| Literature DB >> 33946573 |
Jan Oszmiański1, Sabina Lachowicz2, Paulina Nowicka1, Paweł Rubiński3, Tomasz Cebulak4.
Abstract
The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of Jerusalem artichoke processing methods and drying methods (freeze drying, sublimation drying, vacuum drying) on the basic physicochemical parameters, profiles and contents of sugars and polyphenolic compounds, and health-promoting properties (antioxidant activity, inhibition of the activities of α-amylase, α-glucosidase, and pancreatic lipase) of the produced purée. A total of 25 polyphenolic compounds belonging to hydroxycinnamic phenolic acids (LC-PDA-MS-QTof) were detected in Jerusalem artichoke purée. Their average content in the raw material was at 820 mg/100 g dm (UPLC-PDA-FL) and was 2.7 times higher than in the cooked material. The chemical composition and the health-promoting value of the purées were affected by the drying method, with the most beneficial values of the evaluated parameters obtained upon freeze drying. Vacuum drying could offer an alternative to freeze drying, as both methods ensured relatively comparable values of the assessed parameters.Entities:
Keywords: Helianthus tuberosus; drying; functional food; innovative food; natural food; pro-healthy properties
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33946573 PMCID: PMC8125012 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26092644
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
The results of analyzes of purées and dried JA.
| Type of Analysis | FDC | FDR | SDC | SDR | VDC | VDR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry matter (g/100 g) | 98.88 ± 0.20 aa | 98.88 ± 0.20 a | 97.14 ± 0.19 b | 92.66 ± 0.19 e | 95.90 ± 0.19 c | 95.60 ± 0.19 d |
| Water activity (aw) | 0.01 ± 0.00 c | 0.02 ± 0.00 c | 0.15 ± 0.00 c | 0.36 ± 0.00 a | 0.19 ± 0.00 ab | 0.11 ± 0.00 c |
| Ash (g/100 g) | 4.28 ± 0.01 a | 4.18 ± 0.01 a | 4.10 ± 0.01 b | 3.74 ± 0.01 c | 3.88 ± 0.01 c | 4.16 ± 0.01 b |
| pH | 5.86 ± 0.01 ab | 5.83 ± 0.01 ab | 5.77 ± 0.01 ab | 5.68 ± 0.01 b | 5.80 ± 0.01 ab | 5.90 ± 0.01 a |
| Total acidity (g/100 g) | 1.08 ± 0.00 a | 1.09 ± 0.00 a | 1.07 ± 0.00 a | 1.06 ± 0.00 a | 1.09 ± 0.00 a | 1.04 ± 0.00 a |
| Pectins (g/100 g) | 3.10 ± 0.01 d | 4.33 ± 0.01 a | 1.44 ± 0.00 f | 2.46 ± 0.01 e | 3.60 ± 0.01 c | 4.09 ± 0.01 b |
| Inulin (g/100 g) | 40.08 ± 0.08 e | 43.32 ± 0.09 a | 43.06 ± 0.09 b | 41.22 ± 0.08 c | 40.94 ± 0.08 d | 38.94 ± 0.08 f |
| Fructose (g/100 g) | 0.10 ± 0.00 b | 0.14 ± 0.00 b | 0.12 ± 0.00 b | 0.40 ± 0.00 a | 0.09 ± 0.00 b | 0.40 ± 0.00 a |
| Sucrose (g/100 g) | 1.33 ± 0.00 d | 1.84 ± 0.00 b | 1.23 ± 0.00 d | 1.61 ± 0.00 c | 1.55 ± 0.00 c | 2.06 ± 0.00 a |
a Values are means ± standard deviation, n = 3. Mean values within a row with different letters as a, b, c, d, e, f are significantly different at p < 0.05. Abbreviations: FDC, freeze drying of cooked material; FDR, freeze drying of raw material; SDC, sublimation drying of cooked material; SDR, freeze drying of raw material; VDC, vacuum drying of cooked material; VDR, vacuum drying of raw material.
Analysis results of phenolic compounds (mg/100 g dm) in dry JA samples.
