase [NAD] γ-subunit (mitochondrial)
SCH_0264MW962647−0.967−0.959Phosphoglycerate mutase 2
SCH_0265MW9626480.2150.214Translationally-controlled tumor protein
SCH_0266MW962649−0.651−0.678ADP-ribosylation factor 1
SCH_0267MW962650−1.525−1.548Solute carrier family 22
SCH_0268MW962651−0.0260.039Defense protein
SCH_0269MW962652−1.389−1.407Integrin
SCH_0270MW962653−0.951−1.005Nose resistant to fluoxetine protein 6
SCH_0271MW962654−1.514−1.491GTP-binding protein 128up
SCH_0272MW962655−0.921−0.912Succinate dehydrogenase flavoprotein subunit (mitochondrial)
SCH_0273MW962656−0.320−0.196Spermine synthase
SCH_0274MW962657−1.188−1.163Carbohydrate sulfotransferase 11
SCH_0275MW962658−2.080−2.060Uridine-cytidine kinase-like 1
SCH_0276MW962659−0.435−0.437Protein krasavietz
SCH_0277MW962660−0.114−0.394Nuclear protein 1
SCH_0278MW9626610.0740.085Elongation factor 2
SCH_0279MW962662−0.610−0.765Peroxiredoxin 6
SCH_0280MW9626630.0390.074Chemosensory protein precursor
SCH_0281MW962664−0.063−0.102Polyadenylate-binding protein 1
SCH_0282MW962665−0.712−0.699Poly(U)-specific endoribonuclease
SCH_0283MW962666−1.029−0.957Sodium-dependent phosphate transporter 1-A
SCH_0284MW962667−1.285−1.252N-acetyltransferase san
SCH_0285MW962668−1.266−1.287ABC transporter G family member 23
SCH_0286MW962669−1.983−1.994Tetratricopeptide Repeat TANC2
SCH_0287MW962670−1.538−1.602Transmembrane protein 53
SCH_0288MW962671−1.027−1.397Pancreatic lipase-related protein 2
SCH_0289MW962672−1.188−1.204Singed
SCH_0290MW9626730.212−0.104Apolipophorin III
SCH_0291MW962674−1.744−1.810Myelin regulatory factor
SCH_0292MW962675−0.862−0.841CHCHD10 (mitochondrial)
SCH_0293MW962676−0.574−0.502Dynein light chain A
SCH_0294MW962677−1.476−1.491Transcription factor CP2
SCH_0295MW962678−0.435−0.438Profilin
SCH_0296MW962679−1.549−1.537Nicastrin
SCH_0297MW962680−0.390−0.415Inhibitor of apoptosis
SCH_0298MW962681−0.612−0.573Leupaxin
SCH_0299MW962682−0.687−0.669Transcription factor BTF3
SCH_0300MW962683−1.268−1.325Atlastin
SCH_0301MW962684−0.873−0.877Beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase
SCH_0302MW962685−0.311−0.219Endocuticle structural glycoprotein SgAbd 5
SCH_0303MW962686−0.030−0.073Ferritin subunit
SCH_0304MW962687−1.159−1.139Actin-binding LIM protein 3
SCH_0305MW962688−0.240−0.288Fructose 1,6-bisphosphate aldolase
SCH_0306MZ004846−0.114−0.283NADH dehydrogenase subunit 6 (mitochondrial)
SCH_0307MW962689−0.289−0.25540S ribosomal protein S24
SCH_0308MW962690−0.232−0.057Chemosensory protein CSP-sg4
SCH_0309MW962691−0.850−0.864Double-stranded RNA-binding protein Staufen
SCH_0310MW962692−0.246−0.197Myophilin
SCH_0311MW962693−0.246−0.242ATP-synthase subunit beta
SCH_0312MW962694−2.208−2.197Aminopeptidase N
SCH_0313MW962695−1.770−1.750Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1
SCH_0314MW962696−1.938−1.892Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 9
SCH_0315MW962697−1.831−1.853Tyrosine-protein phosphatase Lar
SCH_0316MW962698−2.161−2.187Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 4
SCH_0317MW962699−1.932−1.938Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 69 D
SCH_0318MW962700−1.871−1.847Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 99 A
SCH_0319MW962701−1.970−2.238Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 5-like
SCH_0320MW962702−1.762−1.729Receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase N2
SCH_0321MW962703−2.517−2.642Tyrosine−protein phosphatase non-receptor type 14
SCH_0322MW962704−1.642−1.652Presenilin
