| Literature DB >> 33945588 |
Mohammad Javad Mollakazemi1, Farhad Asadi2, Mahsa Tajnesaei3, Ali Ghaffari4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fetal heart rate (FHR) extracted from abdominal electrocardiogram (ECG) is a powerful non-invasive method in appropriately assessing the fetus well-being during pregnancy. Despite significant advances in the field of electrocardiography, the analysis of fetal ECG (FECG) signal is considered a challenging issue which is mainly due to low signal to noise ratio (SNR) of FECG.Entities:
Keywords: Abdomen; Electrocardiography; Fetal; Fetal Monitoring; Heart Rate; PCA; Pregnancy; QRS; Signal Quality; Wavelet Analysis
Year: 2021 PMID: 33945588 PMCID: PMC8064132 DOI: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.397
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomed Phys Eng ISSN: 2251-7200
Figure 1Schematic flowchart of the processing stages (left to right).
The results of the proposed method using the PhysioNet noninvasive Fetal electrocardiogram (FECG) database.
| Record Name | Se (%) | PDV (%) | Acc (%) | F1 (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 98.67 | 100 | 98.67 | 99.33 | |
| 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| 97.22 | 99.29 | 96.55 | 98.25 | |
| 94.30 | 99.33 | 93.71 | 96.75 | |
| 94.37 | 99.34 | 93.79 | 96.80 | |
| 99.36 | 99.36 | 98.73 | 99.36 | |
| 99.32 | 100 | 98.31 | 99.66 | |
| 98.72 | 99.35 | 98.09 | 99.03 | |
| 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| 97.42 | 98.01 | 95.56 | 97.73 | |
| 96.85 | 99.35 | 96.25 | 98.09 | |
| 97.94 | 100 | 97.94 | 98.96 | |
| 98.01 | 99.54 | 97.51 | 98.77 |
Se: Sensitivity, PDV: Positive diagnostic value, ACC: Accuracy
Figure 2(Up to down) -The first three channels: The maternal QRS detection results on original abdominal electrocardiogram (AECG) -The second three channels: The extracted Fetal electrocardiogram (FECG) and the detected fetal QRS complexes in optimal FECG channel
Comparison of this study with existing works for fetal heart rate (FHR) measurement.
| Author | Database | Acc (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Ibrahimy et al., 2003 [ | 5 records-1a | 89 |
| Karvounis et al., 2004 [ | 15 records-3 | 98.94 |
| Martens et al., 2007 [ | 20 records-13 | 85 |
| Karvounis et al., 2009 [ | 13 records-3 | 95.45 |
| Hasan et al, 2012 [ | 10 records | 93.75b |
| Behar et al., 2014 [ | 11 records-28 | 90.2c |
| Ghaffari et al., 2015 [ | 69 records-4 | 83.62 |
| 26 records-3 or 4 | 98.21 | |
| This study | 13 records-3 or 4 | 97.51 |
ACC: Accuracy