Literature DB >> 33947025

Right Ventricular Volume and Function Assessment in Congenital Heart Disease Using CMR Compressed-Sensing Real-Time Cine Imaging.

Benjamin Longère1, Julien Pagniez2, Augustin Coisne1, Hedi Farah2, Michaela Schmidt3, Christoph Forman3, Valentina Silvestri2, Arianna Simeone2, Christos V Gkizas2, Justin Hennicaux2, Emma Cheasty4, Solenn Toupin5, David Montaigne1, François Pontana1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability of compressed-sensing (CS) real-time single-breath-hold cine imaging for quantification of right ventricular (RV) function and volumes in congenital heart disease (CHD) patients in comparison with the standard multi-breath-hold technique.
METHODS: Sixty-one consecutive CHD patients (mean age = 22.2 ± 9.0 (SD) years) were prospectively evaluated during either the initial work-up or after repair. For each patient, two series of cine images were acquired: first, the reference segmented multi-breath-hold steady-state free-precession sequence (SSFPref), including a short-axis stack, one four-chamber slice, and one long-axis slice; then, an additional real-time compressed-sensing single-breath-hold sequence (CSrt) providing the same slices. Two radiologists independently assessed the image quality and RV volumes for both techniques, which were compared using the Wilcoxon test and paired Student's t test, Bland-Altman, and linear regression analyses. The visualization of wall-motion disorders and tricuspid-regurgitation-related signal voids were also analyzed.
RESULTS: The mean acquisition time for CSrt was 22.4 ± 6.2 (SD) s (95% CI: 20.8-23.9 s) versus 442.2 ± 89.9 (SD) s (95% CI: 419.2-465.2 s) for SSFPref (p < 0.001). The image quality of CSrt was diagnostic in all examinations and was mostly rated as good (n = 49/61; 80.3%). There was a high correlation between SSFPref and CSrt images regarding RV ejection fraction (49.8 ± 7.8 (SD)% (95% CI: 47.8-51.8%) versus 48.7 ± 8.6 (SD)% (95% CI: 46.5-50.9%), respectively; r = 0.94) and RV end-diastolic volume (192.9 ± 60.1 (SD) mL (95% CI: 177.5-208.3 mL) versus 194.9 ± 62.1 (SD) mL (95% CI: 179.0-210.8 mL), respectively; r = 0.98). In CSrt images, tricuspid-regurgitation and wall-motion disorder visualization was good (area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.87) and excellent (AUC = 1), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Compressed-sensing real-time cine imaging enables, in one breath hold, an accurate assessment of RV function and volumes in CHD patients in comparison with standard SSFPref, allowing a substantial improvement in time efficiency.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CMR; GUCH; cardiac; compressed sensing; congenital heart disease; heart; magnetic resonance; real-time imaging

Year:  2021        PMID: 33947025     DOI: 10.3390/jcm10091930

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Med        ISSN: 2077-0383            Impact factor:   4.241


  33 in total

1.  Steady-state free precession magnetic resonance imaging of the heart: comparison with segmented k-space gradient-echo imaging.

Authors:  S Plein; T N Bloomer; J P Ridgway; T R Jones; G J Bainbridge; M U Sivananthan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Review of the role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in congenital heart disease, with a focus on right ventricle assessment.

Authors:  Beatrice Bonello; Philip J Kilner
Journal:  Arch Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 2.340

3.  Real-time SPARSE-SENSE cardiac cine MR imaging: optimization of image reconstruction and sequence validation.

Authors:  Juliane Goebel; Felix Nensa; Bettina Bomas; Haemi P Schemuth; Stefan Maderwald; Marcel Gratz; Harald H Quick; Thomas Schlosser; Kai Nassenstein
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Highly accelerated cardiac MRI using iterative SENSE reconstruction: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  Bradley D Allen; Maria Carr; Marcos P F Botelho; Amir Ali Rahsepar; Michael Markl; Michael O Zenge; Michaela Schmidt; Mariappan S Nadar; Bruce Spottiswoode; Jeremy D Collins; James C Carr
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of adult congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Helmut Baumgartner; Julie De Backer; Sonya V Babu-Narayan; Werner Budts; Massimo Chessa; Gerhard-Paul Diller; Bernard Lung; Jolanda Kluin; Irene M Lang; Folkert Meijboom; Philip Moons; Barbara J M Mulder; Erwin Oechslin; Jolien W Roos-Hesselink; Markus Schwerzmann; Lars Sondergaard; Katja Zeppenfeld
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Changing mortality in congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Paul Khairy; Raluca Ionescu-Ittu; Andrew S Mackie; Michal Abrahamowicz; Louise Pilote; Ariane J Marelli
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Interstudy variability in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging measurements of ventricular volume, mass, and ejection fraction in repaired tetralogy of Fallot: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Shannon E Blalock; Puja Banka; Tal Geva; Andrew J Powell; Jing Zhou; Ashwin Prakash
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Compressed sensing real-time cine imaging for assessment of ventricular function, volumes and mass in clinical practice.

Authors:  Mathilde Vermersch; Benjamin Longère; Augustin Coisne; Michaela Schmidt; Christoph Forman; Aurélien Monnet; Julien Pagniez; Valentina Silvestri; Arianna Simeone; Emma Cheasty; David Montaigne; François Pontana
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Real-time assessment of right and left ventricular volumes and function in children using high spatiotemporal resolution spiral bSSFP with compressed sensing.

Authors:  Jennifer A Steeden; Grzegorz T Kowalik; Oliver Tann; Marina Hughes; Kristian H Mortensen; Vivek Muthurangu
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 10.  SCMR Position Paper (2020) on clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Tim Leiner; Jan Bogaert; Matthias G Friedrich; Raad Mohiaddin; Vivek Muthurangu; Saul Myerson; Andrew J Powell; Subha V Raman; Dudley J Pennell
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.