SCH_0323MW962705−1.443−1.444Zinc finger protein 330 homolog
SCH_0324MW962706−0.788−0.306Chemosensory protein precursor
SCH_0325MW962707−0.240−0.22460S ribosomal protein L36
SCH_0326MW962708−0.400−0.36660S ribosomal protein L18a
SCH_0327MW962709−0.879−0.739Serpin
SCH_0328MW962710−0.733−0.764Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 2
SCH_0329MW962711−1.852−1.812Mitochondrial intermediate peptidase
SCH_0330MW962712−1.207−1.176Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit D
SCH_0331MW962713−1.397−1.616Cystathionine beta-synthase
SCH_0332MW962714−0.140−0.796Hexamerin-like
SCH_0333MW962715−1.296−1.313rap1 GTPase-activating protein 1
SCH_0334MW962716−2.852−2.910Glutamate receptor, ionotropic
SCH_0335MW962717−2.721−2.817Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, beta subunit
SCH_0336MW962718−2.336−2.349Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, alpha subunit
SCH_0337MW962719−1.228−1.301Aldehyde dehydrogenase
SCH_0338MW962720−1.435−1.439Coatomer subunit delta
SCH_0339MW962721−0.576−0.543Histone H3
SCH_0340MW962722−1.256−1.226Proton-coupled amino acid transporter-like
SCH_0341MW962723−0.912−0.921Ras-related protein rab7
SCH_0342MW962724−1.463−1.462Programmed cell death protein 10
SCH_0343MW962725−1.666−1.639Adenosylhomocysteinase
SCH_0344MW962726−0.992−1.033ATP-citrate synthase
SCH_0345MW962727−1.307−1.279Armadillo
SCH_0346MW962728−1.591−1.579Enoyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] reductase
SCH_0347MW962729−0.936−1.049Vigilin
SCH_0348MW962730−0.487−0.495Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase
SCH_0349MZ0048470.0200.050NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 (mitochondrial)
SCH_0350MW962731−0.796−0.316Chemosensory protein
SCH_0351MW962732−0.639−0.661DnaJ subfamily A member 2
SCH_0352MW962733−1.034−1.052Angiotensin-converting enzyme
SCH_0353MW962734−0.760−0.735Myosin regulatory light chain sqh
SCH_0354MW962735−0.920−0.855Succinate dehydrogenase
SCH_0355MW962736−1.413−1.372Glucose-induced degradation protein 8
SCH_0356MW962737−0.965−0.984Nascent polypeptide-associated complex α-subunit
SCH_0357MW962738−0.898−0.899Splicing factor U2AF 50 kDa subunit
SCH_0358MW962739−1.581−1.445Proton-coupled amino acid transporter-like CG1139
SCH_0359MW962740−0.240−0.21240S ribosomal protein S10-like
SCH_0360MW962741−0.341−0.349Prosaposin
SCH_0361MW962742−0.652−0.709Cathepsin B
SCH_0362MW962743−0.201−0.865Hexamerin-like
SCH_0363MW962744−1.349−1.514Cysteine sulfinic acid decarboxylase
SCH_0364MW962745−1.276−1.278Peroxisomal biogenesis factor 19
SCH_0365MW962746−0.876−0.845Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K
SCH_0366MW962747−2.299−2.376Inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase K
SCH_0367MW962748−0.410−0.455Ornithine decarboxylase
SCH_0368MW962749−0.168−0.12360S ribosomal protein L7a
SCH_0369MW962750−1.603−1.589ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX54
SCH_0370MW962751−1.714−1.708Apoptosis-inducing factor 1, mitochondrial
SCH_0371MW962752−0.943−0.899DNA-directed RNA polymerases I, II, and III subunit RPABC3
SCH_0372MW962753−0.306−0.294ADP, ATP carrier protein
SCH_0373MW962754−1.065−1.082ATP-dependent RNA helicase dbp2
SCH_0374MW962755−1.408−1.473Aspartate aminotransferase, cytoplasmic-like
SCH_0375MW962756−1.550−1.503Protein 5NUC
SCH_0376MW962757−0.702−0.604Sigma glutathione S-transferase
SCH_0377MW962758−1.787−1.745DEAD-box helicase Dbp80
SCH_0378MW962759−1.644−1.642Hydroxyacylglutathione hydrolase, mitochondrial
