Literature DB >> 33946185

The Efficacy of Ultrasonic Pest Repellent Devices against the Australian Paralysis Tick, Ixodes holocyclus (Acari: Ixodidae).

Amonrat Panthawong1, Stephen L Doggett2, Theeraphap Chareonviriyaphap1.   

Abstract

Ultrasonic pest repellers are often promoted as a means of protecting people and pets from the bites of hematophagous arthropods, such as ticks. However, to date, there has been no published research on the effectiveness of these devices against the Australian paralysis tick, Ixodes holocyclus Neumann. The purpose of this study was to test the effectiveness of nine ultrasonic devices against female I. holocyclus. Two arenas were constructed, one for the test (with the ultrasonic device) and one for the control (no device). Each arena had a test and an escape chamber, connected by a corridor. Twenty ticks were placed in each test chamber. After the ultrasonic device was operated for 1 h, the number of ticks in both chambers was recorded. Ten replicates were conducted for each device. The average number of ticks that moved from the test to the escape chamber was greater in all the test arenas, with three devices being statistically different from the control. However, the highest percent of ticks that escaped was only 19.5%. This amount is insufficient to offer adequate protection against tick bites and this study adds further weight to previous investigations that ultrasonic devices should not be employed in pest management.

Entities:  

Keywords:  efficacy testing; non-chemical control; tick bite prevention; tick repellent; ultrasonic repellers

Year:  2021        PMID: 33946185     DOI: 10.3390/insects12050400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Insects        ISSN: 2075-4450            Impact factor:   2.769


  21 in total

1.  Tick bite anaphylaxis: incidence and management in an Australian emergency department.

Authors:  Tristan B Rappo; Alice M Cottee; Andrew M Ratchford; Brian J Burns
Journal:  Emerg Med Australas       Date:  2013-07-21       Impact factor: 2.151

2.  The efficacy of ultrasonic pest controllers for fleas and ticks.

Authors:  C R Brown; B D Lewis
Journal:  J S Afr Vet Assoc       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 1.474

3.  Tests of ultrasonic emissions on mosquito attraction to hosts in a flight chamber.

Authors:  W A Foster; K I Lutes
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 0.917

4.  A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. 1925.

Authors:  W S Abbott
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 0.917

5.  Prevention of tick-borne diseases: an overview.

Authors:  Sibylle Rahlenbeck; Volker Fingerle; Stephen Doggett
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Lack of behavioral responses of the cat flea, Ctenocephalides felis (Siphonaptera: Pulicidae), to a broad spectrum of ultrasound.

Authors:  M K Rust; R W Parker
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.278

7.  Does Lyme disease exist in Australia?

Authors:  Peter J Collignon; Gary D Lum; Jennifer Mb Robson
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 7.738

8.  Efficacy of commercially available ultrasonic pest repellent devices to affect behavior of bed bugs (Hemiptera: Cimicidae).

Authors:  K M Yturralde; R W Hofstetter
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Effects of ultrasonic flea collars on Ctenocephalides felis on cats.

Authors:  M W Dryden; G R Long; S M Gaafar
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  1989-12-15       Impact factor: 1.936

10.  Bacterial Profiling Reveals Novel "Ca. Neoehrlichia", Ehrlichia, and Anaplasma Species in Australian Human-Biting Ticks.

Authors:  Alexander W Gofton; Stephen Doggett; Andrew Ratchford; Charlotte L Oskam; Andrea Paparini; Una Ryan; Peter Irwin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.