| Compounds | MS/MS | R.t. (min) | FDC | FDR | SDC | SDR | VDC | VDR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hydroxyferulic acid hexoside a | 371/353/209 | 3.01 | 2.07 ± 0.00 a e | 1.76 ± 0.00 b | 1.36 ± 0.01 c | 1.47 ± 0.01 c | 1.85 ± 0.00 b | 1.68 ± 0.01 b |
| Caffeoylquinic acid b (isomer of chlorogenic acid) | 353/191/179/135 | 3.31 | 33.25 ± 0.07 a | 20.90 ± 0.04 c | 20.46 ± 0.04 d | 1.85 ± 0.00 f | 28.39 ± 0.06 b | 16.27 ± 0.03 e |
| Hydroxyferulic acid hexoside(isommer) a | 371/353/209 | 3.50 | 2.75 ± 0.01 b | 2.28 ± 0.00 c | 2.31 ± 0.01 c | 5.69 ± 0.01 a | 2.74 ± 0.01 b | 5.61 ± 0.01 a |
| Hydroxyferulic acid hexoside(isommer) a | 371/353/209 | 3.66 | 0.40 ± 0.00 b | 0.40 ± 0.00 b | 0.27 ± 0.00 b | 0.87 ± 0.00 a | 0.35 ± 0.00 b | 0.84 ± 0.00 a |
| Caffeoylquinic acid-quinon sulfite b | 415/387/258//191/179/161 | 3.83 | nd | 87.36 ± 0.17 c | nd | 99.81 ± 0.20 a | nd | 98.14 ± 0.20 b |
| Caffeoylquinic acid b | 353/191/179/135 | 3.87 | 2.52 ± 0.01 f | 76.77 ± 0.15 c | 3.47 ± 0.01 d | 87.71 ± 0.18 a | 2.85 ± 0.01 e | 86.24 ± 0.17 b |
| caffeoyl-gucoside c | 341/179/135 | 4.25 | 7.71 ± 0.02 f | 8.63 ± 0.02 e | 10.98 ± 0.02 b | 10.19 ± 0.02 c | 8.87 ± 0.02 d | 11.37 ± 0.02 a |
| 3- | 353/191/135 | 4.36 | 83.20 ± 0.17 d | 150.46 ± 0.30 a | 51.46 ± 0.10 f | 111.94 ± 0.22 c | 72.38 ± 0.14 e | 119.73 ± 0.24 b |
| Caffeoylquinic acid b | 353/191/179/173/135 | 4.51 | 38.54 ± 0.08 a | 11.73 ± 0.02 f | 26.95 ± 0.05 c | 14.21 ± 0.03 d | 33.02 ± 0.07 b | 13.34 ± 0.03 e |
| Caffeoylquinic acid b | 353/191/179/173/135 | 4.79 | 14.19 ± 0.03 c | 6.19 ± 0.01 d | 14.26 ± 0.03 c | 20.25 ± 0.04 b | 14.31 ± 0.03 c | 37.94 ± 0.08 a |
| Caffeoylquinic acid b | 353/191/179/173/135 | 5.13 | 27.31 ± 0.05 e | 91.61 ± 0.18 a | 23.44 ± 0.05 f | 71.29 ± 0.14 c | 27.63 ± 0.06 d | 75.10 ± 0.15 b |
| Caffeoyl glucopyranose c | 341/179/135 | 5.33 | 4.42 ± 0.01 d | 8.88 ± 0.02 c | 3.02 ± 0.01 f | 12.74 ± 0.03 a | 3.50 ± 0.01 e | 10.47 ± 0.02 b |
| Dicaffeoylquinic acid b | 515/353/191/179/173/161 | 5.58 | 13.96 ± 0.03 b | 53.89 ± 0.11 a | 10.12 ± 0.02 e | 11.38 ± 0.02 d | 12.52 ± 0.03 c | 7.90 ± 0.02 f |
| Dicaffeoylquinic acids- quinon sulfite b | 577/415/387/258//191/179 | 5.75 | nd | 99.58 ± 0.20 a | nd | 77.63 ± 0.16 c | nd | 83.43 ± 0.17 b |
| Caffeoylquinic acid b | 353/191/179/173/161/135 | 6.14 | 9.36 ± 0.02 d | 17.15 ± 0.03 c | 4.86 ± 0.01 f | 21.25 ± 0.04 a | 7.33 ± 0.01 e | 17.84 ± 0.04 b |
| Caffeoylquinic acid-quinon sulfite b | 415/387/258//191/179/161 | 6.25 | nd | 12.89 ± 0.03 a | nd | 7.78 ± 0.02 b | Nd | 6.04 ± 0.01 c |
| Hydroxyferulic acid hexoside (isomer 3) a | 371/353/209 | 6.33 | 2.05 ± 0.01 d | 4.47 ± 0.01 b | 1.44 ± 0.01 f | 4.88 ± 0.01 a | 1.77 ± 0.01 e | 3.36 ± 0.01 c |
| Hydroxyferulic acid hexoside (isomer 3) a | 371/353/209 | 6.57 | 4.02 ± 0.01 b | 4.70 ± 0.01 a | 2.38 ± 0.01 e | 2.84 ± 0.01 d | 3.34 ± 0.01 c | 1.80 ± 0.01 f |
| Hydroxyferulic acid hexoside (isomer 3) a | 371/353/209 | 6.96 | 1.37 ± 0.00 d | 26.36 ± 0.05 a | 0.95 ± 0.00 e | 24.90 ± 0.05 b | 1.11 ± 0.00 e | 19.28 ± 0.04 c |
| Dicaffeoylquinic acids- quinon sulfite b | 577/415/387/258//191/179 | 7.04 | nd | 75.95 ± 0.15 a | nd | 71.74 ± 0.14 b | Nd | 55.55 ± 0.11 c |
| 3,4-Di- | 515/353/191 | 7.51 | 36.42 ± 0.07 a | 24.15 ± 0.05 c | 20.28 ± 0.04 d | 19.23 ± 0.04 e | 31.14 ± 0.06 b | 12.88 ± 0.03 f |
| 3,5-Di- | 515/353/191 | 7.77 | 34.89 ± 0.07 d | 118.37 ± 0.24 a | 17.69 ± 0.04 f | 68.39 ± 0.14 c | 28.66 ± 0.06 e | 77.14 ± 0.15 b |
