| Literature DB >> 33946658 |
Jayasree Nair1, Lauren Davidson1,2, Sylvia Gugino1, Carmon Koenigsknecht1, Justin Helman1, Lori Nielsen1, Deepika Sankaran3, Vikash Agrawal1,4, Praveen Chandrasekharan1, Munmun Rawat1, Sara K Berkelhamer1,5, Satyan Lakshminrusimha3.
Abstract
The optimal timing of cord clamping in asphyxia is not known. Our aims were to determine the effect of ventilation (sustained inflation-SI vs. positive pressure ventilation-V) with early (ECC) or delayed cord clamping (DCC) in asphyxiated near-term lambs. We hypothesized that SI with DCC improves gas exchange and hemodynamics in near-term lambs with asphyxial bradycardia. A total of 28 lambs were asphyxiated to a mean blood pressure of 22 mmHg. Lambs were randomized based on the timing of cord clamping (ECC-immediate, DCC-60 s) and mode of initial ventilation into five groups: ECC + V, ECC + SI, DCC, DCC + V and DCC + SI. The magnitude of placental transfusion was assessed using biotinylated RBC. Though an asphyxial bradycardia model, 2-3 lambs in each group were arrested. There was no difference in primary outcomes, the time to reach baseline carotid blood flow (CBF), HR ≥ 100 bpm or MBP ≥ 40 mmHg. SI reduced pulmonary (PBF) and umbilical venous (UV) blood flow without affecting CBF or umbilical arterial blood flow. A significant reduction in PBF with SI persisted for a few minutes after birth. In our model of perinatal asphyxia, an initial SI breath increased airway pressure, and reduced PBF and UV return with an intact cord. Further clinical studies evaluating the timing of cord clamping and ventilation strategy in asphyxiated infants are warranted.Entities:
Keywords: delayed cord clamping; perinatal asphyxia; placental transfusion; pulmonary blood flow; sustained inflation
Year: 2021 PMID: 33946658 PMCID: PMC8145980 DOI: 10.3390/children8050353
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Children (Basel) ISSN: 2227-9067
Figure 1Study groups based on the timing of cord clamping and type of ventilation. DCC: Delayed cord clamping, ECC: Early cord clamping, SI: Sustained inflation, PPV: Positive pressure ventilation.
Baseline Characteristics.
| ECC + V ( | ECC + SI ( | DCC | DCC + V ( | DCC + SI ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight (kg) | 4.1 ± 0.8 | 4.3 ± 1 | 3.7 ± 0.8 | 3.6 ± 0.4 | 3.7 ± 0.4 |
| Male | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| Multiple gestation | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| Incidence of arrest (epinephrine doses) | 2 (1) | 3 (2) | 2 (2) | 2 (2) | 3 (1) |
| Baseline hemodynamics | |||||
| Left carotid blood flow (mL/kg/min) | 28 ± 14 | 33 ± 10 | 24 ± 11 | 26 ± 11 | 33 ± 9 |
| Mean systemic blood pressure (mmHg) | 49 | 45 | 43 | 41 | 49 |
| Mean umbilical venous blood flow (mL/kg/min) | 29.8 ± 20 | 28.4 ± 17 | 34.2 ± 14.3 | 34.7 ± 11.1 | 49.2 ± 12.7 |
| Mean umbilical arterial blood flow (mL/kg/min) | 34.3 ± 29.6 | 22 ± 9 | 32.6 ± 9.8 | 31.4 ± 11.4 | 40.1 ± 18.5 |
| Asphyxia blood gas | |||||
| pH | 6.86 ± 0.1 | 6.88 ± 0.1 | 6.89 ± 0.0 | 6.88 ± 0.1 | 6.88 ± 0.1 |
| pCO2 (mm Hg) | 111 ± 19 | 121 ± 11 | 123 ± 4 | 112 ± 34 | 119 ± 25 |
| Lactate (mmol/L) | 8.5 ± 2.5 | 9.0 ± 2.2 | 8.9 ± 2.3 | 9.8 ± 2.1 | 12.4 ± 2 |
Primary outcomes and hemodynamic parameters during the intervention period.
| ECC + V ( | ECC + SI ( | DCC | DCC + V ( | DCC + SI ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
|
| 115 ± 124 | 190 ± 83 | 295 ± 180 | 246 ± 246 | 207 ± 119 |
|
| 149 ± 101 | 151 ± 116 | 247 ± 161 | 243 ± 212 | 173 ± 126 |
|
| 204 ± 189 | 217 ± 78 | 355 ± 181 | 281 ± 224 | 192 ± 107 |
|
| |||||
|
| 19.5 ± 5 | 37.7 ± 3 | n/a | 21.8 ± 6 | 34.6 ± 3 ** |
|
| 12.1 ± 11.6 | 8.1 ± 10.8 | 4.9 ± 3.7 | 4.9 ± 2.7 | 6.7 ± 8.2 |
|
| 2.1 ± 4.1 | 5.0 ± 6.7 | 3.6 ± 4.4 | 6.6 ± 6.4 | 1.3 ± 3.1 * |
|
| n/a | n/a | 4.5 ± 3.4 | 2.9 ± 2.2 | 1.6 ± 3.6 * |
|
| n/a | n/a | 3.1 ± 2.5 | 0.7 ± 1.6 | 1.3 ± 3.4 |
|
| 25 ± 13 | 21 ± 4 | 25 ± 6 | 21 ± 7 | 20 ± 9 |
Values are presented as mean ± SD; * p < 0.05 by Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance between DCC groups; ** p < 0.005 by Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance between groups.
