Literature DB >> 33946354

Perceived Risk of Insect-Based Foods: An Assessment of the Entomophagy Attitude Questionnaire Predictive Validity.

Francesco La Barbera1, Mario Amato1, Roberto Fasanelli2, Fabio Verneau1.   

Abstract

Insects are a promising alternative protein source and their possible integration in the human diet has been extensively studied, also with reference to the degree of consumer acceptability and the main factors determining reluctance among Western consumers. Several studies have also proposed the use of protein meals derived from insects in animal feed as a possible way to promote the development of the insect chain. Consumer attitudes, perceived risks, and intention to eat insect-based foods have been extensively researched, yet the relationships between those factors are still unclear. On a sample of 202 Italian consumers, the present research used the Entomophagy Attitude Questionnaire (EAQ) to analyse the degree of acceptability of insects as food and meat obtained from animals raised on insect-based feeds with a specific focus on the role of attitudes and perceived risk. The research also evaluated the differences in acceptability between different types of animals fed with insects. The results show that the intention to engage in entomophagy is significantly correlated with all three of the EAQ's subscales, as well as with perceived risk. However, the effect of perceived risk does not significantly improve the predictive validity of EAQ with respect to the intention to eat insect-based food. The results also show that the degree of acceptability for different insect meal-reared animals changes among consumers: beef and pork are characterized by a lower degree of acceptability, while poultry and fish are more accepted by consumers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EAQ; direct entomophagy; feed; incremental validity; indirect entomophagy

Year:  2021        PMID: 33946354     DOI: 10.3390/insects12050403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Insects        ISSN: 2075-4450            Impact factor:   2.769


  12 in total

1.  A Monte Carlo evaluation of tests for comparing dependent correlations.

Authors:  James B Hittner; Kim May; N Clayton Silver
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  2003-04

2.  Can we cut out the meat of the dish? Constructing consumer-oriented pathways towards meat substitution.

Authors:  Hanna Schösler; Joop de Boer; Jan J Boersema
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 3.  A systematic review on consumer acceptance of alternative proteins: Pulses, algae, insects, plant-based meat alternatives, and cultured meat.

Authors:  M C Onwezen; E P Bouwman; M J Reinders; H Dagevos
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 3.868

4.  Understanding the factors influencing consumer willingness to accept the use of insects to feed poultry, cattle, pigs and fish in Brazil.

Authors:  Carla Heloisa de Faria Domingues; João Augusto Rossi Borges; Clandio Favarini Ruviaro; Diego Gomes Freire Guidolin; Juliana Rosa Mauad Carrijo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Safety of dried yellow mealworm (Tenebrio molitor larva) as a novel food pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283.

Authors:  Dominique Turck; Jacqueline Castenmiller; Stefaan De Henauw; Karen Ildico Hirsch-Ernst; John Kearney; Alexandre Maciuk; Inge Mangelsdorf; Harry J McArdle; Androniki Naska; Carmen Pelaez; Kristina Pentieva; Alfonso Siani; Frank Thies; Sophia Tsabouri; Marco Vinceti; Francesco Cubadda; Thomas Frenzel; Marina Heinonen; Rosangela Marchelli; Monika Neuhäuser-Berthold; Morten Poulsen; Miguel Prieto Maradona; Josef Rudolf Schlatter; Henk van Loveren; Ermolaos Ververis; Helle Katrine Knutsen
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2021-01-13

Review 6.  COVID-19 Pandemic Is a Call to Search for Alternative Protein Sources as Food and Feed: A Review of Possibilities.

Authors:  Piotr Rzymski; Magdalena Kulus; Maurycy Jankowski; Claudia Dompe; Rut Bryl; James N Petitte; Bartosz Kempisty; Paul Mozdziak
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Understanding Support for European Integration Across Generations: A Study Guided by the Theory of Planned Behavior.

Authors:  Francesco La Barbera; Icek Ajzen
Journal:  Eur J Psychol       Date:  2020-08-31

8.  Consumer acceptance among Dutch and German students of insects in feed and food.

Authors:  Natalia Naranjo-Guevara; Michelle Fanter; Anna Maria Conconi; Sonja Floto-Stammen
Journal:  Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 2.863

9.  Environmental impact of the production of mealworms as a protein source for humans - a life cycle assessment.

Authors:  Dennis G A B Oonincx; Imke J M de Boer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Edible Insects and Global Food Security.

Authors:  Fabio Verneau; Mario Amato; Francesco La La Barbera
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 2.769

2.  Consumer Perception and Attitude toward Insects for a Sustainable Diet.

Authors:  Mariarosaria Simeone; Debora Scarpato
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 2.769

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.