SCH_0379MW962760−2.156−2.098Ribitol-5-phosphate xylosyltransferase 1
SCH_0380MW962761−1.381−1.359Dihydropyrimidinase
SCH_0381MW962762−0.716−0.648Protein stunted
SCH_0382MW962763−0.799−0.737Cytochrome b reductase 1
SCH_0383MW962764−1.407−1.324Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit K
SCH_0384MW962765−1.562−1.567WASH complex subunit 3
SCH_0385MW962766−0.319−0.30240S ribosomal protein S16
SCH_0386MW962767−0.356−0.32960S ribosomal protein L15
SCH_0387MW962768−1.392−0.916Lysozyme-like
SCH_0388MW962769−1.403−1.376Proteasome subunit alpha type-2
SCH_0389MW962770−0.607−0.556Protein tyrosine phosphatase type IVA 1
SCH_0390MW962771−1.148−1.140Charged multivesicular body protein 4c
SCH_0391MW962772−0.516−0.518Malate dehydrogenase
SCH_0392MW962773−0.953−0.950Mid1-interacting protein 1
SCH_0393MW962774−0.152−0.12760S ribosomal protein L18
SCH_0394MW962775−1.344−1.367GDAP2 homolog
SCH_0395MW962776−0.501−0.456Heat shock protein 20.6
SCH_0396MW962777−1.294−1.291ATP-binding cassette sub-family F member 2
SCH_0397MW962778−0.572−1.071Prostatic acid phosphatase
SCH_0398MW962779−0.641−0.620S-phase kinase-associated protein 1
SCH_0399MW962780−0.242−0.21060S ribosomal protein L8
SCH_0400MW962781−1.362−1.388Actin-related protein 2/3 complex subunit 5-like
SCH_0401MW962782−1.100−1.167Tudor-SN
SCH_0402MW962783−1.050−1.068CYP450
SCH_0403MW962784−1.246−1.431Trehalase
SCH_0404MW962785−1.132−1.131Peroxisomal membrane protein 2
SCH_0405MW962786−0.943−0.954Angiotensin-converting enzyme
SCH_0406MW962787−0.321−0.29860S ribosomal protein L4
SCH_0407MW962788−0.975−0.970Na/K ATPase beta
SCH_0408MW962789−0.607−0.631Glutathione S-transferase delta
SCH_0409MW962790−0.497−0.472Phosphate carrier 2
SCH_0410MW962791−2.200−2.239Phosphate carrier 1
SCH_0411MW962792−1.636−1.625Transcription factor MafK
SCH_0412MW962793−1.334−1.370Segmentation protein cap'n'collar
SCH_0413MW962794−1.110−1.057Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 i
SCH_0414MW962795−1.803−1.811Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 15-like
SCH_0415MW962796−1.292−1.316Acyl-CoA-binding protein homolog
SCH_0416MW962797−1.576−1.606Pyroglutamyl-peptidase 1
SCH_0417MW962798−1.615−1.627Zeta glutathione S-transferase
SCH_0418MW962799−2.145−2.233SAX-3
SCH_0419MW962800−1.540−1.6195-aminolevulinate synthase, erythroid-specific, mitochondrial
SCH_0420MW962801−0.923−0.922Nucleobindin-2
SCH_0421MW962802−1.989−2.039Dyslexia-associated protein KIAA0319-like
SCH_0422MW962803−0.604−0.601Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase 5
SCH_0423MW962804−0.513−0.489Thymosin
SCH_0424MW962805−1.308−1.256Fatty acyl-CoA reductase
SCH_0425MW962806−1.289−1.231T-complex protein subunit eta
SCH_0426MW962807−0.609−1.585Timeless
SCH_0427MW962808−1.071−1.066Cuticlin-1
SCH_0428MW962809−1.146−1.140Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit C
SCH_0429MW962810−1.330−1.399Ig-like and fibronectin type-III domain-containing protein 1
SCH_0430MW962811−1.320−1.314CD109 antigen-like
SCH_0431MW962812−1.545−1.541Poly(rC)-binding protein 3
SCH_0432MW962813−0.541−0.555tRNA (uracil-5-)-methyltransferase
SCH_0433MW962814−0.795−0.804Enolase
SCH_0434MW962815−1.397−1.401NAD-dependent protein deacetylase sirtuin-2
SCH_0435MW962816−1.603−1.600TM2 domain-containing protein CG11103
SCH_0436MW962817−1.525−1.527Dynein beta chain, ciliary
SCH_0437MW962818−0.981−0.968Peroxidase
SCH_0438MW962819−1.491−1.487Phospholipid phosphatase 2
SCH_0439MW962820−1.544−1.586Draper
SCH_0440MW962821−0.378−0.398Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5 A
