Literature DB >> 33947473

Mid-term results and survival rates following a single-design rotating hinge knee arthroplasty in non-tumor conditions in a Pakistani population.

Nouman Memon1, Faizan Iqbal2, Syed Shahid Noor1, Kazim Rahim Najjad1, Muhammad Farhan Sozera1, Arsalan Abro1, Noman Khan1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Information regarding the use of hinged implants in non-oncological conditions is limited in our region due to a lack of adequate data collection and follow-up. The purpose of this study is to evaluate mid-term results and risk factors affecting the survivorship of third-generation rotating hinge knee (RHK) patients in non-oncological conditions.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 41 single, third-generation, rotating hinge prostheses in three complex primary knee procedures and 38 revision knee surgeries in between 2007 to 2014. Implant survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors influencing implant survival were identified using the log-rank test. During the study period, clinical results along with complications were assessed. Clinical outcomes were assessed by using the Knee Society Score (KSS).
RESULTS: RHK arthroplasty was used in 41 patients. Out of 41 patients, a RHK was used in three patients with a complex primary deformed knee whereas in 38 patients, a RHK was used in revision arthroplasty surgery. The cumulative implant survival rate with re-revision due to any cause was found to be 87.8% (95% CI 69.2-90.1) at 5-7 years. Prosthetic joint infection, peri-prosthetic fracture and extensor mechanism complications were the commonest mode of failure. The P value was found to be significant when comparing KSS pre-operatively and post-operatively.
CONCLUSION: The cumulative implant survival rate was found to be 87.8%. Prosthetic joint infection was the commonest mode of failure in patients who underwent third-generation RHK surgery for variable indications. Being a patient with a high Charlson comorbidity index is the main risk factor associated with failure of the rotating hinge implant.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Instability; Prosthetic joint infection; Rotating hinge knee; Survival

Year:  2021        PMID: 33947473     DOI: 10.1186/s43019-021-00102-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res        ISSN: 2234-0726


  4 in total

1.  Causes and Clinical Outcomes of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dong-Hyun Lee; Seung-Hun Lee; Eun-Kyoo Song; Jong-Keun Seon; Hong-An Lim; Hong-Yeol Yang
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2017-06-01

2.  Posterior condylar offset is an independent predictor of functional outcome after revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  N D Clement; D J MacDonald; D F Hamilton; R Burnett
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 5.853

Review 3.  Management of metaphyseal bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Francesco Mancuso; Arianna Beltrame; Elia Colombo; Enrick Miani; Fabrizio Bassini
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2017-06-07

Review 4.  The role of rotating hinge implants in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Gilles Pasquier; Matthieu Ehlinger; Didier Mainard
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2019-06-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.