Literature DB >> 33947599

Timing of COVID-19 vaccination in the major burns patient.

Paula F Wrafter1, Donal Murphy2, Philomena Nolan3, Odhran Shelley4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33947599      PMCID: PMC8062435          DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2021.04.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Burns        ISSN: 0305-4179            Impact factor:   2.744


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, The COVID-19 pandemic continues to challenge our healthcare system and impact on burn care delivery [1]. The arrival of the COVID-19 vaccinations offer a strategy to contain the pandemic with vaccine rollout prioritising medically vulnerable patients. Patients with burn injury often have significant comorbidities or acquired organ and immune dysfunction [2]. Such patients may be more vulnerable to subsequent contraction of COVID-19 and potentially have an increased mortality risk. In the unique setting of burn injury there is little evidence of when is the correct time to administer the vaccine. There is a long history of variolation dating back to as early as 430BC [3] with Edward Jenner credited with the first vaccine and subsequent eradicaton of smallpox [4]. In burn care there is an established practice in many countries of tetanus vaccination or immunoglobulin administration in those deemed to have higher risk injury [5]. While there are recommendations on the CDC website for immunocompromised patients regarding SARS-CoV-2 there is limited evidence. The Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends completion of COVID-19 vaccination 2 weeks prior to starting immunotherapy but there are no recommendations with regards to critical care or burns patients. COVID-19 is a novel and potentially life threatening illness for which vaccines offer an important means to reduce morbidity and mortality in vulnerable patients We believe that patients with significant burn injury requiring hospital admission constitute a vulnerable group and should be vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 once they have recovered from the acute phase of burn injury. In our unit we use clinical status and C-reactive protein less than 40 to arbitrarily indicate a burn patient is out of acute immune response phase. We believe this is an important issue which requires consideration in the burn community.

Conflict of interest

None of the listed authors have any conflict of interest or financial disclosures.
  5 in total

1.  Early clinical pathologists: Edward Jenner (1749-1823)

Authors:  S Lakhani
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  The prevention and treatment of tetanus in the burn patient.

Authors:  R T Sherman
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  Interaction between the innate and adaptive immune systems is required to survive sepsis and control inflammation after injury.

Authors:  Odhran Shelley; Thomas Murphy; Hugh Paterson; John A Mannick; James A Lederer
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  The myth of the medical breakthrough: smallpox, vaccination, and Jenner reconsidered.

Authors:  C P Gross; K A Sepkowitz
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  1998 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  St Andrew's COVID-19 surgery safety (StACS) study: The Burns Centre experience.

Authors:  A C D Smith; B H Miranda; B Strong; R C I Jica; R Pinto-Lopes; W Khan; N A Martin; N El-Muttardi; D Barnes; O P Shelley
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 2.744

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  No Differences in Wound Healing and Scar Formation Were Observed in Patients With Different COVID-19 Vaccination Intervals.

Authors:  Chen Dong; Zhou Yu; Xin Quan; Siming Wei; Jiayang Wang; Xianjie Ma
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-06-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.