Literature DB >> 33948886

Ultrasound-guided pediatric vascular cannulation by inexperienced operators: outcomes in a training model.

José Manuel López-Álvarez1,2, Olivia Pérez-Quevedo3, Joaquín Naya-Esteban4,5, Teresa Ramirez-Lorenzo6, Juan Carlos Falcón-González5, Dionisio Lorenzo Lorenzo-Villegas5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To present the results of an ultrasound vascular cannulation (UGVC) training program for inexperienced operators using a training model.
METHOD: This was a descriptive observational study developed in the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of a third-level hospital. Operators received basic theoretical training in the USVC technique, followed by practical training with a model designed for USVC-inexperienced healthcare professionals.
RESULTS: The study included 25 healthcare professionals, who carried out a total of 300 ultrasound-guided cannulation procedures (12 per participant) at equidistant sites on the longitudinal axis/in-plane (LA/IP) and the transverse axis/out-of-plane (TA/OP). The mean depth of cannulated vessels was 0.90 (0.34) cm and their mean diameter was 0.41 (0.1) cm. In 41.7% of cases, complete view of the needle (CVN) was accomplished; in 49% of cases, repositioning of the needle/guidewire (RNG) was necessary for successful UGVC. The rate of successful UGVC in the training model was 79.7%. The mean time required for the procedure was 74.70 (73.72) seconds. The time to successful cannulation was 58.72 (56.87) seconds. The mean number of attempts needed until successful UGVC was 1.31 (0.72). Complications were: (a) 26.3% vessel perforation/wrong guidewire positioning (VP/WGP) and (b) 4.3% successful vessel puncture followed by failure to accomplish subsequent cannulation.
CONCLUSIONS: Through the present theoretical-practical training program for inexperienced operators using a training model: (a) high success rates and short procedural times were attained; (b) complete view of needle and need for repositioning the needle/guidewire occurred in half of the procedures; and (c) complications occurred in a third of the procedures.
© 2021. Società Italiana di Ultrasonologia in Medicina e Biologia (SIUMB).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Paediatrics; Simulation; Ultrasound; Vascular access

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33948886      PMCID: PMC9148336          DOI: 10.1007/s40477-021-00585-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound        ISSN: 1876-7931


  44 in total

Review 1.  Needle-related ultrasound artifacts and their importance in anaesthetic practice.

Authors:  G Reusz; P Sarkany; J Gal; A Csomos
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  An Inexpensive and Easy Ultrasound Phantom: A Novel Use for SPAM.

Authors:  Laura Nolting; Patrick Hunt; Thomas Cook; Barton Douglas
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 3.  Ultrasound-guided vascular access in critical illness.

Authors:  G A Schmidt; M Blaivas; S A Conrad; F Corradi; S Koenig; M Lamperti; B Saugel; W Schummer; M Slama
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Short-axis/out-of-plane or long-axis/in-plane ultrasound-guided arterial cannulation in children: A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  In-Kyung Song; Jung-Yoon Choi; Ji-Hyun Lee; Eun-Hee Kim; Hyun-Jung Kim; Hee-Soo Kim; Jin-Tae Kim
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Ultrasound visual image-guided vs Doppler auditory-assisted radial artery cannulation in infants and small children by non-expert anaesthesiologists: a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  K Ueda; S Puangsuvan; M A Hove; E O Bayman
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  What you see (sonographically) is what you get: vein and patient characteristics associated with successful ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous placement in patients with difficult access.

Authors:  Nova L Panebianco; Jenna M Fredette; Demian Szyld; Emily B Sagalyn; Jesse M Pines; Anthony J Dean
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 3.451

7.  Handheld Ultrasound: Overcoming the Challenge of Difficult Peripheral Intravenous Access in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Josie Acuña; Jacob Sorenson; Anthony Gades; Ryan Wyatt; Nicholas Stea; Maili Drachman; Srikar Adhikari
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 8.  Ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement: a structured review and recommendations for clinical practice.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Thomas W L Scheeren; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Risk factors for difficult peripheral venous cannulation in hospitalised patients. Protocol for a multicentre case-control study in 48 units of eight public hospitals in Spain.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Rodriguez-Calero; Ismael Fernandez-Fernandez; Luis Javier Molero-Ballester; Catalina Matamalas-Massanet; Luis Moreno-Mejias; Joan Ernest de Pedro-Gomez; Ian Blanco-Mavillard; Jose Miguel Morales-Asencio
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Pediatrician performed point-of-care ultrasound for the detection of ingested foreign bodies: case series and review of the literature.

Authors:  Danilo Buonsenso; Antonio Chiaretti; Antonietta Curatola; Rosa Morello; Martina Giacalone; Niccolò Parri
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2020-03-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.