| Hydroxyferulic acid hexoside (isomer 3) a | 371/353/209 | 7.94 | 1.38 ± 0.00 d | 2.64 ± 0.01 a | 0.77 ± 0.00 e | 1.75 ± 0.00 c | 0.90 ± 0.00 e | 1.97 ± 0.00 b |
| 1,5-Di- | 515/353/191 | 8.21 | 32.40 ± 0.06 a | 14.80 ± 0.03 d | 17.26 ± 0.03 c | 11.24 ± 0.02 e | 27.39 ± 0.05 b | 9.37 ± 0.02 g |
| Hydroxyferulic acid hexoside (isomer 3) a | 371/353/209 | 8.48 | 0.83 ± 0.00 d | 1.58 ± 0.01 a | 0.40 ± 0.00 f | 1.14 ± 0.00 b | 0.63 ± 0.00 e | 0.99 ± 0.00 bc |
| Sum of phenolic acids | 353.05 ± 19.87 d | 923.53 ± 43.70 a | 234.13 ± 12.35 f | 762.16 ± 35.70 b | 310.68 ± 17.23 e | 774.28 ± 36.67 c |
a The calibration curve of ferulic acid was used to quantify; b the calibration curve of 5-O-caffeoylquinic was used to quantify; c the calibration curve of caffeic acid was used to quantify; d the calibration curve of 3-O-caffeoylquinic acid was used to quantify; e values are means ± standard deviation, n = 3. Mean values within a row with different letters as a, b, c, d, e, f are significantly different at p < 0.05. Abbreviations: FDC, freeze drying of cooked material; FDR, freeze drying of raw material; SDC, sublimation drying of cooked material; SDR, freeze drying of raw material; VDC, vacuum drying of cooked material; VDR, vacuum drying of raw material; R.t., retention time; nd, not detected.
Color measurement results.
| Type of Sample | L * | a * | b * |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDR | 92.51 ± 0.19 a a | –1.22 ± 0.01 e | 12.11 ± 0.02 c |
| FDC | 90.22 ± 0.18 b | –1.45 ± 0.01 f | 10.88 ± 0.02 e |
| SDR | 88.32 ± 0.18 c | –0.40 ± 0.00 b | 14.10 ± 0.03 b |
| SDC | 85.76 ± 0.17 e | –0.94 ± 0.00 d | 11.67 ± 0.02 d |
| VDR | 84.63 ± 0.17 f | –0.79 ± 0.00 c | 14.05 ± 0.03 b |
| VDC | 86.99 ± 0.17 d | –0.26 ± 0.00 a | 14.59 ± 0.03 a |
a Values are means ± standard deviation, n = 3. Mean values within a row with different letters as a, b, c, d, e, f are significantly different at p < 0.05. Abbreviations: FDC, freeze drying of cooked material; FDR, freeze drying of raw material; SDC, sublimation drying of cooked material; SDR, freeze drying of raw material; VDC, vacuum drying of cooked material; VDR, vacuum drying of raw material.
The degree of metabolism and absorption of sugars derived from JA products.
| Type of Sample | α-Glucosidase | α-Amylase | Pancreatic Lipase | ABTS | FRAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IC50 (mL/mL) | IC50 (ug/mL) | IC50 (mL/mL) | (mmol TE/100 g dm) | (mmol TE/100 g dm) | |
| FDR | 166.70 ± 0.33 e a | 177.98 ± 0.36 c | 43.75 ± 0.09 c | 3.73 ± 0.01 d | 1.69 ± 0.01 e |
| FDC | 193.29 ± 0.39 f | 297.90 ± 0.60 f | 45.86 ± 0.09 e | 7.65 ± 0.02 a | 2.67 ± 0.01 a |
| SDR | 123.60 ± 0.25 b | 136.98 ± 0.27 b | 31.48 ± 0.06 a | 2.78 ± 0.01 f | 1.46 ± 0.00 f |
| SDC | 135.52 ± 0.27 c | 185.87 ± 0.37 d | 58.34 ± 0.12 f | 6.91 ± 0.01 c | 2.60 ± 0.01 b |
| VDR | 150.94 ± 0.30 d | 221.19 ± 0.44 e | 45.06 ± 0.09 d | 2.85 ± 0.01 e | 1.97 ± 0.01 d |
| VDC | 120.31 ± 0.24 a | 129.97 ± 0.26 a | 33.08 ± 0.07 b | 7.09 ± 0.01 b | 2.14 ± 0.01 c |
a Values are means ± standard deviation, n = 3. Mean values within a row with different letters as a, b, c, d, e, f, are significantly different at p < 0.05. Abbreviations: FDC, freeze drying of cooked material; FDR, freeze drying of raw material; SDC, sublimation drying of cooked material; SDR, freeze drying of raw material; VDC, vacuum drying of cooked material; VDR, vacuum drying of raw material.