SCH_0441MW962822−0.061−0.08140S ribosomal protein S20
SCH_0442MW962823−0.286−0.163Chemosensory protein
SCH_0443MW962824−1.139−0.964Cytochrome P450 CYP4G102
SCH_0444MW962825−0.908−0.920Leucine-rich repeat protein SHOC-2
SCH_0445MW962826−0.610−0.664Y-box factor homolog
SCH_0446MW962827−1.889−1.857Zinc transporter 9
SCH_0447MW962828−1.604−1.265Endocuticle structural glycoprotein SgAbd 2
SCH_0448MW962829−1.744−1.338Endocuticle structural glycoprotein SgAbd 8
SCH_0449MW962830−1.290−1.286Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit B
SCH_0450MW962831−1.217−1.153Apyrase
SCH_0451MW962832−1.550−1.539Myotubularin-related protein 9
SCH_0452MW962833−1.067−1.077Ras-related protein Rab-5C
SCH_0453MW962834−1.482−1.453Proteasome subunit alpha type-6
SCH_0454MW962835−0.649−0.827Serine protease 42
SCH_0455MW962836−1.732−1.749E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase HECTD1
SCH_0456MW962837−2.694−2.668EHMT2 histone-lysine N-methyltransferase
SCH_0457MW962838−0.928−0.971Enoyl-CoA hydratase, mitochondrial
SCH_0458MW962839−1.312−1.237Transcription factor Kayak
SCH_0459MW962840−2.248−2.277Zinc finger protein 674-like
SCH_0460MW962841−3.194−3.182DNA methyltransferase 1
SCH_0461MW962842−1.041−1.088Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit J
SCH_0462MW962843−0.930−0.907Myeloid leukemia factor
SCH_0463MW962844−0.717−0.648Stathmin
SCH_0464MW962845−1.705−1.741Gualynate kinase
SCH_0465MW962846−1.234−1.237Kinase D-interacting substrate of 220 kDA
SCH_0466MW962847−1.551−1.603Thaumatin-like
SCH_0467MW962848−1.010−1.389Clavesin-1
SCH_0468MW962849−1.486−1.455Echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like
SCH_0469MW962850−0.759−0.774ras-like GTP-binding protein Rho1
SCH_0470MW962851−1.723−1.743Structural maintenance of chromosomes protein 4
SCH_0471MW962852−1.792−1.777Lethal(2) giant larvae protein
SCH_0472MW962853−0.530−0.528Iron-sulfur cluster assembly scaffold protein IscU
SCH_0473MW962854−0.840−0.799GABA receptor-associated protein
SCH_0474MW962855−0.635−1.787Greglin
SCH_0475MW962856−1.938−2.109Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase
SCH_0476MW962857−1.221−1.412D-arabinitol dehydrogenase 1
SCH_0477MW962858−0.724−1.045Lipoyltransferase 1
SCH_0478MW962859−1.115−1.429Multifunctional protein ADE2
SCH_0479MW962860−1.054−1.088Gelsolin
SCH_0480MW962861−1.094−1.086Upregulated during skeletal muscle growth 5
SCH_0481MW962862−0.356−0.328Cysteine-rich protein 1
SCH_0482MW962863−0.249−0.21040S ribosomal protein S7
SCH_0483MW962864−0.147−0.12940S ribosomal protein S8
SCH_0484MW962865−0.180−0.14440S ribosomal protein S3a
SCH_0485MW962866−1.089−1.042Protein D2
SCH_0486MW962867−0.500−0.523X-box-binding protein 1
SCH_0487MW962868−1.197−1.014Lipopolysaccharide-induced TNF α-factor
SCH_0488MW962869−2.720−2.827Dimmed
SCH_0489MW962870−3.474−3.463Homeobox protein six1
SCH_0490MW962871−1.466−1.467Dynein heavy chain, cytoplasmic
SCH_0491MW962872−0.974−0.949Growth hormone-inducible transmembrane protein-like
SCH_0492MW962873−0.407−0.553MAP kinase-interacting serine/threonine-proteinkinase 1
SCH_0493MW962874−0.510−0.695Catalase
SCH_0494MW962875−0.723−0.804Transketolase
SCH_0495MW962876−0.836−0.793Proteoglycan carrier of wingless
SCH_0496MW962877−1.300−1.362Lachesin
SCH_0497MW962878−0.785−1.110Acyl-CoA Delta(11) desaturase
SCH_0498MW962879−1.058−0.993Obstructor D2
SCH_0499MW962880−0.650−0.654Merlin (moesin-ezrin-radixin-like)
SCH_0500MW962881−1.288−1.238Huntingtin-interacting protein K

