| Literature DB >> 33948561 |
Aishah Nasir1, Alice Cardall1, Ramadhan T Othman1, Niovi Nicolaou2, Anbarasu Lourdusamy1, Franziska Linke1, David Onion3, Marina Ryzhova4, Hanna Cameron1, Cara Valente1, Alison Ritchie2, Andrey Korshunov5, Stefan M Pfister6, Anna M Grabowska2, Ian D Kerr3, Beth Coyle1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Therapeutic intervention in metastatic medulloblastoma is dependent on elucidating the underlying metastatic mechanism. We investigated whether an epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-like pathway could drive medulloblastoma metastasis.Entities:
Keywords: 3D-BME model; ABCB1; Harmine; TWIST1; epithelial–mesenchymal transition; medulloblastoma
Year: 2021 PMID: 33948561 PMCID: PMC8080134 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdab030
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurooncol Adv ISSN: 2632-2498
Figure 1.Cell growth and morphology in the 3D-BME model. Non-tumorigenic (FB83 and C17.2), non-metastatic (MED6 and UW228-3), and metastatic (MED1, D458Med, and D283Med) cell lines were cultured in the 3D-BME model. (A) Metabolic activity was assessed with the AlamarBlue metabolic assay to determine the arbitrary fluorescent units (AFU; n ≥ 2). One-way ANOVA statistical tests shown were compared with MED1 (denoted in black), FB83 (denoted in red), and UW228-3 (denoted in blue) at days 3 and 6 (*P ≤ .05, **P ≤ .001, ***P ≤ .0005, and ****P ≤ .0001). (B) Morphology with time-lapse images taken at ×10 magnification (scale bars represent 100 µm).
Figure 2.Investigating the metastatic marker WIP1 in the 3D-BME model. (A) Relative gene expression of WIP1 was assessed in 2D and 3D samples of medulloblastoma cell lines normalized against GAPDH using the 2−ΔCt method (one-way ANOVA analysis with Tukey’s multiple comparisons post-hoc test; *P ≤ .05 and ***P ≤ .001; n = 3). (B–D) D283Med were exposed to CCT007093 (0.5 µM and 5 µM), vehicle (0.1% DMSO), or untreated at days 0–3 in the 3D-BME model. (B) Metabolic activity was assessed with the AlamarBlue metabolic assay for each condition (n = 3). (C) Time-lapse images of vehicle (black arrows denote cell aggregates) and treated D283Med cells at ×10 magnification (scale bars represent 100 µm). (D) The mean aggregate area of D283Med was quantified relative to day 0 (using the open-source FIJI software) from time-lapse images (n = 3).
Figure 3.TWIST1 expression and functional analysis. (A) Relative gene expression of TWIST1 was assessed in 2D and 3D samples of 3 medulloblastoma cell lines and normalized against GAPDH using the 2−ΔCt method. (B) Representative images of nuclear TWIST1 IHC staining of MED1 and (C) MED6 patient tumor tissue at ×20 magnification (scale bars represent 50 µm). (D) Nuclear TWIST1 IHC staining of Nottingham and Birmingham TMA’s was scored and correlated with metastatic status (M0/M+) in 70 patients (>3 years old; Pearson’s chi-squared exact test; P = .027). (E) High TWIST1 expression correlated to adverse EFS in Kaplan–Meier curves of Nottingham and Birmingham TMA’s (Log-rank test; P = .046). (F) Bioluminescent images (obtained at 60 s exposure time) of brain and spinal cord tumors at 21 days after implanting MED1-Fluc cells into the mouse cerebellum. (G and H) Nuclear TWIST1 IHC staining of horizontal sections of the (G) brain and (H) right dorsal ganglia tumor of the spinal cord taken at ×4 and ×20 magnification (scale bars shown represent 50 µm). (I) MED6 and MED6-TWIST1 morphology with time-lapse images taken at ×10 magnification (scale bars represent 100 µm). (J and K) TWIST1 was inhibited in D283Med and ONS-76 cell lines using (J) shRNA or (K) Harmine (D283Med: 5 µM and ONS-76: 20 µM) for 72 h, before plating (1 × 105 cells/insert) onto a Collagen IV and Laminin coated transwell insert. Migrating cells were compared to either a non-targeting shRNA or DMSO control (paired Student’s t-test *P ≤ .05, **P ≤ .01; n ≥ 2).
Figure 4.TWIST1 regulates ABCB1. (A) Membranous ABCB1 IHC staining of DKFZ TMA and Nottingham TMA was scored and correlated with metastatic status (M0/M+) in a total of 259 patients (Pearson’s chi-squared exact test P = .04). (B) Schematic of the E-box binding site in the Exon 3 promoter region of ABCB1. (C) ChIP qPCR analysis of the promoter regions in GAPDH, SNAI2, and ABCB1, showing enrichment with TWIST1 antibody for GAPDH and ABCB1 compared with IgG antibody control. Data are expressed as a percentage of the input (paired Student’s t-test *P ≤ .05; n ≥ 3). (D and E) MED6 and MED6-TWIST1 (2.6 × 104 cells/well) cells were treated with vardenafil (10 µM) or vehicle (H20) at days 0–4 in the 3D-BME model. (D) Time-lapse images were taken at ×10 magnification (scale bars represent 100 µm). (E) The mean aggregate area was quantified from time-lapse images taken between days 0 and 4 (unpaired t-test with Sidak–Bonferroni correction *P ≤ .05; n ≥ 2).