Literature DB >> 33947783

Impact of the Surgical Approach to Thymectomy Upon Complete Stable Remission Rates in Myasthenia Gravis: A Meta-analysis.

Paola Solis-Pazmino1, Ioana Baiu1, Eddy Lincango-Naranjo1, Winston Trope1, Larry Prokop1, Oscar J Ponce1, Joseph B Shrager2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the available operative techniques for thymectomy in myasthenia gravis (MG) confer variable chances for achieving complete stable remission (CSR), we performed a meta-analysis of comparative studies of surgical approaches to thymectomy.
METHODS: Meta-analysis was done of all studies providing comparative data on thymectomy approaches, with CSR reported and minimum 3-year mean follow-up.
RESULTS: Twelve cohort studies and 1 randomized clinical trial, containing 1,598 patients, met entry criteria. At 3 years, CSR from MG was similar after video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) extended vs both basic (relative risk [RR] 1.00, p = 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39-2.58) and extended (RR 0.96, p = 0.74, 95% CI 0.72-1.27) transsternal approaches. CSR at 3 years was also similar after extended transsternal vs combined transcervical-subxiphoid (RR 1.08, p = 0.62, 95% CI 0.8-1.44) approaches. VATS extended approaches remained statistically equivalent to extended transsternal approaches through 9 years of follow-up (RR 1.51, p = 0.05, 95% CI 0.99-2.30). The only significant difference in CSR rate between a traditional open and a minimally invasive approach was seen at 10 years when the now-abandoned basic (non-sternum-lifting) transcervical approach was compared to the extended transsternal approach (RR 0.4, p = 0.01, 95% CI 0.2-0.8).
CONCLUSIONS: A significant difference in the rate of CSR among various surgical approaches for thymectomy in MG was identified only at long-term follow-up and only between what might be considered the most aggressive approach (extended transsternal thymectomy) and the least aggressive approach (basic transcervical thymectomy). Extended minimally invasive approaches appear to have CSR rates equivalent to those of extended transsternal approaches and are therefore appropriate in the hands of experienced surgeons.
© 2021 American Academy of Neurology.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33947783     DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  3 in total

Review 1.  Robotic Living Donor Right Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Eddy P Lincango Naranjo; Estefany Garces-Delgado; Timo Siepmann; Lutz Mirow; Paola Solis-Pazmino; Harold Alexander-Leon; Gabriela Restrepo-Rodas; Rafael Mancero-Montalvo; Cristina J Ponce; Ramiro Cadena-Semanate; Ronnal Vargas-Cordova; Glenda Herrera-Cevallos; Sebastian Vallejo; Carolina Liu-Sanchez; Larry J Prokop; Ioannis A Ziogas; Michail G Vailas; Alfredo D Guerron; Brendan C Visser; Oscar J Ponce; Andrew S Barbas; Dimitrios Moris
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 2.  Thymectomy in Myasthenia Gravis: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Danah Aljaafari; Noman Ishaque
Journal:  Saudi J Med Med Sci       Date:  2022-04-29

3.  Two-step nationwide epidemiological survey of myasthenia gravis in Japan 2018.

Authors:  Hiroaki Yoshikawa; Yumi Adachi; Yosikazu Nakamura; Nagato Kuriyama; Hiroyuki Murai; Yoshiko Nomura; Yasunari Sakai; Kazuo Iwasa; Yutaka Furukawa; Satoshi Kuwabara; Makoto Matsui
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 3.752

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.