Abundance values are given as log10([mRNA of X]/[mRNA of 40S Ribosomal protein SA]). Functions are taken from the most similar BLAST search using default parameters. A list in alphabetical function order is available at http://asf-pht.medicine.dal.ca/SCH_Web/.

Schistocerca gregaria mRNA transcripts and abundances for control and noise-exposed animals Abundance values are given as log10([mRNA of X]/[mRNA of 40S Ribosomal protein SA]). Functions are taken from the most similar BLAST search using default parameters. A list in alphabetical function order is available at http://asf-pht.medicine.dal.ca/SCH_Web/.

Distribution of Abundance Ratios

Abundance measurements were obtained by counting all the reads in each transcriptome that had overlapping agreement with a minimum or 90 contiguous nucleotides of the reading frame. The raw average ratio of all abundances (noise exposed/control) was 1.065, indicating close similarity between the general properties of the two transcriptomes. All abundances were normalized by the abundances of 40S Ribosomal SA transcripts in the two transcriptomes, yielding an average normalized ratio of 0.993. The distribution of abundance ratios was wide, ranging from 0.069 to 3.038 (noise exposed/control), with a narrow peak near 1.0 (Fig. 2). This experimental distribution failed several tests for normality. For example, the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test rejected the null hypothesis for normality with P < 0.001, and the Q-Q plot against the normal distribution was strongly nonlinear. In contrast, the Cauchy distribution (), which has previously been used for ratios of normally distributed variables (27), gave a close approximation over the entire range with parameters: x0 = 1.007, and γ = 0.865. The Cauchy distribution has no meaningful mean or variance values, but the median and mode are both equal to x0. Given the single transcriptome data from each condition, and the nature of the ratio distribution, it was impossible to assign statistical significance to individual transcript ratios. Instead, we arbitrarily selected extreme low and high ratios in the cumulative distribution function () from the lowest and highest 5% of the fitted distribution. All other ratios were not considered to be different from the expected distribution around 1.0.

Transcripts Affected by Noise Exposure

Transcripts with abundance ratios outside the 5% limits of both tails of the distribution are shown in Fig. 3. Table 2 lists the numerical values of the eight transcripts that we identified as increased by noise exposure. The list includes four endocuticle structural glycoprotein genes, and we note that another member of this gene group (SgAbd4, code: SCH_0144) fell just below the 5% list. The two most elevated transcripts encode a chemosensory protein precursor and a chemosensory protein. Completing the list are one of the four Na+/H+ exchangers that we found, and a lysozyme-like transcript.
Figure 3.

Transcripts at the two tails of the abundance distribution. Numerical values of the abundance ratios are given in Tables 2 and 3. Upper group have ratios above 95% of the cumulative distribution, and lower group have ratios below 5%. Dashed line shows the expected ratio of 1.0 for a transcript unaffected by noise exposure. SgAbd genes are members of the cuticular structural glycoprotein family. Na+/H+ indicates a sodium/proton ion exchanger. Transcripts with identical gene names have different nucleotide sequences and amino acid sequences (no overlapping reads) but matched genes with the same putative identity by BLAST search.

Table 2.

Schistocerca gregaria mRNA transcripts having increased abundance in noise-exposed animals (abundance ratios >95% of all transcripts)

ID CodeNoise/ControlPutative Function
SCH_01451.689Endocuticle structural glycoprotein SgAbd 3
SCH_00291.799Na/H Exchanger
SCH_00921.947Endocuticle structural glycoprotein SgAbd 2
SCH_04472.180Endocuticle structural glycoprotein SgAbd 2
SCH_04482.546Endocuticle structural glycoprotein SgAbd 8
SCH_03872.996Lysozyme-like
SCH_03503.020Chemosensory protein
SCH_03243.038Chemosensory protein precursor
Transcripts at the two tails of the abundance distribution. Numerical values of the abundance ratios are given in Tables 2 and 3. Upper group have ratios above 95% of the cumulative distribution, and lower group have ratios below 5%. Dashed line shows the expected ratio of 1.0 for a transcript unaffected by noise exposure. SgAbd genes are members of the cuticular structural glycoprotein family. Na+/H+ indicates a sodium/proton ion exchanger. Transcripts with identical gene names have different nucleotide sequences and amino acid sequences (no overlapping reads) but matched genes with the same putative identity by BLAST search.
Table 3.

