Literature DB >> 33945304

Continuous Glucose Monitoring Time-in-Range and HbA1c Targets in Pregnant Women with Type 1 Diabetes.

Diana Tundidor1,2, Claire L Meek3,4, Jennifer Yamamoto5,6, Cecilia Martínez-Bru7, Ignasi Gich8,9, Denice S Feig10, Helen R Murphy11,12, Rosa Corcoy1,2,13,2,14.   

Abstract

The CONCEPTT trial compared real-time Continuous Glucose Monitoring (RT-CGM) to capillary glucose monitoring in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. We analyzed CGM and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) measures in first (n = 221), second (n = 197), and third (n = 172) trimesters, aiming to examine target glucose attainment and associations with pregnancy outcomes. CGM targets were Time-in-range (TIR) > 70%, Time-above-range (TAR) <25%, and Time-below-range (TBR) < 4%, and HbA1c targets < 6.5% (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence [NICE]) and HbA1c < 6.0% in second and third trimesters (American Diabetes Association [ADA]). TIR/TAR/TBR targets were achieved by 7.7/14.5/30.3% participants in first, 10.2/14.2/52.8% in second, and 35.5/37.2/52.9% in third trimesters. CGM target attainment was low but increased during pregnancy and with RT-CGM use. In the adjusted analyses, achieving TBR target was associated with a higher risk of pre-eclampsia and neonatal hypoglycemia. ADA HbA1c target attainment was low and unchanged during pregnancy (23.5/27.9/23.8%) but increased with RT-CGM use. In the adjusted analyses, HbA1c target attainment was associated with a lower risk of preterm birth, large-for-gestational age and neonatal hypoglycemia. We conclude that CONCEPTT trial participants had a low rate of CGM and of HbA1c target attainment. Attainment of CGM and NICE HbA1c targets increased throughout gestation and all targets (both NICE/ADA HbA1c and CGM) were more likely to be achieved by RT-CGM users, at 34 weeks' gestation. ADA HbA1c target achievement was independently associated with better perinatal outcomes, while the independent association of TBR target achievement with increased risk warrants further study. ClinicalTrials.gov Registration Identifier NCT01788527.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continuous glucose monitoring; HbA1c target; Pregnancy; Time-in-range; Type 1 diabetes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33945304      PMCID: PMC8573793          DOI: 10.1089/dia.2021.0073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther        ISSN: 1520-9156            Impact factor:   7.337


  21 in total

1.  Association Between Glycemic Variability, HbA1c, and Large-for-Gestational-Age Neonates in Women With Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Rachel T McGrath; Sarah J Glastras; Sean K Seeho; Emma S Scott; Gregory R Fulcher; Samantha L Hocking
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Poor glucose control in women with type 1 diabetes mellitus and 'safe' hemoglobin A1c values in the first trimester of pregnancy.

Authors:  A Kerssen; I M Evers; H W de Valk; G H A Visser
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2003-05

3.  Diurnal glycemic profile in obese and normal weight nondiabetic pregnant women.

Authors:  Yariv Yogev; Avi Ben-Haroush; Rony Chen; Barak Rosenn; Moshe Hod; Oded Langer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery during Pregnancy in Women with Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Zoe A Stewart; Malgorzata E Wilinska; Sara Hartnell; Rosemary C Temple; Gerry Rayman; Katharine P Stanley; David Simmons; Graham R Law; Eleanor M Scott; Roman Hovorka; Helen R Murphy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Fetal overgrowth in women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Linnea Ladfors; Nael Shaat; Nana Wiberg; Anastasia Katasarou; Kerstin Berntorp; Karl Kristensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Continuous glucose monitoring in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes: an observational cohort study of 186 pregnancies.

Authors:  Karl Kristensen; Linda E Ögge; Verena Sengpiel; Karin Kjölhede; Annika Dotevall; Anders Elfvin; Filip K Knop; Nana Wiberg; Anastasia Katsarou; Nael Shaat; Lars Kristensen; Kerstin Berntorp
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2019-03-23       Impact factor: 10.122

7.  Continuous glucose monitoring targets in type 1 diabetes pregnancy: every 5% time in range matters.

Authors:  Helen R Murphy
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 10.122

8.  Continuous glucose monitoring in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes (CONCEPTT): a multicentre international randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Denice S Feig; Lois E Donovan; Rosa Corcoy; Kellie E Murphy; Stephanie A Amiel; Katharine F Hunt; Elizabeth Asztalos; Jon F R Barrett; J Johanna Sanchez; Alberto de Leiva; Moshe Hod; Lois Jovanovic; Erin Keely; Ruth McManus; Eileen K Hutton; Claire L Meek; Zoe A Stewart; Tim Wysocki; Robert O'Brien; Katrina Ruedy; Craig Kollman; George Tomlinson; Helen R Murphy
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  2 in total

1.  Feasibility of maintaining near-normal glucose control in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes during COVID-19 lockdown.

Authors:  M Mateu-Salat; Q Asla; A Chico; M C Martínez; M J Martínez; A López; I Pujol; R Corcoy
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.280

2.  AiDAPT: automated insulin delivery amongst pregnant women with type 1 diabetes: a multicentre randomized controlled trial - study protocol.

Authors:  Tara T M Lee; Corinne Collett; Mei-See Man; Matt Hammond; Lee Shepstone; Sara Hartnell; Eleanor Gurnell; Caroline Byrne; Eleanor M Scott; Robert S Lindsay; Damian Morris; Anna Brackenridge; Anna R Dover; Rebecca M Reynolds; Katharine F Hunt; David R McCance; Katharine Barnard-Kelly; David Rankin; Julia Lawton; Laura E Bocchino; Judy Sibayan; Craig Kollman; Malgorzata E Wilinska; Roman Hovorka; Helen R Murphy
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 3.007

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.