| Literature DB >> 33946787 |
Dianxi Zhang1, Asif Mahmood2, Antonio Ariza-Montes3, Alejandro Vega-Muñoz4, Naveed Ahmad5, Heesup Han6, Muhammad Safdar Sial7.
Abstract
Previous studies have largely explored corporate social responsibility (CSR) for organization-centric outcomes to achieve organizational performance, organizational commitment, or organizational citizenship behavior. However, the importance of CSR to achieve customer-centric outcomes is underexplored to date. Contemporary researchers have recently turned their attention toward CSR from the viewpoint of customer-centric outcomes. Therefore, the present study attempts to test the influence of CSR communication on social media and customer loyalty in the banking sector of a developing economy in times of crisis. This study also investigates the mediating effect of electronic word of mouth (E-WOM) with this relationship. The data of the present study were collected from different banking customers using a self-administered questionnaire. The empirical findings of this study validated that the CSR communication of a bank on social media increases customer loyalty, and E-WOM partially mediates this relationship. This study will be helpful for the banking sector to understand the importance of CSR communication to increase customer loyalty, which is very important for every bank in times of crisis.Entities:
Keywords: E-word of mouth; banking customers; corporate social responsibility; customer loyalty; positive customer emotions; social media; times of crisis
Year: 2021 PMID: 33946787 PMCID: PMC8124371 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18094739
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Proposed research model where corporate social responsibility through social media (S–CSR) = the independent variable, customer loyalty = the dependent variable, electronic word of mouth (E-WOM) = the mediating variable, C′ = indirect direct effect of X on Y with the effect of the mediator, and C = direct effect of X on Y without a mediator. a= direct path from S-CSR to E-WOM and b = direct path from E-WOM to customer loyalty.
Demographic information of the sample.
| Demographic | Frequency | % |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Male | 288 | 66.8 |
| Female | 143 | 33.2 |
|
| ||
| 20–25 | 73 | 16.9 |
| 26–30 | 153 | 35.5 |
| 31–40 | 138 | 32.1 |
| Above 40 | 67 | 15.5 |
|
| ||
| Intermediate | 77 | 17.9 |
| Graduate | 112 | 26.0 |
| Master | 183 | 42.4 |
| Higher | 59 | 13.7 |
|
|
|
|
Factor loading, convergent validity, and reliability results.
| Variable | Statement | Loading | AVE | CR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S–CSR | I consider this bank a socially responsible bank. | 0.71 | ||
| This bank is more beneficial to society’s welfare than other banks. | 0.74 | |||
| This bank contributes something to society. | 0.79 | |||
| I share this bank’s (CSR) posts on my own Facebook (or other social media) page. | 0.83 | |||
| I engage in conversations (CSR) on the Facebook (or other social media) page of this bank. | 0.82 | 0.61 | 0.88 | |
| E-WOM | I am likely to spread positive word of mouth about this bank (on social media). | 0.70 | ||
| I would recommend this bank’s products/services to my friends (on social media). | 0.77 | |||
| If my friends were looking to purchase banking services, I would tell them to try this bank (on social media). | 0.72 | 0.53 | 0.77 | |
| Loyalty | I consider this bank my first choice when I purchase the services they supply. | 0.73 | ||
| I am willing to maintain my relationship with this bank | 0.72 | |||
| I am loyal to this bank. | 0.84 | 0.59 | 0.81 |
Notes: Loadings = factor loadings, CR = composite reliability, AVE = average-variance-extracted, S–CSR = corporate social responsibility through social medial, E-WOM = electronic word of mouth.
Correlations and discriminant validity.
| Variable | Mean | SD | S–CSR | E-WOM | Loyalty | Skewness | Kurtosis | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 3.88 | 0.58 |
| 0.27 ** | 0.24 ** | −0.56 | 0.47 | |
|
| 4.10 | 0.61 |
| 0.31 ** | −0.63 | 0.51 | ||
|
| 4.28 | 0.55 |
| −0.68 | 0.44 | |||
| ( | ||||||||
Notes: Bold diagonal = square root of average variance extracted (AVE), ** = values are significant.
Results of the hypotheses testing.
| Path | Beta Value | S.E | LLCI | ULCI | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Results of Hypothesis 1 and 2 | |||||
| S–CSR → Loyalty | 0.225 ** | 0.0442 | 0.293 | 0.537 | supported |
| S–CSR → E-WOM | 0.257 ** | 0.0371 | 0.310 | 0.583 | supported |
| ( | |||||
|
| |||||
| S–CSR → E-WOM → Loyalty | 0.173 ** | 0.021 | 0.044 | 0.063 | supported |
| ( | |||||
S–CSR, CSR on social media; E-WOM, electronic word of mouth; S.E = standard error, LLCI = lower limit confidence interval, ULCI = upper limit confidence interval, and *** and ** = significant values.