Nina Lapke1,2, Chien-Hung Chen1, Ting-Chang Chang3,4, Angel Chao3,4, Yen-Jung Lu5, Chyong-Huey Lai3,4, Kien Thiam Tan1, Hua-Chien Chen1, Hsiao-Yun Lu1, Shu-Jen Chen1. 1. ACT Genomics, Co. Ltd., 3F., No.345, Xinhu 2nd Rd., Neihu Dist, Taipei City, 114, Taiwan. 2. ACT Genomics, Co. Ltd., Units 803 - 807, 8F, Building 15W, No.15 Science Park West Avenue, Hong Kong Science Park, Pak Shek Kok. NT, Hong Kong, Hong Kong. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Linkou Medical Center, 5 Fushin St., Guishan District, Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan. 4. Gynecologic Cancer Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 5 Fushin St., Guishan District, Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan. 5. ACT Genomics, Co. Ltd., 3F., No.345, Xinhu 2nd Rd., Neihu Dist, Taipei City, 114, Taiwan. yjlu@actgenomics.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Genetic alterations for epithelial ovarian cancer are insufficiently characterized. Previous studies are limited regarding included histologies, gene numbers, copy number variant (CNV) detection, and interpretation of pathway alteration patterns of individual patients. METHODS: We sequenced 410 genes to analyze mutations and CNV of 82 ovarian carcinomas, including high-grade serous (n = 37), endometrioid (n = 22) and clear cell (n = 23) histologies. Eligibility for targeted therapy was determined for each patient by a pathway-based approach. The analysis covered DNA repair, receptor tyrosine kinase, PI3K/AKT/MTOR, RAS/MAPK, cell cycle, and hedgehog pathways, and included 14 drug targets. RESULTS: Postulated PARP, MTOR, and CDK4/6 inhibition sensitivity were most common. BRCA1/2 alterations, PTEN loss, and gain of PIK3CA and CCND1 were characteristic for high-grade serous carcinomas. Mutations of ARID1A, PIK3CA, and KRAS, and ERBB2 gain were enriched in the other histologies. PTEN mutations and high tumor mutational burden were characteristic for endometrioid carcinomas. Drug target downstream alterations impaired actionability in all histologies, and many alterations would not have been discovered by key gene mutational analysis. Individual patients often had more than one actionable drug target. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic alterations in ovarian carcinomas are complex and differ among histologies. Our results aid the personalization of therapy and biomarker analysis for clinical studies, and indicate a high potential for combinations of targeted therapies.
BACKGROUND: Genetic alterations for epithelial ovarian cancer are insufficiently characterized. Previous studies are limited regarding included histologies, gene numbers, copy number variant (CNV) detection, and interpretation of pathway alteration patterns of individual patients. METHODS: We sequenced 410 genes to analyze mutations and CNV of 82 ovarian carcinomas, including high-grade serous (n = 37), endometrioid (n = 22) and clear cell (n = 23) histologies. Eligibility for targeted therapy was determined for each patient by a pathway-based approach. The analysis covered DNA repair, receptor tyrosine kinase, PI3K/AKT/MTOR, RAS/MAPK, cell cycle, and hedgehog pathways, and included 14 drug targets. RESULTS: Postulated PARP, MTOR, and CDK4/6 inhibition sensitivity were most common. BRCA1/2 alterations, PTEN loss, and gain of PIK3CA and CCND1 were characteristic for high-grade serous carcinomas. Mutations of ARID1A, PIK3CA, and KRAS, and ERBB2 gain were enriched in the other histologies. PTEN mutations and high tumor mutational burden were characteristic for endometrioid carcinomas. Drug target downstream alterations impaired actionability in all histologies, and many alterations would not have been discovered by key gene mutational analysis. Individual patients often had more than one actionable drug target. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic alterations in ovarian carcinomas are complex and differ among histologies. Our results aid the personalization of therapy and biomarker analysis for clinical studies, and indicate a high potential for combinations of targeted therapies.
Authors: A Spreafico; A M Oza; B A Clarke; H J Mackay; P Shaw; M Butler; N C Dhani; S Lheureux; M K Wilson; S Welch; T Zhang; C Yu; T Stockley; L L Siu; S Kamel-Reid; P L Bedard Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Siqing Fu; Bryan T Hennessy; Chaan S Ng; Zhenlin Ju; Kevin R Coombes; Judith K Wolf; Anil K Sood; Charles F Levenback; Robert L Coleman; John J Kavanagh; David M Gershenson; Maurie Markman; Kristine Dice; Adrienne Howard; Jane Li; Yang Li; Katherine Stemke-Hale; Mary Dyer; Edward Atkinson; Ed Jackson; Vikas Kundra; Razelle Kurzrock; Robert C Bast; Gordon B Mills Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2012-04-06 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Philippe L Bedard; Josep Tabernero; Filip Janku; Zev A Wainberg; Luis Paz-Ares; Johan Vansteenkiste; Eric Van Cutsem; José Pérez-García; Anastasios Stathis; Carolyn D Britten; Ngocdiep Le; Kirsten Carter; David Demanse; Denes Csonka; Malte Peters; Angela Zubel; Heidi Nauwelaerts; Cristiana Sessa Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-12-10 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: T Sugiyama; T Kamura; J Kigawa; N Terakawa; Y Kikuchi; T Kita; M Suzuki; I Sato; K Taguchi Journal: Cancer Date: 2000-06-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Stanley B Kaye; Louis Fehrenbacher; Robert Holloway; Amnon Amit; Beth Karlan; Brian Slomovitz; Paul Sabbatini; Ling Fu; Robert L Yauch; Ilsung Chang; Josina C Reddy Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-10-02 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Melissa K McConechy; Jiarui Ding; Janine Senz; Winnie Yang; Nataliya Melnyk; Alicia A Tone; Leah M Prentice; Kimberly C Wiegand; Jessica N McAlpine; Sohrab P Shah; Cheng-Han Lee; Paul J Goodfellow; C Blake Gilks; David G Huntsman Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2013-06-14 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Maria Schwaederle; Melissa Zhao; J Jack Lee; Vladimir Lazar; Brian Leyland-Jones; Richard L Schilsky; John Mendelsohn; Razelle Kurzrock Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2016-11-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Jason K Sicklick; Shumei Kato; Ryosuke Okamura; Maria Schwaederle; Michael E Hahn; Casey B Williams; Pradip De; Amy Krie; David E Piccioni; Vincent A Miller; Jeffrey S Ross; Adam Benson; Jennifer Webster; Philip J Stephens; J Jack Lee; Paul T Fanta; Scott M Lippman; Brian Leyland-Jones; Razelle Kurzrock Journal: Nat Med Date: 2019-04-22 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Michael L Friedlander; Kenneth Russell; Sherri Millis; Zoran Gatalica; Ryan Bender; Andreas Voss Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: Amira Salah El-Din Youssef; Mohamed A Abdel-Fattah; Mai M Lotfy; Auhood Nassar; Mohamed Abouelhoda; Ahmed O Touny; Zeinab K Hassan; Mohammed Mohey Eldin; Abeer A Bahnassy; Hussein Khaled; Abdel Rahman N Zekri Journal: Curr Issues Mol Biol Date: 2022-03-18 Impact factor: 2.976
Authors: Yan Du; Yilin Lin; Bo Wang; Yang Li; Duo Xu; Lin Gan; Xiaoyu Xiong; Sen Hou; Shuang Chen; Zhanlong Shen; Yingjiang Ye Journal: Front Genet Date: 2022-09-13 Impact factor: 4.772