Schistocerca gregaria mRNA transcripts having reduced abundance in noise-exposed animals (abundance ratios <95% of all transcripts)

ID CodeNoise/ControlPutative Function
SCH_00440.069Carboxylesterase
SCH_04740.071Greglin
SCH_02270.072Vitellogenin B
SCH_02080.072Vitellogenin A
SCH_02280.096Hexamerin-like
SCH_04260.106Timeless
SCH_03620.217Hexamerin-like
SCH_03320.221Hexamerin-like
SCH_02550.255GILT-like
SCH_02330.293Hexamerin-like
SCH_00150.310Apolipophorin precursor
SCH_03970.317Prostatic acid phosphatase
SCH_02150.373Hexamerin-like
SCH_01990.390Troponin
SCH_04670.418Clavesin-1
SCH_02880.427Pancreatic lipase-related protein 2
SCH_02470.444Gamma butyrobetaine dioxygenase
SCH_01630.457Myosin heavy chain
Schistocerca gregaria mRNA transcripts having increased abundance in noise-exposed animals (abundance ratios >95% of all transcripts) Table 3 lists the 18 transcripts that were most reduced by noise exposure. The list contains several genes associated with lipid storage and transport (vitellogenins, apolipophorin, gamma butyrobetaine dioxygenase, and pancreatic lipase-related protein). Also reduced were transcripts for protein storage (hexamerins), muscle (troponin and myosin), neuron-related proteins (clavesin and timeless), plus several enzymes with a range of possible functions (carboxylesterase, greglin, GILT-like, and prostatic acid phosphatase). Schistocerca gregaria mRNA transcripts having reduced abundance in noise-exposed animals (abundance ratios <95% of all transcripts)

Transcription Factors Related to Sound Sensation

The amino acid sequences of the complete list of 66 possible transcription factors were compared by BLAST against the four genes recently associated with sound transduction in a study of age-related Drosophila deafness (7). No direct orthologs were identified but three Drosophila genes, optix, worniu, and amos, had amino acid sequences with more than 55% identity to locust transcripts (Table 4).
Table 4.

Drosophila genes linked to age related deafness (7) with the most similar transcripts from Table 1

Drosophila NameGenBank CodeLocust ID, NameIdentical/Similar
OptixNP_524695.2SCH_0489, Six157% / 74%
WorniuNP_476601.1SCH_0168, Scratch58% / 69%
AmosALC39557.1SCH_0488, Dimmed54% / 76%

Notes: Alternate names for optix are Dmel and Six3. Alternate names for amos are helix-loop-helix, absent MD neurons, reduced olfactory organs, and rough eye. Worniu also matches many zinc finger transcription factors with lower similarity.

Drosophila genes linked to age related deafness (7) with the most similar transcripts from Table 1 Notes: Alternate names for optix are Dmel and Six3. Alternate names for amos are helix-loop-helix, absent MD neurons, reduced olfactory organs, and rough eye. Worniu also matches many zinc finger transcription factors with lower similarity.

DISCUSSION

We cannot claim to have identified every gene transcript in Müller’s organ whose abundance was changed by noise exposure, but genes participating in most major functions were probably found. We might have failed to identify very low abundance transcripts, but we saw abundance values over almost 5 log units and in all the expected major functional groups.

Abundance Ratio Distributions and the Significance of Ratio Measurements

Changes in gene transcript abundance provide an important window into processes such as cancer development, aging, drug therapies, sensory stimulation, etc. and are encouraged by the increasing quality and availability of transcriptome data. But how significant are measured abundance ratios, compared to the experimental variability? A review of approaches to abundance ratio analysis, primarily for human cancer work, pointed out that reads are not often uniformly distributed along transcripts, and that total transcriptome reads from each gene provide an important, often ignored measure (28). We based our approach on the previous finding that counting all the reads matching the coding frame gave relative abundance values that agreed with quantitative PCR measurements (26). The Cauchy distribution (27) can arise from the ratio of two normally distributed random variables with zero means. In the current situation, we had only single measurements of each abundance (control and noise exposed), but it is reasonable to assume that many independently made transcriptomes, each with multiple steps between tissue and final sequencing, would produce normally distributed abundance values for each transcript. This issue is worth exploring when multiple repeated transcriptomes become more feasible. The shape of the Cauchy distribution implies that relatively large changes in gene expression ratios are difficult to interpret. For example, a 50% change might be impressive on a bar graph but would only fall within the expected range of Fig. 2. This could have important consequences for interpreting the increasing amount of transcriptome data encountered in clinical and experimental work.

