| Literature DB >> 33947805 |
Per Hydbring1, Juan Du2, Liqin Cheng3, Dominika Kaźmierczak4, Johanna Norenhag5, Marica Hamsten3, Emma Fransson3,5, Ina Schuppe-Koistinen3,6, Matts Olovsson5, Lars Engstrand3,6.
Abstract
The vaginal microbiota plays an essential role in vaginal health. The vaginas of many reproductive-age women are dominated by one of the Lactobacillus species. However, the vaginas of a large number of women are characterized by the colonization of several other anaerobes. Notably, some women with the non-Lactobacillus-dominated vaginal microbiota develop bacterial vaginosis, which has been correlated with sexually transmitted infections and other adverse outcomes. However, interactions and mechanisms linking the vaginal microbiota to host response are still under investigation. There are studies suggesting a link between human microRNAs and gut microbiota, but limited analysis has been carried out on the interplay of microRNAs and vaginal microbiota. In this study, we performed a microRNA expression array profiling on 67 vaginal samples from young Swedish women. MicroRNAs were clustered into distinct groups according to vaginal microbiota composition. Interestingly, 182 microRNAs were significantly elevated in their expression in the non-Lactobacillus-dominated community, suggesting an antagonistic relationship between Lactobacillus and microRNAs. Of the elevated microRNAs, 10 microRNAs displayed excellent diagnostic potential, visualized by receiver operating characteristics analysis. We further validated our findings in 34 independent samples where expression of top microRNA candidates strongly separated the Lactobacillus-dominated community from the non-Lactobacillus-dominated community in the vaginal microbiota. Notably, the Lactobacillus crispatus-dominated community showed the most profound differential microRNA expression compared with the non-Lactobacillus-dominated community. In conclusion, we demonstrate a strong relationship between the vaginal microbiota and numerous genital microRNAs, which may facilitate a deeper mechanistic interplay in this biological niche.IMPORTANCE Vaginal microbiota is correlated with women's health, where a non-Lactobacillus-dominated community predisposes women to a higher risk of disease, including human papillomavirus (HPV). However, the molecular relationship between the vaginal microbiota and host is largely unexplored. In this study, we investigated a link between the vaginal microbiota and host microRNAs in a group of young women. We uncovered an inverse correlation of the expression of microRNAs with the abundance of Lactobacillus species in the vaginal microbiota. Particularly, the expression of microRNA miR-23a-3p and miR-130a-3p, displaying significantly elevated levels in non-Lactobacillus-dominated communities, predicted the bacterial composition of the vaginal microbiota in an independent validation group. Since targeting of microRNAs is explored in the clinical setting, our results warrant investigation of whether microRNA modulation could be used for treating vaginosis recurrence and vaginosis-related diseases. Conversely, commensal bacteria could be used for treating diseases with microRNA aberrations.Entities:
Keywords: Lactobacillus-dominated; human papillomavirus; microRNAs; non-Lactobacillus-dominated; vaginal microbiota
Year: 2021 PMID: 33947805 PMCID: PMC8269211 DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00175-21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mSystems ISSN: 2379-5077 Impact factor: 6.496
FIG 1Differential analysis of miRNA expression. (A) Hierarchical clustering analysis of miRNA expression in Lactobacillus-dominated samples versus non-Lactobacillus-dominated samples, human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive samples versus HPV-negative samples, and different status considering only high-risk (HR) HPV types. Color scale depicts standard deviations from the mean of each row. hsa, Homo sapiens. (B) Volcano plot of downregulated and upregulated miRNAs in Lactobacillus-dominated samples compared with non-Lactobacillus-dominated samples. The significantly changed miRNAs (>2-fold; false discovery rate: FDR < 0.01) are marked in red color.
FIG 2(A to J) Scatterplots of the 10 most differentially expressed miRNAs in Lactobacillus-dominated samples versus non-Lactobacillus-dominated samples. Data are presented as medians with interquartile ranges (error bars) on a log10 scale of normalized expression counts. ****, P value of <0.0001.
FIG 3(A to J) Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves of the 10 most differentially expressed miRNAs in Lactobacillus-dominated samples versus non-Lactobacillus-dominated samples. Values for area under curve (AUC) are displayed in each plot, as a measure of the diagnostic potential of each miRNA.
FIG 4Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis of miR-23a-3p and miR-130a-3p predicted target genes. (A) Dot plot of the KEGG pathways ranked according to the numbers of miR-23a-3p and miR-130a-3p predicted target genes (TargetScan 7.2) in each pathway. The color of each dot reflects the level of statistical significance. The size of the dots reflects the number of miRNA-predicted target genes in each pathway. (B) The interaction network of miR-23a-3p and miR-130a-3p, their respective predicted target genes (TargetScan 7.2), and the top 10 KEGG pathways from panel A.
FIG 5Validation of miR-23a-3p and miR-130a-3p expression in Lactobacillus-dominated samples versus non-Lactobacillus-dominated samples from a distinct group of vaginal samples. (A) Hierarchical clustering of miR-23a-3p and miR-130a-3p expression in Lactobacillus-dominated samples versus non-Lactobacillus-dominated samples. The color scale depicts standard deviations from the mean of each row. (B and C) Scatterplots displaying the association between miR-23a-3p and miR-130a-3p expression with Lactobacillus species abundance. (D and E) Comparison of miR-23a-3p and miR-130a-3p expression in Lactobacillus-dominated samples versus non-Lactobacillus-dominated samples. Data are presented as median with interquartile range on a log10 scale. y-axis values depict the percentage of expression in relation to U6 snRNA. ****, P value of <0.0001.