| Literature DB >> 33947802 |
Elwira Sieniawska1, Rafal Sawicki2, Wieslaw Truszkiewicz2, Andrey S Marchev3,4, Milen I Georgiev3,4.
Abstract
Mycobacterium tuberculosis developed efficient adaptation mechanisms in response to different environmental conditions. This resulted in the ability to survive in human macrophages and in resistance to numerous antibiotics. To get insight into bacterial responses to potent antimycobacterial natural compounds, we tested how usnic acid, a lichen-derived secondary metabolite, would influence mycobacteria at transcriptomic and metabolomic levels. The analysis of expression of sigma factors revealed a profound impact of usnic acid on one of the primary genetic regulatory systems of M. tuberculosis Combined liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance analyses allowed us to observe the perturbations in metabolic pathways, as well as in lipid composition, which took place within 24 h of exposure. Early bacterial response was related to redox homeostasis, lipid synthesis, and nucleic acid repair. Usnic acid treatment provoked disturbances of redox state in mycobacterial cells and increased production of structural elements of the cell wall and cell membrane. In addition, to increase the number of molecules related to restoration of redox balance, the rearrangements of the cell envelope were the first defense mechanisms observed under usnic acid treatment.IMPORTANCE The evaluation of mechanisms of mycobacterial response to natural products has been barely studied. However, it might be helpful to reveal bacterial adaptation strategies, which are eventually crucial for the discovery of new drug targets and, hence, understanding the resistance mechanisms. This study showed that the first-line mycobacterial defense against usnic acid, a potent antimicrobial agent, is the remodeling of the cell envelope and restoring redox homeostasis. Transcriptomic data correlated with metabolomics analysis. The observed metabolic changes appeared similar to those exerted by antibiotics.Entities:
Keywords: LC-MS; NMR; lipids; metabolomics; natural products; sigma factors; stress response
Year: 2021 PMID: 33947802 PMCID: PMC8269206 DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00097-21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mSystems ISSN: 2379-5077 Impact factor: 6.496
Activity network/connections obtained for bacteria under usnic acid treatment
| KEGG pathway and metabolite | Total | No. of hits, direction of fold change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pyrimidine deoxyribonucleotide | 4 | 4 | 0.0002 |
| CDP | 45.6, up | ||
| CTP | 2.3, up | ||
| dCDP | 385.4, up | ||
| dUTP | 2.1, up | ||
| CMP phosphorylation | 3 | 2 | 0.00562 |
| CDP | 45.6, up | ||
| CTP | 2.3, up | ||
| Pyrimidine deoxyribonucleotide dephosphorylation | 2 | 2 | 0.00222 |
| 5-Hydroxy-CTP | 1.7, up | ||
| dUTP | 2.1, up | ||
| Purine deoxyribonucleoside degradation I | 4 | 2 | 0.01172 |
| 2′-Deoxyguanosine | 2.7, down | ||
| Adenine | 1.6, down | ||
| 2 | 2 | 0.00222 | |
| Adenine | 1.6, down | ||
| | 1.6, down | ||
| Adenine and adenosine salvage III | 4 | 2 | 0.01566 |
| Adenine | 1.6, down | ||
| Inosine | 2.3, down | ||
| Flavin biosynthesis I (bacteria and plants) | 2 | 2 | 0.00617 |
| FMN | 125.8, up | ||
| Riboflavin | 37.0, up | ||
| Factor 420 biosynthesis | 4 | 2 | 0.01172 |
| 7,8-Didemethyl-8-hydroxy-5-deazariboflavin | 68.2, up | ||
| 5,10-Methylene-tetrahydromethanopterin | 308.6, up | ||
| Arginine biosynthesis II (acetyl cycle) | 4 | 2 | 0.01172 |
| AMP | 1.4, up | ||
| 9.3, up | |||
| Adenosylcobalamin biosynthesis from cobyrinate | 5 | 2 | 0.02109 |
| FMN | 125.8, up | ||
| Nicotinate | 1.6, up | ||
| Cob(II)yrinate | 5 | 2 | 0.02296 |
| Precorrin-8x | 7.2, up | ||
| 12.9, up | |||
| Mycolate biosynthesis | 6 | 2 | 0.03215 |
| CoA | 12.1, up | ||
| 12.9, up |
FIG 1Number of dysregulated lipids with breakdown for classes and subclasses. (A) Fatty acyls, glycerolipids, prenol lipids, polyketides, and saccharolipid class. (B) Glycerophospholipids. α-MA, mycolic acids; MBFA, methyl branched fatty acids; m-MA, metoxy mycolic acids; PDIM, phthiocerol dimycocerosates; GMM, glucose monomycolates; TMM, trehalose monomycolates; MG, monoacylglycerols; DG, diacylglycerols; TG, triacylglycerols; MPM, mannosyl-b1-phosphomycoketides; DAT, diacyltrehaloses; Ac2SGL, diacylated sulfolipid; PI, diacylglycerophosphoinositols; AcPIMs, acylated diacylglycerophosphoinositolmannosides; Lyso-GP, monoacylglycerophosphoglycerols; PIMs, diacylglycerophosphoinositolmannosides; Lyso-PIMs, monoacylglycerophosphoinositolmannosides; PG, diacylglycerophosphoglycerols; Lyso-PE, monoacylglycerolphosphoethanolamines; Lyso-PI, monoacylglycerophosphoinositols; PE, diacylglycerolphosphoethanolamines; CL, diacylglycerophosphoglycerophosphodiradylglycerols.