Changes in the Mechanical Properties of Müller’s Organ

The two most strongly increased transcripts (Fig. 3, Table 2) encode chemosensory proteins. Although this family is eponymously involved in chemical sensation, they are widespread across tissues and phyla, with a range of functions based on binding to lipids (29). They have also been associated with development and modification of the integument (30). This agrees with the finding that four of the other increased transcripts encode structural glycoproteins that are used to construct the endocuticle layer of the integument. Increased expression of homologous transcripts in different termite castes was associated with increased thickness and hardness of the endocuticle (31), so noise exposure probably caused a thicker, harder tympanum. Another increased transcript was a lysozyme-like. These enzymes break glycosidic bonds, including those in chitin, supporting the picture of cuticle remodeling. However, apolipophorins are also involved in cuticular construction (32) and some of these were substantially reduced (Fig. 3). Insect ears, like human ears, use active movement to improve sensitivity (6, 7). Our previous study found that noise exposure caused increased displacement of the tympanum by sound (3) and suggested three possible causes for this based on active and passive components of the sensilla, plus possible muscle attachments. We must now add changes in the cuticle of the tympanum, or possibly its supporting structures. Solitary locusts (8) had larger tympanal movement over a wide frequency range, but stronger neural responses only to high frequencies (15–20 kHz), whereas aged locusts had lower neural responses that were not correlated with tympanal movement (33), so the relationship between tympanal movement and sensory response is not straightforward. Aged Drosophila ears had less mechanical gain and reduced stiffness, which was used to predict a 50% reduction in functioning mechanically activated ion channels (7). However, no changes in the passive mechanical structures were recorded. Two muscle protein transcripts, troponin and myosin heavy chain, were reduced by noise exposure (Fig. 3, Table 3). Myosin light chain was also reduced but slightly less. Therefore, reduced muscle tension is another candidate for increased tympanal compliance. Although a softer tympanum might be expected to move more easily, a stiffer tympanum might resist flexion between different regions of the cuticle, leading to greater movement at Müller’s organ. Resolution of these issues could be helped by recording from or manipulation of tympanal muscle to determine its contributions to passive and active tympanal movement. A better understanding of the frequency dependent mechanical properties of the complex tympanal structure is also desirable (22).

Metabolic Consequences of Noise Exposure

The most strongly reduced transcripts (Fig. 3) were from genes associated with cellular metabolism (vitellogenins, apolipophorin, gamma butyrobetaine dioxygenase, pancreatic lipase-related protein, and hexamerins), as well as enzymes that could support a wide range of cellular processes (carboxylesterase, greglin, GILT-like, and prostatic acid phosphatase). Neurons are active cells, particularly because action potentials consume considerable energy (34). Stimulation with a loud sound for 24 h presumably generated many action potentials in Müller’s organ. Noise exposure also produced metabolic stress in Drosophila auditory neurons (2), including changes in mitochondrial structure. Turnover of mRNA transcripts is a complex process (35). Transcripts have half-lives ranging from a few minutes to many hours, and numerous mechanisms have been identified that degrade and modify mRNA. Stressed cells are known to reduce general protein synthesis, including aggregation of mRNA into granules targeted for storage or degradation. The duration of noise stimulation here was clearly adequate to initiate or interact with some of these processes. However, it is impossible to tell from the current evidence whether the broad reduction in transcripts supporting cell metabolism reflects feedback processes to protect the tissue from overstimulation, or exhaustion of the cell’s energy production mechanisms. Similarly, we do not yet know if the reduced metabolic capacity caused changes in auditory functions, such as ionic concentrations or muscle contractility.

Sensory Receptor Currents in Müller’s Organ

Previous experiments found normal membrane electrophysiology in noise-exposed sensory neurons, including the action potentials produced by sound or electrical stimulation (3). However, receptor current was significantly reduced. This suggests that sound exposure does not change general ionic concentrations but does affect mechanically activated ion channels or the transepithelial ion and voltage gradients (19) that drive the current. No reduction was seen in any of the transcripts from seven putative mechanically activated ion channels, confirming previous data (3). That leaves reduced transepithelial gradients as a possibility. Insect epithelial ion transport involves several ion pumps, exchangers, and channels but is incompletely characterized (20). Although we found 32 transcripts of ion transporters and pumps, plus 24 ion channels, the only change caused by noise exposure was the increased abundance of one Na+/H+ exchanger (Fig. 3, Table 2). This sequence matches insect genes identified as exchanger 9B2, possibly of mitochondrial origin. However, all those sequences were predicted by genomic transcriptions, without any functions or tissue location. The present data support our previous suggestion of reduced transepithelial gradients (3) but indicate that it arises indirectly from a loss of transcripts responsible for general cellular energy production. Reduction in noise-exposed Drosophila auditory receptor potential was also attributed to reduced metabolic capacity (2). Two additional neural transcripts were reduced by noise exposure. Clavesins are Golgi apparatus proteins involved in vesicular trafficking (36). This may have been reduced by the overall metabolic effect. Timeless (37) is a component of the circadian mechanism but also involved in DNA replication and repair. Noise stimulation for 24 h probably disrupted circadian maintenance of this transcript.