Figure 2Post resuscitation hemodynamics in the first 10 min after birth in the five study groups: (a) carotid blood flow, (b) pulmonary blood flow, (c) mean blood pressure and (d) systolic blood pressure in all five study groups, with dashed lines reflecting the SI groups. Data are represented as mean ± SD. Black circle: ECC + V (n = 5), pink square dashed: ECC + SI (n = 6), green triangle: DCC (n = 5), purple triangle: DCC + V (n = 5), purple diamond dashed: DCC + SI (n = 7).
Gas exchange parameters.
| ECC + V ( | ECC + SI | DCC ( | DCC + V ( | DCC + SI ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blood gas parameters at 2 min | |||||
| pH | 6.9 ± 0.1 | 6.9 ± 0.1 | 6.9 ± 0.1 | 7.0 ± 0.2 | 6.9 ± 0.1 |
| pCO2 (mmHg) | 107 ± 16 | 110 ± 14 | 130 ± 24 | 87 ± 24 | 92 ± 26 |
| pO2 (mmHg) | 29 ± 24 | 27 ± 6 | 22 ± 14 | 29 ± 11 | 20 ± 8 |
| FiO2 | 0.5 ± 0.4 | 0.8 ± 0.3 | 0.5 ± 0.3 | 0.5 ± 0.4 | 0.8 ± 0.4 |
| P/F ratio | 106 ± 133 | 41 ± 24 | 51 ± 38 | 79 ± 65 | 39 ± 38 |
| Lactate (mmol/L) | 8.3 ± 1.8 | 8.7 ± 1.5 | 10.2 ± 2.4 | 8.9 ± 1.5 | 11.7 ± 2.5 |
| Blood gas parameters at 5 min | |||||
| pH | 6.9 ± 0.2 | 6.9 ± 0.1 | 6.9 ± 0.1 | 6.9 ± 0.2 | 7 ± 0.2 |
| pCO2 (mmHg) | 102 ± 27 | 95 ± 11 | 99 ± 39 | 90 ± 42 | 66 ± 36 |
| pO2 (mmHg) | 61 ± 51 | 85 ± 50 | 37 ± 31 | 46 ± 30 | 45 ± 17 |
| FiO2 | 0.6 ± 0.4 | 0.7 ± 0.3 | 0.6 ± 0.3 | 0.4 ± 0.2 | 0.5 ± 0.4 |
| P/F ratio | 126 ± 132 | 138 ± 60 | 93 ± 106 | 149 ± 110 | 127 ± 113 |
| Lactate (mmol/L) | 8.9 ± 2.3 | 8.8 ± 1.9 | 9.4 ± 3.4 | 9.8 ± 3.8 | 11.2 ± 3 |
| Blood gas parameters at 10 min | |||||
| pH | 7.0 ± 0.2 | 6.9 ± 0.1 | 6.9 ± 0.1 | 6.9 ± 0.2 | 7.0 ± 0.1 |
| pCO2 (mmHg) | 81 ± 15 | 82 ± 27 | 83 ± 39 | 73 ± 34 | 44 ± 15 * |
| pO2 (mmHg) | 82 ± 36 | 106 ± 68 | 52 ± 30 | 76 ± 49 | 134 ± 80 |
| FiO2 | 0.5 ± 0.3 | 0.5 ± 0.3 | 0.8 ± 0.4 | 0.7 ± 0.4 | 0.3 ± 0.1 |
| P/F ratio | 180 ± 72 | 227 ± 165 | 98 ± 83 | 165 ± 156 | 400 ± 151 *# |
| Lactate (mmol/L) | 8.5 ± 2.6 | 8 ± 2.1 | 10 ± 3.7 | 9.1 ± 2.5 | 11.8 ± 3.3 |
* p < 0.05 by Kruskal–Wallis test of variance in all groups; # p < 0.02 Kruskal–Wallis test of variance in DCC groups.
Measurement of blood volume and placental transfusion.
|
|
|
|
| Fetoplacental blood volume (mL/kg) | 82 ± 20 | 76 ± 18 |
| Newborn blood volume (mL/kg) | 61 ± 14 | 60 ± 17 |
| Residual placental blood volume (mL/kg) | 21 ± 15 | 16 ± 13 |
| Fraction of fetoplacental volume in newborn | 0.76 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.2 |
|
|
|
|
| Fetoplacental blood volume (mL/kg) | 92 ± 18 | 74 ± 19 |
| Newborn blood volume (mL/kg) | 58 ± 13 | 58 ± 12 |
| Residual placental blood volume (mL/kg) | 35 ± 8 | 16 ± 14 * |
| Fraction of fetoplacental volume in newborn | 0.65 ± 0.1 | 0.84 ± 0.2 * |
Values are presented as mean ± SD * p < 0.05 by Mann–Whitney U test vs. ECC.
Figure 3Post resuscitation hemodynamics in the first 10 min after birth in ventilation groups—effect of sustained inflation (gray squares, N = 13) is compared to positive pressure ventilation (Black circles, N = 10): (a) carotid blood (CBF), (b) pulmonary blood flow (PBF), (c) mean blood pressure (MBP) and (d) systolic blood pressure (SBP). Data are represented as mean ± SD. * p < 0.01 by repeated measures ANOVA.
Figure 4Post resuscitation hemodynamics in the first 10 min after birth based on the timing of cord clamping: (a) carotid blood flow, (b) pulmonary blood, (c) mean blood pressure and (d) systolic blood pressure. Data are represented as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05 repeated measures ANOVA. Black circles: ECC. Grey squares: DCC.
Figure 5Summary: effects of (A) ECC + V—current practice, (B) DCC + V and (C) DCC + SI in our model of ovine asphyxia induced by cord occlusion.