Pål V Johnsen1,2, Signe Riemer-Sørensen3, Andrew Thomas DeWan4,5, Megan E Cahill4, Mette Langaas6. 1. SINTEF DIGITAL, Forskningsveien 1, 0373, Oslo, Norway. pal.johnsen@sintef.no. 2. Department of Mathematical Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, A. Getz vei 1, 7491, Trondheim, Norway. pal.johnsen@sintef.no. 3. SINTEF DIGITAL, Forskningsveien 1, 0373, Oslo, Norway. 4. Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology and Center for Perinatal, Pediatric and Environmental Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, 1 Church Street, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA. 5. Gemini Center for Sepsis Research, Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Prinsesse Kristinas gate 3, 7030, Trondheim, Norway. 6. Department of Mathematical Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, A. Getz vei 1, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The identification of gene-gene and gene-environment interactions in genome-wide association studies is challenging due to the unknown nature of the interactions and the overwhelmingly large number of possible combinations. Parametric regression models are suitable to look for prespecified interactions. Nonparametric models such as tree ensemble models, with the ability to detect any unspecified interaction, have previously been difficult to interpret. However, with the development of methods for model explainability, it is now possible to interpret tree ensemble models efficiently and with a strong theoretical basis. RESULTS: We propose a tree ensemble- and SHAP-based method for identifying as well as interpreting potential gene-gene and gene-environment interactions on large-scale biobank data. A set of independent cross-validation runs are used to implicitly investigate the whole genome. We apply and evaluate the method using data from the UK Biobank with obesity as the phenotype. The results are in line with previous research on obesity as we identify top SNPs previously associated with obesity. We further demonstrate how to interpret and visualize interaction candidates. CONCLUSIONS: The new method identifies interaction candidates otherwise not detected with parametric regression models. However, further research is needed to evaluate the uncertainties of these candidates. The method can be applied to large-scale biobanks with high-dimensional data.
BACKGROUND: The identification of gene-gene and gene-environment interactions in genome-wide association studies is challenging due to the unknown nature of the interactions and the overwhelmingly large number of possible combinations. Parametric regression models are suitable to look for prespecified interactions. Nonparametric models such as tree ensemble models, with the ability to detect any unspecified interaction, have previously been difficult to interpret. However, with the development of methods for model explainability, it is now possible to interpret tree ensemble models efficiently and with a strong theoretical basis. RESULTS: We propose a tree ensemble- and SHAP-based method for identifying as well as interpreting potential gene-gene and gene-environment interactions on large-scale biobank data. A set of independent cross-validation runs are used to implicitly investigate the whole genome. We apply and evaluate the method using data from the UK Biobank with obesity as the phenotype. The results are in line with previous research on obesity as we identify top SNPs previously associated with obesity. We further demonstrate how to interpret and visualize interaction candidates. CONCLUSIONS: The new method identifies interaction candidates otherwise not detected with parametric regression models. However, further research is needed to evaluate the uncertainties of these candidates. The method can be applied to large-scale biobanks with high-dimensional data.
Entities:
Keywords:
GWAS; Gene–gene and gene–environment interactions; Model explainability; SHAP; Tree ensemble models; XGBoost
Authors: Xiang Wan; Can Yang; Qiang Yang; Hong Xue; Xiaodan Fan; Nelson L S Tang; Weichuan Yu Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2010-09-10 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Scott M Lundberg; Gabriel Erion; Hugh Chen; Alex DeGrave; Jordan M Prutkin; Bala Nair; Ronit Katz; Jonathan Himmelfarb; Nisha Bansal; Su-In Lee Journal: Nat Mach Intell Date: 2020-01-17
Authors: Po-Ru Loh; George Tucker; Brendan K Bulik-Sullivan; Bjarni J Vilhjálmsson; Hilary K Finucane; Rany M Salem; Daniel I Chasman; Paul M Ridker; Benjamin M Neale; Bonnie Berger; Nick Patterson; Alkes L Price Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2015-02-02 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Hugo Saner; Tobias Nef; Narayan Schütz; Samuel E J Knobel; Angela Botros; Michael Single; Bruno Pais; Valérie Santschi; Daniel Gatica-Perez; Philipp Buluschek; Prabitha Urwyler; Stephan M Gerber; René M Müri; Urs P Mosimann Journal: NPJ Digit Med Date: 2022-08-16