What Drives the Noise-Induced Transcriptional Changes?

Transcription factors (TF) were implicated in an insect model of aged deafness (7), and mammalian TFs rescued insect hearing (38). The lack of TFs in the lists of affected transcripts is surprising. Orthopteran TFs are not well described. A review of insect TFs (39) listed only three in Locusta and two in Schistocerca, compared to 117 in Drosophila. Four TFs were identified as age-related regulators of auditory transduction in Drosophila (7), but no locust transcripts matching these (Table 4) were affected by noise exposure. The most strongly affected TF was SCH_0487 (1.526 noise/control). This putatively encodes lipopolysaccharide-induced tumor necrosis factor alpha, which has many possible functions, including in lyzosymes, so this may be linked to the increase in the lysozyme-like transcript.

Models of Deafness

Age and sound exposure can both cause deafness in mammals and insects, but the underlying mechanisms may be different. Age affects more physiological processes, and probably gene transcripts, than sound alone, making interactions between different systems possible. However, the limited data suggest that both mechanical coupling of sound and transduction of receptor current are usually involved. The recent description of the complete Schistocerca genome (40) promises to allow more structured studies of this interesting model of deafness.

GRANTS

This work is supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada Grant RGPIN/03712 to A. S. French and Leverhulme Trust Early Career Fellowship and a Wellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support Fund Fellowship awarded to B. Warren. B. Warren was also supported by the Department of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behavior at the University of Leicester.

DISCLOSURES

No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the authors.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

A.S.F. and B.W. conceived and designed research; B.W. performed experiments; A.S.F. analyzed data; A.S.F. and B.W. interpreted results of experiments; A.S.F. prepared figures; A.S.F. drafted manuscript; A.S.F. and B.W. edited and revised manuscript; A.S.F. and B.W. approved final version of manuscript.
  32 in total

1.  Nanoscale organization of the MEC-4 DEG/ENaC sensory mechanotransduction channel in Caenorhabditis elegans touch receptor neurons.

Authors:  Juan G Cueva; Atticus Mulholland; Miriam B Goodman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Hearing ability decreases in ageing locusts.

Authors:  Shira D Gordon; James F C Windmill
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  RNAi-induced phenotypes suggest a novel role for a chemosensory protein CSP5 in the development of embryonic integument in the honeybee (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  J Maleszka; S Forêt; R Saint; R Maleszka
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 0.900

4.  Genetic dissection of mechanosensory transduction: mechanoreception-defective mutations of Drosophila.

Authors:  M Kernan; D Cowan; C Zuker
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Conserved regions of the timeless (tim) clock gene in Drosophila analyzed through phylogenetic and functional studies.

Authors:  A Ousley; K Zafarullah; Y Chen; M Emerson; L Hickman; A Sehgal
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Piezo proteins are pore-forming subunits of mechanically activated channels.

Authors:  Bertrand Coste; Bailong Xiao; Jose S Santos; Ruhma Syeda; Jörg Grandl; Kathryn S Spencer; Sung Eun Kim; Manuela Schmidt; Jayanti Mathur; Adrienne E Dubin; Mauricio Montal; Ardem Patapoutian
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-02-19       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Hearing in Drosophila.

Authors:  Jörg T Albert; Martin C Göpfert
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2015-02-22       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  Listening to the environment: hearing differences from an epigenetic effect in solitarious and gregarious locusts.

Authors:  Shira D Gordon; Joseph C Jackson; Stephen M Rogers; James F C Windmill
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Transcriptome analysis and RNA interference of cockroach phototransduction indicate three opsins and suggest a major role for TRPL channels.

Authors:  Andrew S French; Shannon Meisner; Hongxia Liu; Matti Weckström; Päivi H Torkkeli
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  The Role of the Mechanotransduction Ion Channel Candidate Nanchung-Inactive in Auditory Transduction in an Insect Ear.

Authors:  Ben Warren; Tom Matheson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  1 in total

1.  Physiological changes throughout an insect ear due to age and noise - A longitudinal study.

Authors:  Alix Blockley; Daisy Ogle; Charlie Woodrow; Fernando Montealegre-Z; Ben Warren
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-07-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.