FIG 21H NMR (600 MHz) spectra of M. tuberculosis H37Ra control samples (DH) and samples treated with usnic acid (UAH). The residual signals of solvents and usnic acid were removed from the spectrum.
Chemical shifts (δ) and coupling constants (J) of the metabolites, identified by their relevant 1H NMR spectra
| Metabolite (reference[s]) | Chemical shift (ppm) | Coupling constant (Hz) | DH | UAH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amino acid | ||||
| Alanine ( | 1.49 | (d, | + | + |
| Glutamine ( | 2.14/2.39 | (m)/(m) | ++ | + |
| Leucine ( | 0.98/0.99/3.73 | (d, | + | + |
| Proline ( | 4.13/2.40/2.12/2.05/3.34/3.41 | (dd, | ++ | + |
| Serine ( | 3.98 | (m) | ++ | + |
| Threonine ( | 1.33 | (d, | + | + |
| Valine ( | 1.01/1.07 | (d, | + | + |
| Carbohydrate | ||||
| α-Glucose ( | 5.18 | (d, | ++ | + |
| β-Glucose ( | 4.59 | (d, | ++ | + |
| Galactose ( | 5.15 | (d, | + | + |
| Raffinose ( | 5.49 | (d, | + | + |
| Xylose ( | 3.41/3.63/4.60/5.19 | (t, | ++ | + |
| Organic acid | ||||
| Formic acid ( | 8.47 | (s) | ++ | + |
| Alcohol | ||||
| Glycerol ( | 3.54/3.56/3.58/3.60 | (d, | ++ | + |
| Other | ||||
| Choline ( | 3.22 | (s) | − | + |
| Dimethylamine ( | 2.72 | (s) | +++ | + |
| γ-Amino-butyrate (GABA) ( | 1.90/2.30/3.01 | (m)/(t, | ++ | + |
| Lecithin ( | 3.12 | (s) | + | − |
| Inosine monophosphate ( | 8.25/8.61 | (s)/(s) | ++ | + |
DH, control (cells + DMSO); UAH, samples treated with usnic acid. Plus and minus signs indicate the presence and absence of metabolite; + to +++ indicate semiquantitative information via relative signal intensity comparison.
FIG 3(A) Orthogonal projections to latent structures discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) statistical model of M. tuberculosis H37Ra control- and usnic acid-treated samples based on the spectral region δ 0.0 to 3.0 ppm. (B) Representative S-line based on the OPLS-DA model between the control and usnic acid-treated samples. All signals have positive values, revealing that the molecules in this region are present in larger amounts in the control samples.
FIG 4Relative expression change of sigA, sigB, and sigB genes after 24 h of exposure to an effective dose (512 μl/ml) of usnic acid, normalized to 16SmRNA (control). Standard deviations are included as a thin bar.
Primers used for qPCR analyses
| Gene | Primer pair (5′–3′) |
|---|---|
| Fwd, | |
| Rev, | |
| Fwd, | |
| Rev, | |
| Fwd, | |
| Rev, | |
| 16S RNA | Fwd, |
| Rev, |