Elizabeth A Miller1, Brittanie Winfield1, Bonnie P Weber1, Cristian Flores-Figueroa2, Jeannette Munoz-Aguayo2, Jared Huisinga3, Timothy J Johnson4,5. 1. Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, USA. 2. University of Minnesota, Mid-Central Research and Outreach Center, Willmar, MN, USA. 3. Life Science Innovations, Willmar, MN, USA. 4. Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, USA. tjj@umn.edu. 5. University of Minnesota, Mid-Central Research and Outreach Center, Willmar, MN, USA. tjj@umn.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Microbiota development is a critical aspect of turkey poult maturation, and the succession of microbes in the turkey gut has been shown to correlate with poult performance. The purpose of this study was to determine the fate of the microbiota in turkey poults after movement of birds first raised in an isolated hatch brood system into a more traditional commercial brood facility with pre-existing birds. Turkey poults were first divided into groups raised in conventional brood pens from day-of-hatch and those raised in an experimental hatch brood system. After 11 days of growth, hatch brood birds were moved into pens within the conventional brood barn and monitored for an additional 18 days. Sampling of both hatch brood and conventional pen birds was performed at multiple timepoints throughout the study, and cecal content was used to analyze the bacterial microbiota using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. RESULTS: Alpha diversity tended to be higher in samples from conventional pen birds compared to those from hatch brood birds prior to the day 11 move, but the difference between systems was not observed post-move. Using beta diversity metrics, bacterial community succession appeared delayed in the hatch brood system birds pre-move, but post-move community composition quickly converged with that of the conventional pen birds. This was validated through assessment of significantly different genera between hatch brood system and conventional pen birds, where numbers of significantly different taxa quickly decreased following the move. Some key taxa previously associated with poult performance were delayed in their appearance and relative abundance in hatch brood birds. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this study demonstrates that the use of isolated hatch brood systems has an impact on the poult gut microbiota, but its impact is resolved quickly once the birds are introduced into a conventional brood environment. Therefore, the benefits of pathogen reduction with hatch brood systems may outweigh negative microbiota impacts due to isolation.
BACKGROUND: Microbiota development is a critical aspect of turkey poult maturation, and the succession of microbes in the turkey gut has been shown to correlate with poult performance. The purpose of this study was to determine the fate of the microbiota in turkey poults after movement of birds first raised in an isolated hatch brood system into a more traditional commercial brood facility with pre-existing birds. Turkey poults were first divided into groups raised in conventional brood pens from day-of-hatch and those raised in an experimental hatch brood system. After 11 days of growth, hatch brood birds were moved into pens within the conventional brood barn and monitored for an additional 18 days. Sampling of both hatch brood and conventional pen birds was performed at multiple timepoints throughout the study, and cecal content was used to analyze the bacterial microbiota using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. RESULTS: Alpha diversity tended to be higher in samples from conventional pen birds compared to those from hatch brood birds prior to the day 11 move, but the difference between systems was not observed post-move. Using beta diversity metrics, bacterial community succession appeared delayed in the hatch brood system birds pre-move, but post-move community composition quickly converged with that of the conventional pen birds. This was validated through assessment of significantly different genera between hatch brood system and conventional pen birds, where numbers of significantly different taxa quickly decreased following the move. Some key taxa previously associated with poult performance were delayed in their appearance and relative abundance in hatch brood birds. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this study demonstrates that the use of isolated hatch brood systems has an impact on the poult gut microbiota, but its impact is resolved quickly once the birds are introduced into a conventional brood environment. Therefore, the benefits of pathogen reduction with hatch brood systems may outweigh negative microbiota impacts due to isolation.
Authors: Daryl M Gohl; Pajau Vangay; John Garbe; Allison MacLean; Adam Hauge; Aaron Becker; Trevor J Gould; Jonathan B Clayton; Timothy J Johnson; Ryan Hunter; Dan Knights; Kenneth B Beckman Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2016-07-25 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Christiam Camacho; George Coulouris; Vahram Avagyan; Ning Ma; Jason Papadopoulos; Kevin Bealer; Thomas L Madden Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Date: 2009-12-15 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Benjamin J Callahan; Paul J McMurdie; Michael J Rosen; Andrew W Han; Amy Jo A Johnson; Susan P Holmes Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2016-05-23 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Toby J Wilkinson; A A Cowan; H E Vallin; L A Onime; Linda B Oyama; S J Cameron; Charlotte Gonot; J M Moorby; K Waddams; V J Theobald; D Leemans; S Bowra; C Nixey; Sharon A Huws Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2017-06-22 Impact factor: 5.640
Authors: Jessica L Danzeisen; Alamanda J Calvert; Sally L Noll; Brian McComb; Julie S Sherwood; Catherine M Logue; Timothy J Johnson Journal: PeerJ Date: 2013-12-23 Impact factor: 2.984